From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists’ behaviour in physical libraries | International Journal on Digital Libraries Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists’ behaviour in physical libraries

  • Regular contribution
  • Published:
International Journal on Digital Libraries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been substantial research on various aspects of people’s usage of physical libraries but relatively little on their interaction with individual library artefacts; that is: books, journals, and papers. We have studied people’s behaviour when working in physical libraries, focusing particularly on how they interact with these artefacts, how they evaluate them, and how they interact with librarians. This study provides a better understanding of how people interact with paper information, from which we can draw implications for some requirements of the design of digital libraries, while recognising that the term ‘library’ is a metaphor when applied to electronic document collections. In particular, improved communication with other library users and with librarians could facilitate more rapid access to relevant information and support services, and structuring information presentation so that users can make rapid assessments of its relevance would improve the efficiency of many information searches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams A, Blandford A (2002) Digital libraries in academia: challenges and changes. In: Lim E-P, Foo S, Khoo C, Chen H, Fox E, Urs S, Costantino T (eds) Digital libraries: people, knowledge and technology. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2555. Springer, Berlin, pp 392–403

  2. Anderson JR (1990) Cognitive psychology and its implications. Freeman, San Francisco

  3. Bishop AP (1998) Digital libraries and knowledge disaggregation: the use of journal article components. In: Proceedings of ACM DL’98, pp 29–39

  4. Blandford A, Stelmaszewska H, Bryan-Kinns N (2001) Use of multiple digital libraries: a case study. In: Proceedings of JCDL 2001. ACM Press, Roanoke, Virginia, USA, pp 179–188

  5. Borgman CL (2000) From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: access to information in the networked world. MIT Press

  6. Covi L, Kling R (1997) Organisational dimensions of effective digital library use: closed rational and open natural system model. In: Kiesler S (ed) Culture of the Internet. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 343–360

  7. Crabtree A, Twidale M, O’Brien J, Nichols M (1997) Talking in the library: implications for the design of digital libraries. In: Proceedings of DL’97. ACM Press, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp 221–228

  8. Dillon A, McKnight C, Richardson J (1993) Space – the final chapter or why physical representations are not semantic intentions. In: McKnight C, Dillon A, Richardson J (eds) Hypertext: a psychological perspective. Horwood, New York, pp 169–191

  9. Dillon A (1992) Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics 35(10):1297–1326

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd G, Beale R (1998) Human computer interaction, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  11. Duff WM, Johnson CA (2002) Accidentally found on purpose: information-seeking behavior of historians in archives. Libr Q 72:472–496

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dumas C, Plenacoste P (2002) Libraries: comparisons between the real and the virtual in 3D, 2D zoomable and 2D arborescent. In: Blandford A, Buchanan G (eds) Proceedings of the JCDL workshop on usability, pp 11–14

  13. Duncker E (2002) Cross-cultural usability of the library metaphor. In: Proceedings of the ACM–IEEE joint conference on digital libraries. ACM, New York, pp 223–230

  14. Ellis D (1989) A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. J Doc 45(3):171–212

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ellis D, Cox D, Hall K (1993) A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. J Doc 49(4):356–369

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis D, Haugan M (1997) Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. J Doc 53(4):384–403

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ford N (1999) Information retrieval and creativity: towards support for the original thinker. J Doc 55(5):528–542

    Google Scholar 

  18. Galliers JR (1991) Cooperative interaction as strategic belief revision. In: Deen SM (ed) Cooperating knowledge based systems. Springer, Berlin

  19. Jones S, McInnes S, Staveley M (1999) A graphical user interface for Boolean query specification. Int J Digital Libr 2(2–3):207–223

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kuhlthau C (1988) Longitudinal case studies of the information search process of users in libraries. Libr Inf Sci Res 10(3):257–304

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marchionini G, Shneiderman B (1988) Finding facts versus browsing knowledge in hypertext systems. IEEE Comput 70–79

  22. Marchionini G (1995) Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge University Press

  23. Marshall CC, Golovchinsky G, Price MN (2001) Digital libraries and mobility. Commun ACM 44(5):55–56

    Google Scholar 

  24. Muter P, Maurutto P (1991) Reading and skimming from computer screens: the paperless office revisited. Behav Inf Technol 10(4):257–266

    Google Scholar 

  25. Muter P, Latermouille AS, Treunit WC, Beam P (1982) Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Hum Factors 24:501–508

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nichols DM, Twidale MB, Paice CD (1997) Recommendation and usage in the digital library. URL: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/research/cseg/97_rep.html

  27. O’Hara K, Sellen A (1997) A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In: Proceedings of CHI’97. ACM Press, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp 335–342

  28. Roberts RM (1989) Serendipity: accidental discoveries in science. Wiley, New York

  29. Ross CS (1999) Finding without seeking: the information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Inf Process Manage 3:783–799

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stelmaszewska H, Blandford A (2002) Patterns of interactions: user behaviour in response to search results. In: Blandford A, Buchanan G (eds) Proceedings of the JCDL workshop on usability, pp 29–32

  31. Stone S (1982) Humanities scholars – information needs and uses. J Doc 38(4):292–313

    Google Scholar 

  32. Toms EG (2000) Understanding and facilitating the browsing of electronic text. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:423–452

    Google Scholar 

  33. Theng YL, Mohd-Nasir N, Thimbleby H (2000) Purpose and usability of digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on digital libraries, pp 238–239

  34. Theng YL (2002) Information therapy in digital libraries. In: Lim E-P, Foo S, Khoo C, Chen H, Fox E, Urs S, Costantino T (eds) Digital libraries: people, knowledge and technology. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2555. Springer, Berlin, pp 452–464

  35. Twidale MB, Nichols DM (1998) Using studies of collaborative activity in physical environments to inform the design of digital libraries. Presented at the CSCW’98 workshop on collaborative and co-operative information seeking in digital information environments. (Also as Tech Rep CSEG/11/98, Computing Department, Lancaster University)

  36. Vakkari P, Hakala N (2000) Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance. J Doc 56(5):540–562

    Google Scholar 

  37. Warwick C, Carty C (2001) Only connect, a study of the problems caused by platform specificity and researcher isolation in humanities computing. In: Hubler A, Linde P, Smith JWT (eds) Electronic publishing ’01: 2001 in the digital publishing odyssey. Proceedings of the 5th international ICCC/IFIP conference on electronic publishing, pp 36–47

  38. Watson-Boone R (1994) The information needs and habits of humanities scholars. Ref Q 34(2):203–216

    Google Scholar 

  39. Witten IH, Nevill-Manning CG, McNab R, Cunningham SJ (1998) A public digital library based on full-text retrieval: collections and experience. Commun ACM 41(4):71–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Interaction Design Centre, Middlesex University, UK

    Hanna Stelmaszewska

  2. UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, UK

    Ann Blandford

Authors
  1. Hanna Stelmaszewska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann Blandford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Stelmaszewska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stelmaszewska, H., Blandford, A. From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists’ behaviour in physical libraries. Int J Digit Libr 4, 82–92 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-003-0072-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-003-0072-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation