Abstract
The term affordance refers to the property or quality of an object that indicates the ways in which it could potentially be used. Affordances elicit automatic motor representations that sometimes differ from the current action representation, resulting in behavioural interference effects. This affordance-induces interference could result in automatic and involuntary behavioural inhibition, probably according to the same mechanism that controls the voluntary motor inhibition. Nevertheless, few studies have considered how voluntary response inhibition is modulated by affordance. In this study, we assess the effect of affordance on voluntary action inhibition using a stop-signal task with an affordance object as a Stop Signal. An image of a mug, with the handle orientated in the same or in the opposite direction of the hand recruited to respond at the target, was used as Stop Signal. Our results showed a reduction of the time necessary to withhold the response when the handle of the mug was pointed toward the hand pre-activated to respond. This effect indicates an increased inhibition due to the mismatch between the motor representation elicited by the affordance and the motor representation pre-activated by the target. This suggests a specific interference effect, reflected in an enhanced ability to inhibit an ongoing action.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data and code availability
Row anonymized data, and analysis codes are available upon request.
References
Aron AR (2011) From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biol Psychiatry 69:e55-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024
Aron AR, Verbruggen F (2008) Stop the presses: Dissociating a selective from a global mechanism for stopping: research article. Psychol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02216.x
Battaglia-Mayer A, Caminiti R (2019) Corticocortical systems underlying high-order. Mot Control. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2094-18.2019
Bonnevie T, Zaghloul KA (2019) The subthalamic nucleus: unravelling new roles and mechanisms in the control of action. Neuroscientist 25:48–64
Brass M, Bekkering H, Prinz W (2001) Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol (amst). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00024-X
Cardellicchio P, Dolfini E, Dausilio A (2021) The role of dorsal premotor cortex in joint action stopping. iScience 24:103330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103330
Cardellicchio P, Dolfini E, Fadiga L, D’Ausilio A (2020a) Parallel fast and slow motor inhibition processes in joint action coordination. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.029
Cardellicchio P, Dolfini E, Hilt PM et al (2020) Motor cortical inhibition during concurrent action execution and action observation. Neuroimage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116445
Cardellicchio P, Koch G, Fadiga L, D’Ausilio A (2021) Motor overload: GABAergic index of parallel buffer costs. Brain Stimul Basic, Transl Clin Res Neuromodulation 14:1106–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BRS.2021.07.061
Cardellicchio P, Sinigaglia C, Costantini M (2011) The space of affordances: a TMS study. Neuropsychologia 49:1369–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.021
Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A (1999) Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat Neurosci 2:913–919. https://doi.org/10.1038/13217
Cisek P (2007) Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 362:1585–1599. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTB.2007.2054
Cisek P, Kalaska JF (2005) Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.027
Congdon E, Mumford JA, Cohen JR et al (2012) Measurement and reliability of response inhibition. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00037
Craighero L, Bello A, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (2002) Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00134-8
de Leeuw JR (2015) jsPsych: a javascript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behav Res Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
Dekleva BM, Ramkumar P, Wanda PA et al (2016) Uncertainty leads to persistent effects on reach representations in dorsal premotor cortex. Elife 5:1–24. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14316
Ellis R, Tucker M, Symes E, Vainio L (2007) Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:670–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.670
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. In: Behavior research methods. Psychonomic Society Inc. p 175–191
Fox AM, Michie PT, Wynne CDL, Maybery MT (2000) ERP correlates of response inhibition to elemental and configural stimuli in a negative patterning task. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00257-1
Friedman NP, Miyake A (2004) The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
Gibson JJ (1979) ‘The theory of affordances’. The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Giesen C, Rothermund K (2014) Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: Experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 40:645–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0035278
Goschke T (2000) Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. Attention and performance. MIT Press, Cambridge
Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G (1997) Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/NIMG.1997.0293
Hasbroucq T, Kornblum S (1988) Osman A (1988) A new look at reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Eur Bull Cogn Psychol 8(3):207–221
Hilt PM, Cardellicchio P (2020) Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting? Psychol Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0998-3
Hommel B (1996) S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A Hum Exp Psychol 49:546–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755643
Kreusch F, Quertemont E, Vilenne A, Hansenne M (2014) Alcohol abuse and ERP components in Go/no-go tasks using alcohol-related stimuli: Impact of alcohol avoidance. Int J Psychophysiol 94:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.08.001
Lappin JS, Eriksen CW (1966) Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response. J Exp Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021266
Legrand AC, Price M (2020) Emotionally valenced stimuli impact response inhibition in those with substance use disorder and co-occurring anxiety and depression symptoms. J Affect Disord. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.02.008
Littman R, Kalanthroff E (2022) Neutral affordances: Task conflict in the affordances task. Conscious Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103262
Logan GD (1983) On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: I. Stop-signal studies of decision and memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 9:585–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.585
Logan GD (1994) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users’ guide to the stop signal paradigm. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 189–239
Logan GD (1997) Automaticity and reading: perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Read Writ Q. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130203
Logan GD, Cowan WB (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: General and special theories of an act of control. Psychol Rev 91:295–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035230
McBride J, Boy F, Husain M, Sumner P (2012) Automatic motor activation in the executive control of action. Front Hum Neurosci 6:82
Mysore SP, Kothari NB (2020) Mechanisms of competitive selection: A canonical neural circuit framework. Elife 9:e51473
Norman DA, Shallice T (1986) Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior BT-consciousness and self-regulation. Conscious self-regulation. Springer, Boston, MA
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Pellicano A, Iani C, Maiorana NV et al (2018) (2018) Correspondence effect driven by salient visual asymmetries in integral object stimuli. Psychol Res 843(84):728–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00426-018-1079-3
Pellicano A, Koch I, Binkofski F (2017) Location-coding account versus affordance-activation account in handle-to-hand correspondence effects: evidence of simon-like effects based on the coding of action direction. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 43:1647–1666. https://doi.org/10.1037/XHP0000414
Pessoa L, Padmala S, Kenzer A, Bauer A (2012) Interactions between cognition and emotion during response inhibition. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024109
Proctor RW, Miles JD (2014) Does the concept of affordance add anything to explanations of stimulus-response compatibility effects?, 1st edn. Elsevier Inc., Netherlands
Rey-Mermet A, Gade M, Oberauer K (2018) Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000450
Schulz L, Ischebeck A, Wriessnegger SC et al (2018) Action affordances and visuo-spatial complexity in motor imagery: an fMRI study. Brain Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2018.03.012
Sexton NJ, Cooper RP (2017) Task inhibition, conflict, and the n − 2 repetition cost: a combined computational and empirical approach. Cogn Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.01.003
Sumner P (2008) At the edge of consciousness: automatic motor activation and voluntary control. Neuroscientist 14:474–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858408314435
Thura D, Cisek P (2014) Deliberation and commitment in the premotor and primary motor cortex during dynamic decision making. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.031
Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830
Vainio L (2021) Automatic inhibition of habitual response associated with a non-target object while performing goal-directed actions. Q J Exp Psychol 74:716–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820971921
Vainio L (2011) Negative stimulus-response compatibility observed with a briefly displayed image of a hand. Brain Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.09.007
Vainio L, Ala-Salomäki H, Huovilainen T et al (2014) Mug handle affordance and automatic response inhibition: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Q J Exp Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.868007
Vainio L, Ellis R (2020) Action inhibition and affordances associated with a non-target object: an integrative review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 112:487–502
Vainio L, Ellis R, Tucker M (2007) The role of visual attention in action priming. Q J Exp Psychol 60:241–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600625149
Vainio L, Hammarén L, Hausen M et al (2011) Motor inhibition associated with the affordance of briefly displayed objects. Q J Exp Psychol 64:1094–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.538221
Vainio L, Tiippana K, Peromaa T et al (2022) Negative affordance effect: automatic response inhibition triggered by handle orientation of non-target object. Psychol Res 86:1737–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01600-8
van Gaal S, Ridderinkhof KR, Fahrenfort JJ et al (2008) Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously triggered inhibitory control. J Neurosci 28:8053. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1278-08.2008
van Gaal S, Ridderinkhof KR, van den Wildenberg WPM, Lamme VAF (2009) Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35:1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0013551
Verbruggen F, De Houwer J (2007) Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the stop signal paradigm. Cogn Emot. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600625081
Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2008) Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the Go/no-Go and stop-signal paradigms. J Exp Psychol Gen. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013170
Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2009a) Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35:1381–1388. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0016645
Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2009b) Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35:835–854. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012726
Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2009c) Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:647–661
Verbruggen F, Logan GD, Stevens MA (2008) STOP-IT: windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behav Res Methods 40:479–483. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.479
Verbruggen F, Chambers CD, Logan GD (2013) Fictitious inhibitory differences: how skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychol Sci 24:352–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457390
Verbruggen F, Best M, Bowditch WA et al (2014) The inhibitory control reflex. Neuropsychologia 65:263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2014.08.014
Verbruggen F, Aron AR, Band GPH et al (2019) A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46323
Vince MA (1948) The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refrectory period. J Psychol 38:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1948.tb01150.x
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PC conceived and designed the experiments. PC, AC and ED collected, analysed, and interpreted the data, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
The ethical committee “Comitato Etico Unico della Provincia di Ferrara” approved the experiment.
Informed consent
All the participants included in the study gave their written consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Editor: Anna Belardinelli (Honda Research Institute Europe); Reviewers: Ran Littman (Hebrew University of Jerusalem) and a second researcher who prefers to remain anonymous.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Casarotto, A., Dolfini, E. & Cardellicchio, P. Stop affordance task: a measure of the motor interference effect. Cogn Process 25, 259–266 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01172-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01172-y