The purpose of this research was to develop queries that quantify the utilization of comparison imaging in free-text radiology reports. The queries searched for common phrases that indicate whether comparison imaging was utilized, not available, or not mentioned. The queries were iteratively refined and tested on random samples of 100 reports with human review as a reference standard until the precision and recall of the queries did not improve significantly between iterations. Then, query accuracy was assessed on a new random sample of 200 reports. Overall accuracy of the queries was 95.6%. The queries were then applied to a database of 1.8 million reports. Comparisons were made to prior images in 38.69% of the reports (693,955/1,793,754), were unavailable in 18.79% (337,028/1,793,754), and were not mentioned in 42.52% (762,771/1,793,754). The results show that queries of text reports can achieve greater than 95% accuracy in determining the utilization of prior images.













Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
K White WL Smith (1994) ArticleTitleThe role of previous radiographs and reports in the interpretation of current radiographs Invest Radiol 29 263–265 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB38bpt1c%3D Occurrence Handle8175298
UO Aideyan K Berbaum WL Smith (1995) ArticleTitleInfluence of prior radiologic information on the interpretation of radiographic examinations Acad Radiol 2 205–208 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FotVyiuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9419549
JH Sumkin BL Holbert JS Herrmann CA Hakim MA Ganott WR Poller R Shah LA Hardesty D Gur (2003) ArticleTitleOptimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination Am J Roentgenol 180 343–346
MG Thurfjell B Vitak E Azavedo G Svane E Thurfjell (2000) ArticleTitleEffect of sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms Acta Radiol 41 52–56 Occurrence Handle10.1080/028418500127345884 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7islKgtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10665871
CL Christiansen F Wang MB Barton W Kreuter JG Elmore AE Gelfand SW Fletcher (2000) ArticleTitlePredicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms J Natl Cancer Inst 92 1657–1666 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jnci/92.20.1657 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FhvVagsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11036111
InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican College of Radiology (2001) ACR Standard for Communication: Diagnostic Radiology American College of Radiology Reston, VA
InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican College of Radiology (2001) ACR Standard for the Performance of Pediatric and Adult Chest Radiography American College of Radiology Reston, VA
MP Callaway CR Boggis SA Astley I Hutt (1997) ArticleTitleThe influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma Clin Radiol 52 527–529 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA1c3nt1Y%3D Occurrence Handle9240705
LG Quekel R Goei AG Kessels JM Engelshoven Particlevan (2001) ArticleTitleDetection of lung cancer on the chest radiograph: impact of previous films, clinical information, double reading, and dual reading J Clin Epidemiol 54 1146–1150 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00382-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrmvVSitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11675166
TE Wilson VK Nijhawan MA Helvie (1996) ArticleTitleNormal mammograms and the practice of obtaining previous mammograms: usefulness and costs Radiology 198 661–663 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC1MvgslQ%3D Occurrence Handle8628851
LW Bassett B Shayestehfar I Hirbawi (1994) ArticleTitleObtaining previous mammograms for comparison: usefulness and costs Am J Roentgenol 163 1083–1086 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD28jks1Y%3D
DS Channin (2001) ArticleTitleIs it time for ‘PACSter’? J Digit Imaging 14 52–53 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-001-0002-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FhslSitg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11440254
PM Ooijen ParticleVan AH Bongaerts R Witkamp A Wijker W Tukker M Oudkerk (2004) ArticleTitleMulti-detector computed tomography and 3-dimensional imaging in a multi-vendor picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) environment Acad Radiol 11 649–660 Occurrence Handle15172367
BI Reiner EL Siegel FJ Hooper S Pomerantz A Dahlke D Rallis (2001) ArticleTitleRadiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film Am J Roentgenol 176 861–864 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hslaiug%3D%3D
CC Berry (1990) ArticleTitleA tutorial on confidence intervals for proportions in diagnostic radiology Am J Roentgenol 154 477–480 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC28vjtVE%3D
R Hustinx F Benard A Alavi (2002) ArticleTitleWhole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer Semin Nucl Med 32 35–46 Occurrence Handle11839068
PN Cascade L Berlin (1999) ArticleTitleMalpractice issues in radiology: American College of Radiology Standard for Communication Am J Roentgenol 173 1439–1442 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkvFCksQ%3D%3D
L Berlin (1999) ArticleTitleComparing new radiographs with those obtained previously Am J Roentgenol 172 3–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7gtlyjsA%3D%3D
L Berlin (2000) ArticleTitleMust new radiographs be compared with all previous radiographs, or only with the most recently obtained radiographs? Am J Roentgenol 174 611–615 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7mtlGgsA%3D%3D
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lakhani, P., Menschik, E.D., Goldszal, A.F. et al. Development and Validation of Queries Using Structured Query Language (SQL) to Determine the Utilization of Comparison Imaging in Radiology Reports Stored on PACS. J Digit Imaging 19, 52–68 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-005-7667-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-005-7667-y