Abstract
The aim of the present study was to compare junior and senior healthy participants for their multimodal integration capability. The instrument used for the investigation was the rubber hand illusion (RHI) where synchronous and asynchronous multimodal stimulation were applied. The study focused on assessing the rate of integration for visuo-tactile and visuo-proprioceptive stimuli. Methods: From a large sample of right-handed volunteers, 50 senior employees (containing younger and middle age adults) and 51 senior retired (senior adults) participants were recruited. Results: The between-subject analyses revealed that individuals both the junior and the senior participants responded to induction of RHI with vivid ownership and disownership experiences and a higher mislocalization error in the synchronous condition. However, the between-group analysis showed that participants in the senior group reported less vivid ownership and less vivid total RHI experiences scores compared to members of the junior group, but no mislocalization error differences were found between the groups. Conclusion: The results indicated that when visuo-tactile stimuli synchronously presented, the gain in multisensory integration decreased in seniors group. In contrast, in the case of visuo-proprioceptive synchronous presentation, the efficiency of multisensory integration remained unchanged across the lifespan.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Assaiante C, Barlaam F, Cignetti F, Vaugoyeau M (2014) Body schema building during childhood and adolescence: a neurosensory approach. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clin Neurophysiol 44(1):3–12. doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2013.10.125
Azañón E, Tamè L, Maravita A, Linkenauger SA, Ferrè ER, Tajadura-Ramènez A, Longo MR (2016) Multimodal contribution to body representation. Multisens Res 29:635–661. doi:10.1163/22134808-00002531
Blanke O, Metzinger T (2009) Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn Sci 13(1):7–13. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.003
Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669):756. doi:10.1038/35784
Costantini M, Haggard P (2007) The rubber hand illusion: sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Conscious Cogn 16(2):229–240
Cowie D, Makin TR, Bremner AJ (2013) Children’s responses to the rubber-hand illusion reveal dissociable pathways in body representation. Psychol Sci 24(5):762–769. doi:10.1177/0956797612462902
de Dieuleveult AL, Siemonsma PC, van Erp JBF, Brouwer A-M (2017) Effect of aging in multisensory integration: a systematic review. Front Aging Neurosci. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00080
Devlin AL, Wilson PH (2010) Adult age differences in the ability to mentally transform object and body stimuli. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn J Norm Dysfunct Dev 17(6):709–729
Di Fabio RP, Emasithi A (1997) Aging and the mechanisms underlying head and postural control during voluntary motion. Phys Ther 77:458–475
Diederich A, Colonius H, Schomburg A (2008) Assessing age-related multisensory enhancement with the time-window-of-integration model. Neuropsychologia 46(10):2556–2562. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.026
Dustman RR, Snyder EW (1981) Life - span changes in visually evoked potentials at the cerebral scalp. Neurobiol Aging 2:303–308
Ehrsson HH (2012) The concept of body ownership and its relation to multisensory integration. In: Stein BE (ed) The handbook of multisensory processes. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 775–792
Fabiani M (2012) It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: a psychophysiologist’s view of cognitive aging. Psychophysiology 49:283–304
Feher EP, Mahurin RK, Doody RS, Cooke N, Sims J, Pirozzolo FJ (1992) Establishing the limits of the Mini-Mental State: examination of ‘subtests’. Arch Neurol 49(1):87–92. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00060-7
Folegatti A, Farnè A, Salemme R, de Vignemont F (2012) The rubber hand illusion: two’s a company, but three’s a crowd. Conscious Cogn 21(2):799–812. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.008
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Freiherr J, Lundström JN, Habel U, Reetz K (2013) Multisensory integration mechanisms during aging. Front Hum Neurosci 7:863. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00863
Fuchs X, Riemer M, Diers M, Flor H, Trojan J (2016) Perceptual drift of real and artificial limbs in the rubber hand illusion. Sci Rep 6:24362. doi:10.1038/srep24362
Gallagher S (2006) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press, New York
Grady C (2012) The cognitive neuroscience of aging. Nat Rev Neurosci 13(7):491–505. doi:10.1038/nrn3256
Graham KT, Martin-Iverson MT, Holmes NP, Waters FA (2015) The projected hand illusion: component structure in a community sample and association with demographics, cognition, and psychotic-like experiences. Atten Percept Psychophys 77(1):207–219. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0748-6
Haans A, Ijsselsteijn WA, de Kort YA (2008) The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image 5:389–394
Haans A, Kaiser FG, Bouwhuis DG, Ijsselsteijn WA (2012) Individual differences in the rubber hand illusion: predicting self-reports of people’s personal experiences. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 141:169–177
Hegedüs G, Darnai G, Szolcsányi T, Feldmann Á, Janszky J, Kállai J (2014) The rubber hand illusion increases heat pain threshold. Eur J Pain 18(8):1173–1181. doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.00466.x
Kammers MP, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC, Hogendoorn H, De Vignemont F, Schutter DJ (2009) Is this hand for real? Attenuation of the rubber hand illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule. J Cogn Neurosci 21(7):1311–1320. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21095
Kennett S, Spence C, Driver J (2002) Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture. Percept Psychophys 64(7):1083–1094. doi:10.3758/BF03194758
Konczak J, Sciutti A, Avanzino L, Squeri V, Gori M, Masia L, Abbruzzese G, Sandini G (2012) Parkinson’s disease accelerates age-related decline in haptic perception by altering somatosensory integration. Brain 135:3371–3379. doi:10.1093/brain/aws265
Laurienti PJ, Burdette JH, Maldjian JA, Wallace MT (2006) Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 27(8):1155–1163. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.024
Lenggenhager B, Hilti L, Brugger P (2015) Disturbed body integrity and the “rubber foot illusion”. Neuropsychology 29(2):205–211. doi:10.1037/neu0000143
Lewis E, Lloyd DM (2010) Embodied experience: a first-person investigation of the rubber hand illusion. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 9(3):317–339. doi:10.1007/s11097-010-9154-2
Limanoswski J, Blankenburg F (2016) Integration of visual and proprioceptive limb position information in human posterior parietal, premotor, and extrastriate cortex. J Neurosci 36(9):2582–2589
Liu XZ, Yan D (2007) Ageing, and hearing loss. J Pathol 211:188–197
Lloyd DM (2009) The space between us: a neurophilosophical framework for the investigation of human interpersonal space. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33(3):297–304. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.007
Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MP, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2008) What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107(3):978–998. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.004
Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MPM, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2009) Self-awareness and the body image. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 132:166–172
Lopez C, Bieri CP, Preuss N, Mast FW (2012) Tactile and vestibular mechanisms underlying ownership for body parts: a non-visual variant of the rubber hand illusion. Neurosci Lett 511(2):120–124. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.01.055
Ma K, Hommel B (2013) The virtual-hand illusion: effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance. Front Psychol 4:604
Ma K, Hommel B (2015) Body ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects. Conscious Cogn 36:75–86
Mahoney J, Li PCC, Oh-Park M, Verghase J, Holtzer R (2011) Multisensory integration across the senses in young and old adults. Brain Res 2(1426):43–53
Makin TR, Holmes NP, Ehrsson HH (2008) On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behav Brain Res 191(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.041
Meredith MA, Stein BE (1983) Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science 221(4608):389–391. doi:10.1126/science.6867718
Moseley GL, Gallace A, Spence C (2012) Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical ‘body matrix’. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36(1):34–46. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.013
Mozolic JL, Hugenschmidt CE, Peiffer AM, Laurienti PJ (2008) Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration. Exp Brain Res 184(1):39–52. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1080-3
Mozolic JL, Hugenschmidt CE, Peiffer AM, Laurienti PJ (2012) Multisensory integration and aging. In: Murray MM, Wallace MT (eds) The neural bases of multisensory processes, chapter 20. CRC Press, Boca Raton. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92841/
Murit JW, Kiel DO, Hannan M, Magaziner J, Rubin CT (2013) Dynamic parameters of balance which correlate to elderly persons with a history of falls. PLoS ONE 8:e70566. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070566
Newport R, Schenk T (2012) Prisms, and neglect: what have we learned? Neuropsychologia 50(6):1080–1091
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Owsley C (2011) Aging and vision. Vis Res 51:1610–1622
Peiffert AM, Mozolic JL, Hugenschmidt CE, Laurienti PJ (2007) Age-related multisensory enhancement in a simple audiovisual detection test. NeuroReport 18:1077–1081
Petkova VI, Khoshnevis M, Ehrsson HH (2011) The perspective matters! Multisensory integration in ego-centric reference frames determines full-body ownership. Front Psychol 2(35):1–7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00035
Preston C, Ehrsson HH (2014) Illusory changes in body size modulate body satisfaction in a way that is related to non-clinical eating disorder psychopathology. PLoS ONE 9(1):e85773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085773
Rawson NE (2006) Olfactory loss in aging. Sci Aging Knowl Environ 5:pe6. http://sageke.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2006/5/pe6
Ribeiro F, Oliveira J (2007) Aging effects on joint proprioception: the role of physical activity in proprioception preservation. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 4:71–76
Rohde M, Di Luca M, Ernst MO (2011) The rubber hand illusion: a feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS ONE 6(6):e21659. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021659
Salthouse TA (1996) The processing speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev 103:403–428
Sforza A, Bufalari I, Haggard P, Aglioti SM (2010) My face in yours: visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity. Soc Neurosci 5(2):148–162. doi:10.1080/17470910903205503
Shimada S, Fukuda K, Hiraki K (2009) Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6185. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006185
Skinner HB, Barrack RI, Cook SD (1984) Age related decline in proprioception. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:208–211
Spence C (2011) Cross-modal correspondences: a tutorial review. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:971–995
Stein BE, Stanford TR (2008) Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(4):255–266. doi:10.1038/nrn2331
Stevenson RA, James TW (2009) Audiovisual integration in human superior temporal sulcus: inverse effectiveness and the neural processing of speech and object recognition. Neuroimage 44(3):1210–1223. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.034
Tajadura-Jiménez A, Longo MR, Coleman R, Tsakiris M (2012) The person in the mirror: using the enfacement illusion to investigate the experiential structure of self-identification. Conscious Cogn 21(4):1725–1738. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.10.004
Tsakiris M (2010) My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 48(3):703–712. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034
Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31(1):80. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80
Wold A, Limanowski J, Walter H, Blankenburg F (2014) Proprioceptive drift in the rubber hand illusion is intensified following 1 Hz of the left EBA. Front Hum Neurosci 8(390):1–6
Woodward KL (1993) The relationship between skin compliance, age, gender, and tactile discriminative thresholds in humans. Somatosens Mot Res 10(1):63–67
Woollacott MH (1993) Age-related changes in posture and movement. J Gerontol 48:56–60
Yeh TT, Cinelli ME, Lyons JI, Lee TD (2015) Age related changes in postural control to the demand of a precision task. Hum Mov Sci 44:134–142
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by National Research, Development and Innovation Office NKFIH (Grant No. 120334).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: Marc Ernst (University of Ulm).
Reviewers: Matthew Longo (Birkbeck University of London), Elena Azañon (Birkbeck University of London).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kállai, J., Kincses, P., Lábadi, B. et al. Multisensory integration and age-dependent sensitivity to body representation modification induced by the rubber hand illusion. Cogn Process 18, 349–357 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0827-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0827-4