China’s regional energy and carbon dioxide emissions efficiency evaluation with the presence of recovery energy: an interval slacks-based measure approach | Annals of Operations Research Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

China’s regional energy and carbon dioxide emissions efficiency evaluation with the presence of recovery energy: an interval slacks-based measure approach

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recovery energy has been one of important components of energy consumption structure in China. Recovery energy is a type of secondary energy, which is generated from various sources. Since the estimation of recovery energy from some sources such as coke oven gas and other coal gas contains some uncertainties, recovery energy can be represented as an interval variable. The extant studies in the literature ignore recovery energy in the evaluation of energy efficiency or carbon dioxide (\(\text {CO}_{2}\)) emissions efficiency. As a part of energy supply in China, recovery energy may influence regional primary energy consumption and \(\text {CO}_{2}\) emissions significantly. In this context, this paper proposes an interval slacks-based measure approach to evaluate energy efficiency and \(\text {CO}_{2}\) emissions efficiency in the presence of recovery energy in China. In the described approach, the indicator of \(\text {CO}_{2}\) emissions is incorporated based on the weak disposability assumption, and recovery energy is modeled as a dual factor. The optimal exact data on recovery energy of each region can be obtained. Based on the proposed approach, the measures of energy saving potential and \(\text {CO}_{2}\) emissions reduction potential are derived. Findings resulting from the model application show that there are great disparities in regional efficiencies, and the inefficiency of Chinese regions is largely driven by those inefficient regions in the central and western areas. Notably, the development of recovery energy can help to improve regional energy efficiency and \(\text {CO}_{2}\) emissions efficiency in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Mansour, F. (2011). Energy efficiency trends and policy in Slovenia. Energy, 36(4), 1868–1877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, B. W. (2006). Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: From energy-GDP ratio to composite efficiency index. Energy Policy, 34, 574–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, M., & Saen, R. F. (2011). A new chance-constrained data envelopment analysis for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers in the existence of dual-role factors. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12231–12236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, G., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China’s thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66, 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, G., Luo, Y., Ding, J., & Liang, L. (2015). Environmental performance analysis of Chinese industry from a slacks-based perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 228(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y., He, P., & Xu, H. (2013). Estimation of potential energy saving and carbon dioxide emission reduction in China based on an extended non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy, 63, 962–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Park, H., Jeong, J., & Lee, J. (2014). Evaluating economic and environmental efficiency of global airlines: A SBM-DEA approach. Transportation Research Part D, 27, 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Du, J., Hu, H., & Zhu, J. (2015). Bounded and discrete data and Likert scales in data envelopment analysis: application to regional energy efficiency in China. Annals of Operations Research,. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1827-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y., Zhang, N., & Zhou, P. (2012). Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO\(_{2}\) emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure. Applied Energy, 98, 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., Green, R. H., & Zhu, J. (2006). Dual-role factors in data envelopment analysis. IIE Transactions, 38(2), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2007). Classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 180, 692–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Yu, G. (1999). IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Management Science, 45, 597–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Y., Zhu, Y., Bai, Q., Hu, X., & Yu, S. (2009). Chin’s low carbon development pathways by 2050. Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despotis, D. K., & Smirlis, Y. G. (2002). Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. European Journal of Operational Research, 140(1), 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entani, T., Maeda, Y., & Tanaka, H. (2002). Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(1), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2004). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment. European Journal of Operational Research, 157, 242–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2009). A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43, 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel-Buenaventura, A., & Azzopardi, B. (2015). Energy recovery systems for retrofitting in internal combustion engine vehicles: A review of techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 955–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, X., Zhu, L., Fan, Y., & Xie, B. (2011). Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA. Energy Policy, 39, 2352–2360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Sancho, F., Molinos-Senante, M., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2011). Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: a non-radial DEA approach. Science of The Total Environment, 409, 2693–2699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. L., & Kao, C. H. (2007). Efficient energy-savings targets for APEC economics. Energy Policy, 35, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. L., & Wang, S. C. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 34, 3206–3217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., Wang, S., & Yeh, F. (2006). Total-factor water efficiency of regions in China. Resource Policy, 31, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua, Z. S., Bian, Y. W., & Liang, L. (2007). Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach. Omega, 35, 578–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J., Zhang, P., Tian, Y., Yuan, X., & Yang, Y. (2011). Developing low-carbon economy: Actions, challenges and solutions for energy saving in China. Renewable Energy, 36, 3037–3042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B., Sun, Z., & Liu, M. (2010). China’s energy development strategy under the low carbon economy. Energy, 35, 4257–4264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalili-Damghani, K., Tavana, M., & Haji-Saami, E. (2015). A data envelopment analysis model with interval data and undesirable output for combined cycle power plant performance assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 760–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Zhang, N. (2012). Technical efficiency, shadow price of carbon dioxide emissions, and substitutability for energy in the Chinese manufacturing industries. Energy Economics, 34, 1492–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Mu, H., Zhang, M., & Gui, S. (2012). Analysis of regional difference on impact factors of China’s energy-Related CO\(_{2}\) emissions. Energy, 39, 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Oberheitmann, A. (2009). Challenges of rapid economic growth in China: Reconciling sustainable energy use, environmental stewardship and social development. Energy Policy, 37, 1412–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S., & Gutiérrez, E. (2008). Non-parametric frontier approach to modelling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO\(_{2}\) emissions. Ecological Economics, 66, 687–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S., Gutiérrez, E., & Moreno, P. (2013). Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 1665–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv, W., Hong, X., & Fang, K. (2015). Chinese regional energy efficiency change and its determinants analysis: Malmquist index and Tobit model. Annals of Operations Research, 228(1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J. D., Dey, P. K., Ghosh, S. K., & Davies, P. A. (2013). Evaluation of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India using the hierarchical analytical network process. Energy, 59, 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, J.G.J., Janssens Maenhout, G., & Peters, J.A.H.W. (2012). Trends in global CO\(_{2}\) emissions 2012 report. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency; Ispra: Joint Research Centre. http://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/2012/trends-in-global-co2-emissions-2012-report.

  • Rao, X., Wu, J., Zhang, Z., & Liu, B. (2012). Energy efficiency and energy saving potential in China: Analysis based on slacks-based measure model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63, 578–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. R., Kirac, M., & Hublin, A. (2012). Cost-effectiveness of GHG emission reduction measures and energy recovery from municipal waste in Croatia. Energy, 48, 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan, H. (2008). Re-estimating the capital stock of China: 1952–2006. Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics, 10, 17–31. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., & Wei, Y. (2014). China’s regional industrial energy efficiency and carbon emissions abatement costs. Applied Energy, 130, 617–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Wei, Y., & Zhang, X. (2012). A comparative analysis of China’s regional energy and emission performance: Which is the better way to deal with undesirable outputs? Energy Policy, 46, 574–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Zhang, X., Wei, Y., & Yu, S. (2013). Regional allocation of CO\(_{2}\) emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020. Energy Policy, 54, 214–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., Jiao, H., & Fan, Y. (2007). An empirical analysis of energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel sector. Energy, 32, 2262–2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C., Ni, J., & Du, L. (2012). Regional allocation of carbon dioxide abatement in China. China Economic Review, 23, 552–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Fan, L. W., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. Q. (2012). Industrial energy efficiency with CO\(_{2}\) emissions in China: A nonparametric analysis. Energy Policy, 49, 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Cheng, X., Yuan, J., & Gao, X. (2011). Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energy Policy, 39, 644–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Ang, B. W. (2008). Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy, 36, 2911–2916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2008). A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2006). Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (2003). Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(3), 513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author (Anyu Yu) on behalf of all authors would like to thank the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research is partly supported by the grant of Humanities and Social Sciences of Chinese Ministry of Education (No.10YJC630007). Professor Kangjuan Lyu (Lv) thanks the support by 2013 Shanghai Municipal Philosophy and Social Science fund (no. 2013BCK002). Dr. Bian thanks the support by NSFC grants (Nos.71101085 and 71571115) and NSFC major international (regional) joint research program (No.71320107004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SHU-UTS SILC (Sydney Institute of Language and Commerce) Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 201899, People’s Republic of China

    Yiwen Bian, Kangjuan Lv & Anyu Yu

Authors
  1. Yiwen Bian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kangjuan Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anyu Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anyu Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bian, Y., Lv, K. & Yu, A. China’s regional energy and carbon dioxide emissions efficiency evaluation with the presence of recovery energy: an interval slacks-based measure approach. Ann Oper Res 255, 301–321 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2027-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2027-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation