Euler common spatial pattern modulated with cross-frequency coupling | Knowledge and Information Systems Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Euler common spatial pattern modulated with cross-frequency coupling

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the field of electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs), the method of common spatial pattern (CSP) is formulated as a problem of eigen-decomposition of covariance matrices. Each sample value was mapped into a complex space using Euler representation, and the Euler common spatial pattern (e-CSP) approach was developed. Cross-frequency coupling (CFC) represents the interaction between different frequency bands, which can better control the complex brain network than a single frequency band and provides a new idea for research on EEG signals. In this paper, we apply amplitude–amplitude coupling (AAC) to reformulate the covariance matrices in e-CSP; as a result, the AAC-modulated e-CSP is proposed. More discriminative features are discovered with the proposed approach. The proposed method is validated based on the Cho’s dataset. The experimental results illustrate the discrimination ability of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rithwik P, Benzy VK, Vinod AP (2022) High accuracy decoding of motor imagery directions from EEG-based brain computer interface using filter bank spatially regularized common spatial pattern method. Biomed Signal Process Control 72:103241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Florin P, Fazli S, Badower Y, Blankertz B, Müller KR (2007) Single trial classification of motor imagination using 6 dry EEG electrodes. PLoS ONE 2(7):e637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva FH (1999) Event related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110(11):1842–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siebenhühner F, Wang S, Arnulfo G, Lampinen A, Nobili L, Palva JM, Palva S (2020) Genuine cross-frequency coupling networks in human resting-state electrophysiological recordings. PLoS Biol 18(5):e3000685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fell J, Axmacher N (2011) The role of phase synchronization in memory processes. Nat Rev Neurosci 12(2):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Palva S, Palva JM (2012) Discovering oscillatory interaction networks with M/EEG: challenges and breakthroughs. Trends Cogn Sci 16(4):219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hipp JF, Hawellek DJ, Corbetta M, Siegel M, Engel AK (2012) Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat Neurosci 15(6):884–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siegel M, Donner TH, Engel AK (2012) Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 13(2):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris AZ, Gordon JA (2015) Long-range neural synchrony in behavior. Annu Rev Neurosci 38(1):171–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadaghiani S, Kleinschmidt A (2016) Brain networks and α-oscillations: structural and functional foundations of cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci 20(11):805–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Axmacher N, Henseler MM, Jensen O, Weinreich I, Elger CE, Fell J (2010) Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(7):3228–3233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen MX (2008) Assessing transient cross-frequency coupling in EEG data. J Neurosci Methods 168(2):494–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hyafil A, Giraud A, Fontolan L, Gutkin B (2015) Neural cross-frequency coupling: connecting architectures, mechanisms, and functions. Trends Cogn Sci 38(11):725–740

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davoudi S, Ahmadi A, Daliri MR (2020) Frequency–amplitude coupling: a new approach for decoding of attended features in covert visual attention task. Neural Comput Appl 33(8):3487–3502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimitriadis SI, Salis C, Linden D (2018) A novel, fast and efficient single-sensor automatic sleep-stage classification based on complementary cross-frequency coupling estimates. Clin Neurophysiol 129(4):815–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Georgiadis K, Laskaris N, Nikolopoulos S, Kompatsiaris I (2019) Connectivity steered graph Fourier transform for motor imagery BCI decoding. J Neural Eng 16(5):056021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi W, Yeh C, Hong Y (2019) Cross-frequency transfer entropy characterize coupling of interacting nonlinear oscillators in complex systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 66(2):521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Formaggio E, Storti SF, Galazzo IB, Gandolfi M, Geroin C, Smania N, Spezia L, Waldner A, Fiaschi A, Manganotti P (2013) Modulation of event-related desynchronization in robot-assisted hand performance: brain oscillatory changes in active, passive and imagined movements. J NeuroEng Rehabil 10:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hatamikia S, Nasrabadi AM (2015) Subject transfer BCI based on composite local temporal correlation common spatial pattern. Comput Biol Med 64:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vučković A, Sepulveda F (2012) A two-stage four-class BCI based on imaginary movements of the left and the right wrist. Med Eng Phys 34(7):964–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang K, Zhang S, Chen L, Wang Y, Ming D (2020) Enhance decoding of pre-movement EEG patterns for brain–computer interfaces. J Neural Eng 17(1):016033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun J, Wei M, Luo N, Li Z, Wang H (2022) Euler common spatial patterns for EEG classification. Med Biol Eng Comput 60:753–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong KS, Khan MJ (2017) Hybrid brain–computer interface techniques for improved classification accuracy and increased number of commands: a review. Front Neurorobotics 11:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu R, Li Z, Wang J (2022) An optimized GMM algorithm and its application in single-trial motor imagination recognition. Biomed Signal Process Control 72:103327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liwicki S, Tzimiropoulos G, Zafeiriou S, Pantic M (2013) Euler principal component analysis. Int J Comput Vis 101(3):498–518

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Liao S, Gao Q, Yang Z, Chen F, Nie F, Han J (2018) Discriminant analysis via joint Euler transform and L2,1-norm. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(11):5668–5682

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Y, Gao Q, Han J, Wang S (2018) Euler sparse representation for image classification, The 32th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18) pp. 3691–3697.

  28. Jafakesh S, Jahromy FZ, Daliri MR (2016) Decoding of object categories from brain signals using cross frequency coupling methods, Biomed. Signal Process. Control 27:60–67

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tort LAB, Komorowski R, Eichenbaum H, Kopell N (2010) Measuring phase–amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. J Neurophysiol 104(2):1195–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu H, Li S, Li K, Wang J, Liu J, Mu F (2021) Electroencephalographic cross-frequency coupling and multiplex brain network under manual acupuncture stimulation. Biomed Signal Process Control 69:102832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmadi A, Behroozi M, Shalchyan V, Daliri MR (2017) Phase and amplitude coupling feature extraction and recognition of Ictal EEG using VMD, 2017 IEEE 4th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation pp. 526–532.

  32. Gwon D, Ahn M (2021) Alpha and high gamma phase amplitude coupling during motor imagery and weighted cross-frequency coupling to extract discriminative cross-frequency patterns. Biomed Signal Process Control 240:118403

    Google Scholar 

  33. Penny WD, Duzel E, Miller KJ, Ojemannd JG (2008) Testing for nested oscillation. J Neurosci Methods 174(1):50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang H, Zheng W (2008) Local temporal common spatial patterns for robust single-trial EEG classification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 16(2):131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cho H, Ahn M, Ahn S, Kwon M, Jun S (2017) EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface. GigaScience 6(7):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lotte F, Guan C (2011) Regularizing common spatial patterns to improve BCI designs: unified theory and new algorithms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(2):355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jayaram V, Barachant A (2018) MOABB: trustworthy algorithm benchmarking for BCIs. J Neural Eng 15(6):066011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lu B, Ge S, Wang H (2021) EEG-based classification of lower limb motor imagery with STFT and CNN, International Conference Neural Information Processing pp. 397–404.

  39. Emilio AJJB, Ramón CIRB (2018) Identification of coherent areas using a power spectral density algorithm. Electr. Eng. 100:1009–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Plan (Industry Foresight and Common Key Technology) of Jiangsu Province, China under Grant BE2022157, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62176054. The authors would like to appreciate the suggestions of the anonymous reviewers, which improve the paper substantially.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

    Jing Sun & Haixian Wang

  2. School of Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, 210003, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

    Jiuchuan Jiang

Authors
  1. Jing Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haixian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiuchuan Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JS wrote the manuscript, and collected and analyzed the data. HW and JJ conceived and designed the study. HW reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Haixian Wang or Jiuchuan Jiang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, J., Wang, H. & Jiang, J. Euler common spatial pattern modulated with cross-frequency coupling. Knowl Inf Syst 64, 3401–3418 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-022-01750-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-022-01750-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation