Interaction of children with and without communication disorders using Montessori activities for the tablet | Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Interaction of children with and without communication disorders using Montessori activities for the tablet

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile technologies used for education may offer advantages for children with Communication Disorders, among which we can find language disorders and speech disorders, which are identified in DSM-V. In this research, we have introduced two educational activities, “Matching Cards” and “Cards & Sounds”, based on the Montessori Method and which deal with the first stages of reading and writing. We have tested these two activities with children with and without Communication Disorders in order to study how they interact. These groups of children use a Tablet to perform the two activities, which vary in visual and auditory stimuli. The activities employ two touch interactions: tap and drag & drop. Based on Montessori, the activity and the interaction do not produce either positive or negative feedback. The analysis performed with the variables of time, interaction and mistake has shown that children from both groups change their efficiency of use. Differences regarding the interaction of children with and without Communication Disorders have also been observed. Additionally, children with Communication Disorders need additional strategies as explicit indicators in the interaction which may be a guide to be able to carry out specific actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disability

  2. https://lescapadou.com/LEscapadou__Fun_and_Educational_applications_for_iPad_and_IPhone/Montessori_Crosswords.html

  3. http://www.arasaac.org/

References

  1. Paul R (2007) Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: assessment & intervention. Elsevier Health Sciences

  2. Marshall C (2017) Montessori education: a review of the evidence base. Npj Sci Learn 2:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Montessori M (2003) The Montessori method. Barnes & Noble Publishing

  4. Awes A (2014) Supporting the dyslexic child in the Montessori environment. NAMTA Journal 39:171–207

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cossentino J (2010) Following all the children: early intervention and Montessori. Montessori Life 22:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vega G (2008) Psicología Educativa UICR: MÉTODO MONTESSORI EN LA EDUCACIÓN ESPECIAL. In: Psicología Educativa UICR. http://uicrpsicoeducativa.blogspot.com/2008/08/mtodo-montessori-en-la-educacin.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2019

  7. Hayes GR, Hirano S, Marcu G, Monibi M, Nguyen DH, Yeganyan M (2010) Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Pers Ubiquit Comput 14:663–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0294-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganz JB, Boles MB, Goodwyn FD, Flores MM (2014) Efficacy of handheld electronic visual supports to enhance vocabulary in children with ASD. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl 29:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357613504991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ploog BO, Scharf A, Nelson D, Brooks PJ (2013) Use of computer-assisted technologies (CAT) to enhance social, communicative, and language development in children with autism Spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 43:301–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1571-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shane HC, Laubscher EH, Schlosser RW, Flynn S, Sorce JF, Abramson J (2012) Applying technology to visually support language and communication in individuals with autism Spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 42:1228–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1304-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ganz JB (2007) Using visual script interventions to address communication skills. Teach Except Child 40:54–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990704000207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Putnam C, Chong L (2008) Software and technologies designed for people with autism: what do users want? In: proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility. ACM, pp 3–10

  13. Cibrian FL, Peña O, Ortega D, Tentori M (2017) BendableSound: an elastic multisensory surface using touch-based interactions to assist children with severe autism during music therapy. Int J Hum Comput Stud 107:22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaaf RC, Benevides T, Mailloux Z, Faller P, Hunt J, van Hooydonk E, Freeman R, Leiby B, Sendecki J, Kelly D (2014) An intervention for sensory difficulties in children with autism: a randomized trial. J Autism Dev Disord 44:1493–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Caro K, Tentori M, Martinez-Garcia AI, Alvelais M (2017) Using the FroggyBobby exergame to support eye-body coordination development of children with severe autism. Int J Hum Comput Stud 105:12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhattacharya A, Gelsomini M, Pérez-Fuster P et al (2015) Designing motion-based activities to engage students with autism in classroom settings. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on interaction design and children. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 69–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Eric Enge (2018) Mobile vs desktop usage in 2018: Mobile widens the gap. In: Stone Temple. https://www.stonetemple.com/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-study/. Accessed 25 Mar 2019

  18. Cabielles-Hernández D, Pérez-Pérez J-R, Paule-Ruiz M, Fernández-Fernández S (2017) Specialized intervention using tablet devices for communication deficits in children with autism Spectrum disorders. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 10:182–193. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2559482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cabielles-Hernández D, Pérez-Pérez JR, Paule-Ruiz Mp, et al (2014) dmTEA: Mobile Learning to Aid in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders. In: Rensing C, de Freitas S, Ley T, Muñoz-Merino PJ (eds) Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. Springer International Publishing, pp 29–41

  20. Levy E (2015) Reading and writing apps for kids. New York family | what to do in New York with kids

  21. Gao Y, Gerling KM, Mandryk RL, Stanley KG (2014) Decreasing sedentary behaviours in pre-adolescents using casual exergames at school. Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play. ACM, In, pp 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  22. Munson J, Pasqual P (2012) Using Technology in Autism Research: the promise and the perils. Computer 45:89–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jakob Nielsen (2012) Usability 101: introduction to usability. In: Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/. Accessed 4 Sep 2019

  24. Stokes TF, Baer DM (1977) An implicit technology of Generalization1. J Appl Behav Anal 10:349–367. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hawkridge D, Vincent T, Hales G et al (2018) New information Technology in the Education of disabled children and adults. Routledge

  26. Wynne R, McAnaney D, MacKeogh T, et al (2016) Assistive Technology/Equipment in Supporting the Education of Children with Special Educational Needs–What Works Best? National Council for Special Education (www.ncse.ie)

  27. Rodríguez CD, Cumming TM (2017) Employing mobile technology to improve language skills of young students with language-based disabilities. Assist Technol 29:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1171810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Frutos M, Bustos I, Zapirain BG, Zorrilla AM (2011) Computer game to learn and enhance speech problems for children with autism. In: 2011 16th international conference on computer games (CGAMES). Pp 209–216

  29. Toki EI, Pange J (2010) E-learning activities for articulation in speech language therapy and learning for preschool children. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2:4274–4278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ellis K, Blashki K (2004) Toddler techies: a study of young Children’s interaction with computers. Inf Technol Child Educ Annu 2004:77–96

    Google Scholar 

  31. Plowman L, Stephen C (2005) Children, play, and computers in pre-school education. Br J Educ Technol 36:145–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00449.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vatavu R-D, Cramariuc G, Schipor DM (2015) Touch interaction for children aged 3 to 6 years: experimental findings and relationship to motor skills. Int J Hum Comput Stud 74:54–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Crescenzi L, Jewitt C, Price S (2014) The role of touch in preschool children’s learning using iPad versus paper interaction. Aust J Lang Lit 37:86–95

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chomsky C (1971) Invented spelling in the open classroom. Word 27:499–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McFarland E (2015) The Importance of Handwriting: How Montessori Didactic Materials support Handwriting. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-River Falls

  36. MacBlain S (2018) Learning theories for early years practice, 1st edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  37. McKenzie GK, Zascavage VS (2012) Montessori instruction: a model for inclusion in early childhood classrooms and beyond. Montessori Life 24:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lillard A, Else-Quest N (2006) Evaluating Montessori education. Science 313:1893–1894. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Di Fuccio R, Siano G, De Marco A (2017) TriPOD: a prototypal system for the recognition of capacitive widget on touchscreen addressed for Montessori-like educational applications. In: Rocha A, Correia AM, Adeli H et al (eds) Recent advances in information systems and technologies, Vol, vol 2, pp 664–676

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Di Fuccio R, Ponticorvo M, Di Ferdinando A, Miglino O (2015) Towards hyper activity books for children. Connecting activity books and Montessori-like educational materials Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9307:401–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_31

  41. Bondy AS, Frost LA (1998) The picture exchange communication system. Semin Speech Lang 19:373–389. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Richards C, Thompson CW, Graham N (2014) Beyond designing for motivation: the importance of context in gamification. Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play. ACM, In, pp 217–226

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lillard AS (2013) Playful learning and Montessori education. NAMTA Journal 38:137–174

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kohn A (1993) Punished by rewards. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tang ST, McCorkle R (2002) Use of family proxies in quality of life research for Cancer patients at the end of life: a literature review. Cancer Investig 20:1086–1104. https://doi.org/10.1081/CNV-120005928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Druin A, Foss E, Hutchinson H et al (2010) Children’s roles using keyword search interfaces at home. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 413–422

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Soler CL, Sevilla JG (1997) Problemas de atención en el niño. Piramide Ediciones Sa

  48. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J

  50. Bogdan R, Biklen SK (2006) Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theories and methods, fifth edition, 5th edn. Pearson, Boston, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  51. Maguire M, Delahunt B (2017) Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education 9:3

    Google Scholar 

  52. Golafshani N (2003) Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual Rep 8:597–607

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bartoli L, Corradi C, Garzotto F, Valoriani M (2013) Exploring motion-based touchless games for autistic children’s learning. In: proceedings of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children. ACM, pp 102–111

  54. German DJ (2002) A phonologically based strategy to improve word-finding abilities in children. Commun Disord Q 23:177–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401020230040301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Allor JH, Fuchs D, Mathes PG (2001) Do students with and without lexical retrieval weaknesses respond differently to instruction? J Learn Disabil 34:264–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wing CS (1990) A preliminary investigation of generalization to untrained words following two treatments of children’s word-finding problems. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 21:151–156

  57. Winoto P, Tang TY (2019) Training joint attention skills and facilitating proactive interactions in children with autism Spectrum disorder: a loosely coupled collaborative tabletop-based application in a Chinese special education classroom. J Educ Comput Res 57:32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117745160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Farinosi M, Lim C, Roll J (2016) Book or screen, pen or keyboard? A cross-cultural sociological analysis of writing and reading habits basing on Germany, Italy and the UK. Telematics Inform 33:410–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially funded by the Department of Science, Innovation and Universities: project RTI2018-099235-B-I00. We have also received funds from the Principality of Asturias, through its Science, Technology and Innovation Plan (grant FC-GRUPIN-IDI/2018/000199) and University of Oviedo to support the Computational Reflection Research Group (GR-2011-0040). We would also like to thank the teachers and caregivers of the educational institutions for their support during this research, as it would not have been possible without their contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of Oviedo. School of Sciences, C/Federico García Lorca S/N, 33007, Oviedo, Spain

    Juan-Ramón Pérez-Pérez, David Cabielles-Hernández, Miguel Sánchez-Santillán & MPuerto Paule-Ruiz

Authors
  1. Juan-Ramón Pérez-Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Cabielles-Hernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miguel Sánchez-Santillán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. MPuerto Paule-Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan-Ramón Pérez-Pérez.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez-Pérez, JR., Cabielles-Hernández, D., Sánchez-Santillán, M. et al. Interaction of children with and without communication disorders using Montessori activities for the tablet. Pers Ubiquit Comput 25, 495–507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01471-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01471-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation