Abstract
Gazetteers, i.e., lists of place-names, enable having a global vision of places of interest through the assignment of a point, or a region, to a place name. However, such identification of the location corresponding to a place name is often a difficult task. There is no one-to-one correspondence between the two sets, places and names, because of name variants, different names for the same place and homonymy; the location corresponding to a place name may vary in time, changing its extension or even the position; and, in general, there is the imprecision deriving from the association of a concept belonging to language (the place name) to a precise concept (the spatial location). Also for named time periods, e.g., early Bronze Age, which are of current use in archaeology, the situation is similar: they depend on the location to which they refer as the same period may have different time-spans in different locations. The present paper avails of a recent extension of the CIDOC CRM called CRMgeo, which embeds events in a spatio-temporal 4-dimensional framework. The paper uses concepts from CRMgeo and introduces extensions to model gazetteers and period thesauri. This approach enables dealing with time-varying location appellations as well as with space-varying period appellations on a robust basis. For this purpose a refinement/extension of CRMgeo is proposed and a discretization of space and time is used to approximate real space–time extents occupied by events. Such an approach solves the problem and suggests further investigations in various directions.


Similar content being viewed by others
References
http://www.cidoc-crm.org. Accessed 15 June 2015
Doerr, M., Hiebel, G.: CRMgeo: linking the CIDOC CRM to GeoSPARQL through a spatiotemporal refinement. Technical Report: ICS-FORTH/TR-435. http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/CRMext/CRMgeo/docs/TR435-CRMgeo (2013). Accessed 15 June 2015
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_6.1. Acces-sed 15 June 2015
Niccolucci, F., Hermon, S., Doerr, M.: The formal logical foundations of archaeological ontologies. In: Barcelo, J.A., Bogdanovic, I. (eds.) Mathematics and Archaeology, pp. 86–99. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)
Kenny, J., Richards, JD.: Pathways to a shared European information infrastructure for cultural heritage. Internet Archaeology 18/6 (2005). (Section 4, Fig. 2)
Binding, C.: Implementing archaeological time periods using CIDOC CRM and SKOS. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvnen, E., ten Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pp. 273–287. Springer, Berlin (2010)
http://www.geonames.org. Accessed 15 June 2015
http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/tgn/index.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2015
http://pleiades.stoa.org. Accessed 15 June 2015
Klir, G.J., Bo, Y.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1995)
http://dh.stanford.edu/topotime/docs/TemporalGeometry. Acces-sed 15 June 2015
Niccolucci, F., D’Andrea, A., Crescioli, M.: Archaeological applications of fuzzy databases. In: Stani, Z., Veljanovski, T. (eds.) Computing Archaeology for Understanding the Past. CAA 2000. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 28th Conference, Ljubljana, April 2000 (BAR International Series 931). Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 107–116 (2001)
Holmen, J., Ore, C.-E.: Deducing event chronology in a cultural heritage documentation system. In: Frischer, B., Webb Crawford, J., Koller, D. (eds.) Making History Interactive. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). Proceedings of the 37th International Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America, March 22–26 (BAR International Series S2079), pp. 122–129. Archaeopress, Oxford (2010)
Thomsen, CJ.: Kortfattet udsigt over midesmaeker og oldsager fra Nordens oldtid. In: Rafn, C.C. (ed.) Ledetraad til Nordisk Oldkyndighed (in Danish), pp. 27–87. Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab, Copenhagen (1836)
Todd, I.A.: Kalavasos-Tenta Guide, p. 9. The Bank of Cyprus Cultural Foundation, Nicosia (1998)
Given, M., Knapp, A.B.: The Sydney Cyprus Survey Project, p. 30. UCLA, Los Angeles (2003). (Table 3.1)
Peltenburg, E.J. (ed): Early Society in Cyprus. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1989)
Doerr, M., Plexousakis, D., Kopaka, K., Bekiari, C.: SupportingChronological reasoning in archaeology. In: Niccolucci, F., Hermon, S.(eds.) Beyond the Artifact Digital Interpretation of the Past—Proceedings of CAA2004 Prato 1317 April 2004, pp. 13–17. Archaeolingua, Budapest (2010)
http://www.fish-forum.info/i-time.htm. Accessed 15 June 2015
http://perio.do. Accessed 15 June 2015
Bettini, C., Dyreson, C.E., Evans, W.S., Snodgrass, R.T., Wang, X.S.: A Glossary of time granularity concepts. In: Etzion, O., Jajodia, S., Sripada, S. (eds.) Temporal Databases Research and Practice, pp. 406–413. Springer, Berlin (1998)
Guarino, N., Welty, C.A.: An overview of OntoClean. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 151–171. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Niccolucci, F., Hermon, S.: Time, chronology and classification. In: Barcelo, J.A., Bogdanovic, I. (eds.) Mathematics and Archaeology, pp. 265–279. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)
Belussi, A., Migliorini, S.: A framework for managing temporal dimensions in archaeological data. In: 21st International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME), pp. 81–90. IEEE Explore (2014)
Acknowledgments
The present work has been supported by the ARIADNE project, funded by the European Commission (grant 313193) under the FP7 INFRA-2012-1.1.3 call. The authors opinions do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niccolucci, F., Hermon, S. Representing gazetteers and period thesauri in four-dimensional space–time. Int J Digit Libr 17, 63–69 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0159-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0159-x