Abstract
Robots have been envisaged as both workers and partners of humans from the earliest period in their history. Therefore, robots should become artificial entities that can socially interact with human beings in social communities. Recent advances in technology have added various functions to robots. The development of actuators and grippers show us infinite possibilities for factory automation, and robots can now walk and perform very smoothly. All of these functions have been developed as solutions for improving robot movement and performance. However, there are many remaining problems in the communication between robots and humans. Communication robots provide one approach to the realization of embodied interfaces. Furthermore, the unsolved problems of human–robot communication can be clarified by adopting the concept of subtractive methods. In this article, we consider the minimal design of robots from the viewpoint of designing communication. By minimal design, we mean eliminating the nonessential portions and keeping only the most fundamental functions. We expect that the simple and clean nature of minimally designed objects will allow humans to interact with these robots without becoming uninterested too quickly. By exploiting the fact that humans have “a natural dislike for the absence of reasoning,” artificial entities built according to minimal design principles can extract the human drive to relate with others. We propose a method of designing a robot that has “character” and is situated in a social context from the viewpoint of minimal design.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
B Reeves C Nass (1998) The media equation CSLI Publications Leland Stanford Junior University
D Norman (2004) The psychology of everyday things Basic Books New York
D Norman (2004) Emotional design Basic Books New York
Norman D (2002) Emotion and design: attractive things work better. ACM Interactions July–August:36–42
T Fong et al. (2003) ArticleTitleA survey of socially interactive robots Robotics Auton Syst Special Issue on Socially Interactive Robots 42 143–166 Occurrence Handle1011.68796
DiSalvo C, et al. (2002) All robots are not equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
McCloud S (1994) Understanding comics. Harper Perennial
MV Cox (1992) Children's drawing Penguin Hamondsworth
N Suzuki Y Takeuchi K Ishii et al. (2000) ArticleTitleTalking eye: autonomous creatures for augmented chatting Robot Auton Syst 31 171–184 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00106-2
Okada M, Sakamoto S, Suzuki N (2000) Muu: artificial creatures as an embodied interface. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH2000). The Emerging Technologies: Point of Departure, p 91
Goan M, Fujii H, Okada M (2005) Child–robot interaction mediated by building blocks: from field observation in a public space. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics (AROB 10th), pp 194–197
Ekman P, Friesen WV (1975) Unmasking the face. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was presented in part at the 10th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Oita, Japan, February 4–6, 2005
About this article
Cite this article
Matsumoto, N., Fujii, H. & Okada, M. Minimal design for human–agent communication. Artif Life Robotics 10, 49–54 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-005-0377-1
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-005-0377-1