Industry 4.0: driving factors and impacts on firm’s performance: an empirical study on China’s manufacturing industry | Annals of Operations Research Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Industry 4.0: driving factors and impacts on firm’s performance: an empirical study on China’s manufacturing industry

  • S.I.: Information- Transparent Supply Chains
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Industry 4.0 is important for China to achieve industrial upgrading and promoting the quality of manufacturing development. This paper investigates the driving force of the Industry 4.0 in China’s manufacture industry, and evaluates the impact of Industry 4.0 on firm’s performance. First, a textual mining is conducted to identify 460 companies that are implementing Industry 4.0 strategy, and then a Probit model is adopted to examine the driving forces of Industry 4.0. Through the propensity scores matching difference-in-difference method, the impacts of Industry 4.0 on firm’s performance are evaluated. The results reveal that private and large companies show a higher motivation to promote the Industry 4.0 strategy, and government subsidies have no significant impact on firm’s Industry 4.0 decision. The implementation of Industry 4.0 can significant improves firm’s financial performance, innovation activities and stock returns, but has no significant impact on supply chain efficiency. In addition, the adoption of Industry 4.0 has positive impact on firm’s information transparency grade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.csrc.gov.cn/pub/newsite/scb/ssgshyfljg/201811/t20181102_346082.html.

  2. http://www.sse.com.cn/disclosure/credibility/supervision/dynamic/c/c_20180824_4618864.shtml.

  3. http://www.szse.cn/disclosure/supervision/check/index.html.

References

  • Alexopoulos, K., Makris, S., Xanthakis, V., Sipsas, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2016). A concept for context-aware computing in manufacturing: The white goods case. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 29(8), 839–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., Guo, X., Hepfer, A., Menendez, H., & Xiao, X. (2016). Ownership, productivity and firm survival in China. Economia e Politica Industriale, 43(1), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby, L., & Dehe, B. (2018). Defining and assessing industry 4.0 maturity levels–case of the defence sector. Production Planning and Control, 29(12), 1030–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, L., Ferdows, K., Godsell, J., Golini, R., Keegan, R., Kinkel, S., et al. (2015). Manufacturing in the world: Where next? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 35(9), 1253–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. P., Chung, H., Lee, C., & Liao, W. L. (2007). Corporate governance and equity liquidity: Analysis of S&P transparency and disclosure rankings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 644–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, L. C. (2009). Do transparency and disclosure predict firm performance? Evidence from the Taiwan market. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11198–11203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. M., Chan, H. K., & Yue, X. (2017). Recent development in big data analytics for business operations and risk management. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 47(1), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang, J., & Motohashi, K. (2015). Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality. China Economic Review, 35(9), 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, D. (2016). Debt structure and corporate performance in emerging markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 38(9), 299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jabbour, C. J. C., Godinho Filho, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Annals of Operations Research, 270(1–2), 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2018). A critical investigation of Industry 4.0 in manufacturing: Theoretical operationalisation framework. Production Planning and Control, 29(8), 633–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J., Zhao, L., Jia, H., & Shao, S. (2019). Silk road economic belt strategy and industrial total-factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese industries. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 260–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., Gao, J., Shen, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Institutional stock ownership and firms’ cash dividend policies: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 65, 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gölzer, P., & Fritzsche, A. (2017). Data-driven operations management: Organisational implications of the digital transformation in industrial practice. Production Planning and Control, 28(16), 1332–1343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Zhu, J., Chen, Y., & Cook, W. D. (2018). DEA as a tool for auditing: Application to Chinese manufacturing industry with parallel network structures. Annals of Operations Research, 263(1–2), 247–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorkhali, A., & Xu, L. D. (2016). Enterprise application integration in industrial integration: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 1(4), 1650014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45(6), 1129–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddara, M., & Elragal, A. (2015). The readiness of ERP systems for the factory of the future. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 721–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • HassabElnaby, H. R., Hwang, W., & Vonderembse, M. A. (2012). The impact of ERP implementation on organizational capabilities and firm performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(4/5), 618–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K. B., Singhal, V. R., & Stratman, J. K. (2007). The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: A study of ERP, SCM, and CRM system implementations. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunton, J. E., Lippincott, B., & Reck, J. L. (2003). Enterprise resource planning systems: Comparing firm performance of adopters and nonadopters. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(3), 165–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., Werner, F., & Ivanova, M. (2016). A dynamic model and an algorithm for short-term supply chain scheduling in the smart factory industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 54(2), 386–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jazdi, N. (2014). Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. In 2014 IEEE international conference on automation. https://doi.org/10.1109/aqtr.2014.6857843.

  • Jiang, X., Li, S., & Song, X. (2017). The mystery of zombie enterprises—“Stiff but deathless”. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(4), 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, K., Linden, G., & Dedrick, J. (2011). Capturing value in global networks: Apple’s iPad and iPhone’. Oakland: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskai, L. (2018). Why does everyone hate made in China 2025?. Council on Foreign Relations.

  • Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3(1), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Kao, H. A., & Yang, S. (2014). Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia Cirp, 16, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., & Lin, B. (2016). Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China’s manufacturing sector: Evidence from a three-stage DEA model. Applied Energy, 168, 351–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. (2018). China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. Y., Chow, P. S., Choi, T. M., & Chan, H. L. (2016). Supplier integration, green sustainability programs, and financial performance of fashion enterprises under global financial crisis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian, Y., Su, Z., & Gu, Y. (2011). Evaluating the effects of equity incentives using PSM: Evidence from China. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 5(2), 266–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0-a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609–3629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Wu, W. (2018). Why people want to buy electric vehicle: An empirical study in first-tier cities of China. Energy Policy, 112, 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. R., & Fu, X. M. (2017). Does institutional ownership influence firm performance? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 49, 17–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., & Lin, B. (2018). Analysis of the changes in the scale of natural gas subsidy in China and its decomposition factors. Energy Economics, 70, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. X. (2016). Innovation design: Made in China 2025. Design Management Review, 27(1), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Xu, X. (2017). Industry 4.0 and cloud manufacturing: A comparative analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 139(3), 034701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lolli, F., Balugani, E., Ishizaka, A., Gamberini, R., Rimini, B., & Regattieri, A. (2019). Machine learning for multi-criteria inventory classification applied to intermittent demand. Production Planning & Control, 30(1), 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., & Liang, J. (2018). The effects of firm ownership and affiliation on government’s target setting on energy conservation in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 459–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk, S. A., Flynn, B. B., & Awaysheh, A. (2018). The best of times and the worst of times: Empirical operations and supply chain management research. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 164–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. (2008). Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), 699–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. M., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). Sustainable industrial value creation in SMEs: A comparison between industry 4.0 and made in China 2025. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 5(5), 659–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, A. I. (2004). Firm performance effects in relation to the implementation and use of enterprise resource planning systems. Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, A. I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2006). Organizational performance effects of ERP systems usage: The impact of post-implementation changes. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7(1), 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, R., & Grabski, S. (2001). Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2(4), 271–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. W., & Vitale, M. R. (2000). The ERP revolution: surviving vs. thriving. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(2), 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, N., Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (2009). R&D, value chain location and firm performance in the global electronics industry. Industry and Innovation, 16(3), 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, N., Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (2012). Value capture in the global electronics industry: Empirical evidence for the “smiling curve” concept. Industry and Innovation, 19(2), 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, T. M., & Nelson, K. G. (2003). The impact of strategy and integration mechanisms on enterprise system value: Empirical evidence from manufacturing firms. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 315–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., Wang, R., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2015). State ownership and market orientation in China’s public firms: An agency theory perspective. International Business Review, 24(4), 690–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Cen, L., Zheng, Z., Fisher, R., Liang, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2017). How would big data support societal development and environmental sustainability? Insights and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp, 40, 536–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strozzi, F., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Noè, C. (2017). Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’ concept using bibliometric tools. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 6572–6591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Li, G., & Wang, Z. (2018). Optimizing China’s energy consumption structure under energy and carbon constraints. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 47, 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, S., & Pan, Z. (2018). “Made in China 2025” and “industrie 4.0”—In motion together. In U. Sendler (Ed.), The internet of things (pp. 87–113). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjahjono, B., Esplugues, C., Ares, E., & Pelaez, G. (2017). What does industry 4.0 mean to supply chain? Procedia Manufacturing, 13(6), 1175–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trott, P., & Hoecht, A. (2004). Enterprise resource planning (ERP) and its impact on the innovative capability of the firm. International Journal of Innovation Management, 8(04), 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vithessonthi, C., & Tongurai, J. (2015). The effect of firm size on the leverage–performance relationship during the financial crisis of 2007–2009. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 29, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Zhao, J. Y., Wan Z. G., Hong, L., & Jian, M. A. (2016). Lean intelligent production system and value stream practice. In 2016 3rd international conference on economics and management (ICEM 2016). https://doi.org/10.12783/dtem/icem2016/4106.

  • Wieder, B., Booth, P., Matolcsy, Z. P., & Ossimitz, M. L. (2006). The impact of ERP systems on firm and business process performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(1), 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., & Su, Y. F. (2009). The relationship between benefits of ERP systems implementation and its impacts on firm performance of SCM. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22(6), 722–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, M., Meng, B., & Wei, S. J. (2015). Measuring smile curves in global value chains. Institute of Developing Economies Discussion Paper. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2117.3364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, J., Hong, J., Chung Hsu, W., & Wang, C. (2017). The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China. Technovation, 62–63(4), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F., Guo, Y., Le-Nguyen, K., Barnes, S. J., & Zhang, W. (2016). The impact of government subsidies and enterprises’ R&D investment: A panel data study from renewable energy in China. Energy Policy, 89(2), 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., & Zhang, W. (2018). Can sustainable operations achieve economic benefit and energy saving for manufacturing industries in China? Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2955-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. J., & Hao, J. F. (2017). Carbon emission quota allocation among China’s industrial sectors based on the equity and efficiency principles. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1–2), 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K., Liu, T., & Zhou, L. (2015). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. In 2015 12th international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD). https://doi.org/10.1109/fskd.2015.7382284.

  • Zhu, X., & Lin, Y. (2017). Does lean manufacturing improve firm value? Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(4), 422–437.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, China Institute for Studies in Energy Policy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Economics and Energy Policy, Xiamen University, Fujian, 361005, People’s Republic of China

    Boqiang Lin & Wei Wu

  2. School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, 233030, People’s Republic of China

    Malin Song

Authors
  1. Boqiang Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Malin Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malin Song.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, B., Wu, W. & Song, M. Industry 4.0: driving factors and impacts on firm’s performance: an empirical study on China’s manufacturing industry. Ann Oper Res 329, 47–67 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03433-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03433-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation