Fog-assisted healthcare framework for smart hospital environment | Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Fog-assisted healthcare framework for smart hospital environment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The technological revolution brought by the Internet of Things (IoT) has mostly relied on cloud computing. However, to satisfy the demands of time-sensitive services in the medical industry, fog computing, a novel computational platform based on the cloud computing paradigm, has shown to be a useful tool by extending cloud resources to the network’s edge. The current paper examines the role of the fog paradigm in the domain of healthcare decision-making, focusing on its primary advantages in terms of latency, network utilization, and power consumption. A fog-computing-based health assessment framework is developed in the current paper. Moreover, based on effective performance parameters, the performance is evaluated and depicted. The results show that the presented strategy can reduce network congestion of the communication network by analyzing information at the local node. Moreover, increased security on health information can be maintained at local fog node, and enhanced data protection from unauthorized access can be acquired. Fog computing offers greater insights into the health condition of patients with enhanced accuracy, precision, reliability, and stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Aazam M, Huh E-N (2014) Fog computing and smart gateway based communication for cloud of things. In: 2014 International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud, pages 464–470. IEEE

  2. Ahmad M, Amin MB, Hussain S, Kang BH, Cheong T, Lee S (2016) Health fog: a novel framework for health and wellness applications. J Supercomput 72(10):3677–3695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alharbi S, Rodriguez P, Maharaja R, Iyer P, Subaschandrabose N, Ye Z (2017) Secure the internet of things with challenge response authentication in fog computing. In: 2017 IEEE 36th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC), pages 1–2. IEEE

  4. Alrawais A, Alhothaily A, Hu C, Cheng X (2017) Fog computing for the internet of things: security and privacy issues. IEEE Internet Comput 21(2):34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bandyopadhyay S, Bhattacharyya A (2013) Lightweight internet protocols for web enablement of sensors using constrained gateway devices. In: 2013 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), pages 334–340. IEEE

  6. Bhatia M (2020) Fog computing-inspired smart home framework for predictive veterinary healthcare. Microprocess Microsyst 78:103227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatia M (2020) Game theory based framework of smart food quality assessment. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol 31(12):e3926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhatia M, Kaur S, Sood SK (2020) IoT-inspired smart toilet system for home-based urine infection prediction. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare 1(3):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhatia M, Kaur S, Sood SK, Behal V (2020) Internet of things-inspired healthcare system for urine-based diabetes prediction. Artif Intell Med 107:101913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatia M, Kumari S (2021) A novel IoT-fog-cloud-based healthcare system for monitoring and preventing encephalitis. Cognitive Computation 1–18

  11. Bhatia M, Manocha A (2020) Cognitive framework of food quality assessment in IoT-inspired smart restaurants. IEEE Internet of Things Journal

  12. Bhatia M, Sood S, Sood V (2020) A novel quantum-inspired solution for high-performance energy-efficient data acquisition from IoT networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, pages 1–20

  13. Bhatia M, Sood SK (2017) A comprehensive health assessment framework to facilitate IoT-assisted smart workouts: a predictive healthcare perspective. Comput Ind 92:50–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhatia M, Sood SK (2017) Game theoretic decision making in IoT-assisted activity monitoring of defence personnel. Multimedia Tools Appl 76(21):21911–21935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhatia M, Sood SK (2018) An intelligent framework for workouts in gymnasium: M-health perspective. Comput Electr Eng 65:292–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhatia M, Sood SK (2019) Exploring temporal analytics in fog-cloud architecture for smart office healthcare. Mob Netw Appl 24(4):1392–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhatia M, Sood SK (2020) Quantum computing-inspired network optimization for IoT applications. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7(6):5590–5598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhatia M, Sood SK, Kaur S (2019) Quantum-based predictive fog scheduler for IoT applications. Comput Ind 111:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhatia M, Sood SK, Kaur S (2020) Quantumized approach of load scheduling in fog computing environment for IoT applications. Computing 1–19

  20. Cao Y, Chen S, Hou P, Brown D (2015) Fast: a fog computing assisted distributed analytics system to monitor fall for stroke mitigation. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on networking, architecture and storage (NAS), pages 2–11. IEEE

  21. Craciunescu R, Mihovska A, Mihaylov M, Kyriazakos S, Prasad R, Halunga S (2015) Implementation of fog computing for reliable e-health applications. In: 2015 49th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers pages 459–463. IEEE

  22. Dantu K, Ko SY, Ziarek L (2017) Raina: reliability and adaptability in android for fog computing. IEEE Commun Mag 55(4):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Caro N, Colitti W, Steenhaut K, Mangino G, Reali G (2013) Comparison of two lightweight protocols for smartphone-based sensing. In: 2013 IEEE 20th Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux (SCVT), pages 1–6. IEEE

  24. Dsouza C, Ahn G-J, Taguinod M (2014) Policy-driven security management for fog computing: preliminary framework and a case study. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 15th international conference on information reuse and integration (IEEE IRI 2014), pages 16–23. IEEE

  25. Gia TN, Jiang M, Rahmani A-M, Westerlund T, Liljeberg P, Tenhunen H (2015) Fog computing in healthcare internet of things: a case study on ECG feature extraction. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on computer and information technology; ubiquitous computing and communications; dependable, autonomic and secure computing; pervasive intelligence and computing, pages 356–363. IEEE

  26. Gu L, Zeng D, Guo S, Barnawi A, Xiang Y (2015) Cost efficient resource management in fog computing supported medical cyber-physical system. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 5(1):108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang H, Gong T, Ye N, Wang R, Dou Y (2017) Private and secured medical data transmission and analysis for wireless sensing healthcare system. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 13(3):1227–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kashi SS, Sharifi M (2012) Connectivity weakness impacts on coordination in wireless sensor and actor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 15(1):145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kayal P, Perros H (2017) A comparison of IoT application layer protocols through a smart parking implementation. In: 2017 20th Conference on Innovations in Clouds, Internet and Networks (ICIN), pages 331–336. IEEE

  30. Lee W, Nam K, Roh H-G, Kim S-H (2016) A gateway based fog computing architecture for wireless sensors and actuator networks. In: 2016 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pages 210–213. IEEE

  31. Linthicum DS (2017) Connecting fog and cloud computing. IEEE Cloud Computing 4(2):18–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Madsen H, Burtschy B, Albeanu G, Popentiu-Vladicescu FL (2013) Reliability in the utility computing era: towards reliable fog computing. In: 2013 20th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP), pages 43–46. IEEE

  33. Masip-Bruin X, Marín-Tordera E, Tashakor G, Jukan A, Ren G-J (2016) Foggy clouds and cloudy fogs: a real need for coordinated management of fog-to-cloud computing systems. IEEE Wireless Commun 23(5):120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Masip-Bruin X, Marín-Tordera E, Alonso A, Garcia J (2016) Fog-to-cloud computing (f2c): the key technology enabler for dependable e-health services deployment. In: 2016 Mediterranean ad hoc networking workshop (Med-Hoc-Net), pages 1–5. IEEE

  35. Monteiro A, Dubey H, Mahler L, Yang Q, Mankodiya K (2016) Fit: a fog computing device for speech tele-treatments. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on smart computing (SMARTCOMP), pages 1–3. IEEE

  36. Okay FY, Ozdemir S (2018) A secure data aggregation protocol for fog computing based smart grids. In: 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG 2018), pages 1–6. IEEE

  37. Pham X-Q, Huh E-N (2016) Towards task scheduling in a cloud-fog computing system. In: 2016 18th Asia-Pacific network operations and management symposium (APNOMS), pages 1–4. IEEE

  38. Rahmani AM, Gia TN, Negash B, Anzanpour A, Azimi I, Jiang M, Liljeberg P (2018) Exploiting smart e-health gateways at the edge of healthcare internet-of-things: a fog computing approach. Futur Gener Comput Syst 78:641–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sarkar S, Misra S (2016) Theoretical modelling of fog computing: a green computing paradigm to support IoT applications. Iet Networks 5(2):23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Upton E, Halfacree G (2014) Raspberry Pi user guide. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  41. Varghese B, Wang N, Nikolopoulos DS, Buyya R (2020) Feasibility of fog computing. In: Handbook of Integration of Cloud Computing, Cyber Physical Systems and Internet of Things, pages 127–146. Springer

  42. Vilela PH, Rodrigues JJPC, Solic P, Saleem K, Furtado V (2019) Performance evaluation of a fog-assisted IoT solution for e-health applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 97:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University under the project number (2023/01/26407)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq Ahamed Ahanger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahanger, T.A., Aldaej, A. & Alharbi, Y. Fog-assisted healthcare framework for smart hospital environment. Pers Ubiquit Comput 28, 599–613 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-024-01802-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-024-01802-y

Keywords