Driver acceptance of car navigation systems: integration of locational accuracy, processing speed, and service and display quality with technology acceptance model | Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Skip to main content

Driver acceptance of car navigation systems: integration of locational accuracy, processing speed, and service and display quality with technology acceptance model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By utilizing and extending the technology acceptance model, this study introduces a new integrated model that analyzes driver acceptance of car navigation systems. The current study conducts in-depth interviews and explores psychological factors that may be significantly related to the usability of car navigation systems. Data collected from 1,181 drivers via an online survey are statistically analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results indicate that the proposed research model accurately predicts driver acceptance of car navigation systems. The model identifies perceived processing speed and locational accuracy of car navigation systems as key psychological constructs, and reveals that satisfaction plays a moderate role. Theoretical implications and practical implications for improving car navigation systems are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magnusson C, Rassmus-Grohn K, Szymczak D (2012) Navigation by pointing to GPS locations. Pers Ubiquit Comput 16:959–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawasaki H, Murao M, Ikeuchi K, Sakauchi M (2001) Enhanced navigation system with real images and real-time information. In: Proceedings of the 8th world congress on intelligent transport systems (ITSWC’01), pp 221–228

  3. Kupper A (2005) Location-based services. Willey, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Nobuyuki K, Tomohiro Y, Osamu S, Andrew L (2000) A driver behavior recognition method based on a driver model framework. SAE Trans 109:469–476

    Google Scholar 

  5. Park E, Kim KJ, del Pobil AP (2013) An examination of psychological factors affecting drivers’ perceptions and attitudes toward car navigation systems. Lect Notes Electr Eng 215:555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Skog I, Handel P (2009) In-car positioning and navigation technologies—a survey. IEEE T Intell Transp 10:4–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujii S, Garling T, Kitamura R (2001) Changes in drivers’ perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure: effects of temporary structural change on cooperation in a real-life social dilemma. Environ Behav 33:796–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Narzt W, Pomberger G, Ferscha A, Kolb D, Müller R, Wieghardt J, Hörtner H, Lindinger C (2004) A new visualization concept for navigation systems. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3196:440–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilliéron PY, Merminod B (2003) Personal navigation system for indoor application. In: Proceedings of the 11th IAIN world congress, pp 1–15

  10. Schiller J, Voisard A (2004) Location-based services. Elsevier, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ariyoshi H, Iwaskaki A, Sugihara T, Ohe H, Sakamoto M (1988) Car navigation system. NEC Tech J 41:149–159

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson D, Cipolla R (2004) An image-based system for urban navigation. In: Proceedings of the 15th British machine vision conference (BMVC’04). Kingston-upon-Thames, UK, pp 819–828

  13. Autos.ca (2011) Product review: five in-car navigation systems. http://www.autos.ca/auto-articles/product-review-five-in-car-navigation-systems. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  14. Korean Police Agency (2008) Efficient plans for providing police traffic information service. http://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/researchCommon/retrieveResearchDetailPopup.do?research_id=1320000-200800027. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  15. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis FD (1993) User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud 38:475–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Paay J, Kjeldskov J (2005) Understanding and modelling built environments for mobile guide interface design. Behav Inform Technol 24:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eriksson N, Strandvik P (2009) Possible determinants affecting the use of mobile tourism services. Commun Comput Inf Sci 48:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park E, Kim KJ, Jin D, del Pobil AP (2012) Towards a successful mobile map service: an empirical examination of technology acceptance model. Commun Comput Inf Sci 293:420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Adell E (2010) Acceptance of driver support systems. http://www.conference2010.humanist-vce.eu/document/Proceedings/6_Adell.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  21. Meschtscherjakov A, Wilfinger D, Scherndl T, Tscheligi M (2009) Acceptance of future persuasive in-car interfaces towards a more economic driving behaviour. In: Kern D, Schmidt A (eds) Proceedings of the 1st international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (AutomotiveUI’09). ACM Press, New York. NY, pp 81–88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheong JH, Park MC (2005) Mobile internet acceptance in Korea. Internet Res 15:125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q 23:695–704

    Google Scholar 

  24. DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inform Syst Res 3:60–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahn T, Ryu S, Han I (2004) The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls. Electron Commer Res Appl 3:405–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ha S, Stoel L (2009) Consumer e-shopping acceptance: antecedents in a technology acceptance model. J Bus Res 62:565–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee GG, Lin HF (2005) Customer perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 33:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shih H (2004) An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on the Web. Inform Manage 41:351–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tan FB, Chou JPC (2008) The relationship between mobile service quality, perceived technology compatibility, users’ perceived playfulness in the context of mobile information and entertainment services. Int J Hum Comput Int 24:649–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wixon BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform Syst Res 16:85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin JSC, Hsieh P (2006) The role of technology readiness in customers’ perception and adoption of self-service technologies. Int J Serv Ind Manag 17:497–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim KJ, Sundar SS, Park E (2011) The effects of screen-size and communication modality on psychology of mobile device users. In: Proceedings of CHI EA’11. ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 1207–1212

  33. Park E, del Pobil AP (2012) Modeling the user acceptance of long-term evolution (LTE) services. Ann Telecommun. doi:10.1007/s12243-012-0324-9

    Google Scholar 

  34. Buss DB (1987) Selection, evocation and manipulation. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:1214–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pagani M (2006) Determinants of adoption of high speed data services in the business market: evidence for a combined technology acceptance model with task technology fit model. Inform Manage 43:847–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yoo B, Donthu N (2001) Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an Internet shopping site (Sitequal). Q J Electron Commer 2:31–46

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lee S (2009) Mobile internet services from consumers’ perspectives. Int J Hum Comput Int 25:390–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Park E, del Pobil AP (2013) Users’ attitudes toward service robots in South Korea. Ind Robot 40:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 46:186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103:411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2006) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 8:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Park E, Kim KJ (2013) User acceptance of long-term evolution (LTE) services: an application of extended technology acceptance model. Program-Electron Lib 47:188–205

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hong W, Thong JYL, Wong WM, Tam KY (2001) Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. J Manage Inform Syst 18:97–124

    Google Scholar 

  45. Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform Syst Res 11:342–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Koivumaki T, Ristola A, Kesti M (2008) The perceptions towards mobile services: an empirical analysis of the role of use facilitators. Pers Ubiquit Comput 12:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mallat N, Rossi M, Tuunainen VK, Oorni A (2008) An empirical investigation of mobile ticketing service adoption in public transportation. Pers Ubiquit Comput 12:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wong YK, Hsu CJ (2008) A confidence-based framework for business to consumer (B2C) mobile commerce adoption. Pers Ubiquit Comput 12:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Aboelmaged MG (2010) Predicting e-procurement adoption in a developing country: an empirical integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Ind Manage Data Syst 110:392–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fusilier M, Durlabhji S, Cucchi A (2008) An investigation of the integrated model of user technology acceptance: internet user samples in four countries. J Educ Comput Res 38:155–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the International Conference on IT Convergence and Security 2012 (ICITCS’12) [5].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunil Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, E., Kim, K.J. Driver acceptance of car navigation systems: integration of locational accuracy, processing speed, and service and display quality with technology acceptance model. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 503–513 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0670-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0670-2

Keywords