On the relationship between the Bowen ratio and the near-surface air temperature | Theoretical and Applied Climatology Skip to main content
Log in

On the relationship between the Bowen ratio and the near-surface air temperature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sensitivity of land surface energy partitioning to near-surface air temperature (T a) is a critical issue to understand the interaction between land surface and climatic system. Thus, studies with in situ observed data compiled from various climates and ecosystems are required. The relations derived from such empirical analyses are useful for developing accurate estimation methods of energy partitioning. In this study, the effect of T a on land surface energy partitioning is evaluated by using flux measurement data compiled from a global network of eddy covariance tower sites (FLUXNET). According to the analysis of 25 FLUXNET sites (60 site-years) data, the Bowen ratio is found to have a linear relation with the bulk surface resistance normalized by aerodynamic and climatological resistance parameters in general, of which the slope and intercept are dependent on T a. Energy partitioning in warmer atmosphere is less sensitive to changes in land surface conditions. In addition, a negative relation is found between Bowen ratio and T a, and this relation is stronger above less vegetated surface and under low vapor pressure deficit and low received radiative energy condition. The empirical results obtained in this study are expected to be useful in gaining better understanding of alternating surface energy partitioning under increasing T a.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Admiral SA, Lafleur PM, Roulet NT (2006) Controls on latent heat flux and energy partitioning at a bog in eastern Canada. Agric For Meteorol 140:308–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aston AR (1985) Heat storage in a young eucalypt forest. Agric For Meteorol 35:281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Rannik Ü, Moncrieff J, Foken T, Kowalski AS, Martin PH, Berbigier P, Bernhofer Ch, Clement R, Elbers J, Granier A, Grünwald T, Morgenstern K, Pilegaard K, Rebmann C, Snijders W, Valentini R, Vesala T (1999) Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of European forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Advances in Ecological Research 30:113–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagayoko F, Yonkeu S, Elbers J, van de Giesen N (2007) Energy partitioning over the West African savanna: multi-year evaporation and surface conductance measurements in Eastern Burkina Faso. J Hydrol 334:545–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi D (1994) A comparative study of mass and energy exchange over a closed C3 (wheat) and an open C4 (corn) canopy: I. The partitioning of available energy into latent and sensible heat exchange. Agric For Meteorol 67:191–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP (1998) On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective. Agric For Meteorol 90:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi D, Kelliher FM, Black TA, Jarvis P (2000) Climate and vegetation controls on boreal zone energy exchange. Glob Chang Biol 6:69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running S, Anthoni P, Bernhofer Ch, Davis K, Evans R, Fuentes J, Goldstein A, Katul G, Law B, Lee X, Malhi Y, Meyers T, Munger W, Oechel W, Paw UKT, Pilegaard K, Schmid HP, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:2415–2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beljaars ACM, Holtslag AAM (1991) Flux parameterization over land surfaces for atmospheric models. J Appl Meteorol 30:327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beringer J, Chapin FS III, Thompson CC, McGuire AD (2005) Surface energy exchanges along a tundra-forest transition and feedbacks to climate. Agric For Meteorol 131:143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan GB (2002) Ecological climatology. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brutsaert W (1982) Evaporation into the atmosphere; theory, history, and application. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers SD, Beringer J, Randerson JT, Chapin FS III (2005) Fire effects on net radiation and energy partitioning: contrasting responses of tundra and boreal forest ecosystems. J Geophys Res 110:D09106. doi:10.1029/2004JD005299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang JH, Root B (1975) On the relationship between mean monthly global radiation and air temperature. Archiv fur Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Ser B 23:13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury BJ, Idso SB, Reginato RJ (1987) Analysis of an empirical model for soil heat flux under a growing wheat crop for estimating evaporation by an infrared temperature based energy balance equation. Agric For Meteorol 39:283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crago RD (1996) Comparison of the evaporative fraction and the Priestley–Taylor α for parameterizing daytime evaporation. Water Resources Research 32:1403–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruin HAR, Keijman JQ (1979) The Priestley–Taylor evaporation model applied to a large, shallow lake in the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Meterology 18:898–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeHeer-Amissah A, Högström U, Smedman-Högström AS (1981) Calculation of sensible and latent heat fluxes, and surface resistance from profile data. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 20:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ, Raupauch MR (1987) Modern theory of transfer in plant canopies in relation to stomatal characteristics. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar G, Cowan L (eds) Stomatal function. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 385–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Foken T, Oncley SP (1995) Results of the workshop “instrumental and methodical problems of land surface flux measurements. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76:1191–1193

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich K, Kleidon A, Lunkeit F (1999) A green planet versus a desert world: estimating the effect of vegetation extremes on the atmosphere. J Clim 12:3156–3163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerle A, Haslwanter A, Tappeiner U, Cernusca A, Wohlfahrt G (2008) Leaf area controls on energy partitioning of a temperature mountain grassland. Biogeosciences 5:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-Sellers A, Dickinson RE, Durbidge TB, Kennedy PJ, McGuffie K, Pitman AJ (1993) Tropical deforestation: modeling local- to regional-scale climate change. J Geophys Res 98:7289–7315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtslag AAM, Van Ulden AP (1983) A simple scheme for daytime estimates of the surface fluxes from routine weather data. J Clim Appl Meteorol 22:517–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac PR, Leuning R, Hacker JM, Cleugh HA, Coppin PA, Denmead OT, Raupach MR (2004) Estimation of regional evapotranspiration by combining aircraft and ground-based measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 110:69–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis PG, James GB, Landsberg JJ (1976) Coniferous forest. In: Monteith JL (ed) Vegetation and Atmosphere, vol 2. Academic, San Diego, pp 171–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher FM, Leuning R, Raupach MR, Schulze ED (1995) Maximum conductances for evaporation from global vegetation types. Agric For Meteorol 73:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu H (2005) Forest categorization according to dry-canopy evaporation rates in a growing season: comparison of the Priestley–Taylor coefficient values from various observation sites. Hydrol Process 19:3873–3896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu H, Kumagai T, Hotta N (2005) Is surface conductance theoretically independent of reference height? Hydrol Process 19:339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu H, Maita E, Otsuki K (2008) A model to estimate annual forest evapotranspiration in Japan from mean annual temperature. J Hydrol 348:330–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo J, Saigusa N, Sato T (1990) A parametrization of evaporation from bare soil surfaces. J Appl Meteorol 29:385–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lhomme J-P (1997) A theoretical basis for the Priestley–Taylor coefficient. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 82:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SG, Eugster W, Asanuma J, Kotani A, Davaa G, Oyunbaatar D, Sugita M (2006) Energy partitioning and its biophysical controls above a grazing steppe in central Mongolia. Agric For Meteorol 137:89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAneney KJ, Itier B (1996) Operational limits to the Priestley–Taylor formula. Irrig Sci 17:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers TP, Baldocchi DD (2005) Current micrometeorological flux methodologies with application in agriculture. In: Hatfield, J.L., Baker, J.M., Viney, M.K. (eds) Micrometeorology in Agricultural Systems, Agronomy Series 47. American Society of Agronomy, Inc.; Crop Science Society of America, Inc.; Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 381–396.

  • Mölder M, Lindroth A (1999) Thermal roughness length of a boreal forest. Agric For Meteorol 98–99:659–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mölders N (2005) Plant- and soil-parameter-caused uncertainty of predicted surface fluxes. Mon Weather Rev 133:3498–3516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and Environment. In: Proceedings of the 19th symposium of the society for experimental biology. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Monteith JL (1995) Accommodation between transpiring vegetation and the convective boundary layer. J Hydrol 166:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL, Unsworth MH (2008) Principles of Environmental Physics, 3rd edn. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez PJ, Castellvi F, Rosell JI, Ibañez M (1999) Assessment of reliability of Bowen ratio method for partitioning fluxes. Agric For Meteorol 97:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana G, Katerji N, Mastrorilli M, El Moujabber M, Brisson N (1997) Validation of a model of actual evapotranspiration for water stressed soybeans. Agric For Meteorol 86:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall DA et al (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Raupach MR (1995) Vegetation–atmosphere interaction and surface conductance at leaf, canopy and regional scale. Agric For Meteorol 73:151–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR (2000) Equilibrium evaporation and the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 96:107–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick ML, Farquhar GD (2002) The cause of decreased pan evaporation over the past 50 years. Science 298:1410–1411

    Google Scholar 

  • Roderick ML, Farquhar GD (2004) Changes in Australian pan evaporation from 1970 to 2002. Int J Climatol 24:1077–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saigusa N, Oikawa T, Liu S (1998) Seasonal variations of the exchange of CO2 and H2O between a grassland and the atmosphere: an experimental study. Agric For Meteorol 89:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JM, Caselles V, Rubio EM (2010) Analysis of the energy balance closure over a FLUXNET boreal forest in Finland. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 14:1487–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner DM, Jacobs JM (2005) Utility of Penman–Monteith, Priestley–Taylor, reference evapotranspiration, and pan evaporation methods to estimate pasture evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 308:81–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom AS (1975) Momentum, mass and heat exchange of plant communities. In: Monteith JL (ed) Vegetation and the atmosphere, vol 1, Principles. Academic, London, pp 57–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorovic M (1999) Single-layer evapotranspiration model with variable canopy resistance. J Irrig Drain Eng 125:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE et al (2007) Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Turnipseed AA, Blanken PD, Anderson DE, Monson RK (2002) Energy budget above a high elevation subalpine forest in complex topography. Agric For Meteorol 110:177–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma SB (1989) Aerodynamic resistances to transfers of heat, mass and momentum. In: T. A. Black, D. L. Spittlehouse, M. D. Novak, and D. T. Price (eds) Estimation of areal evapotranspiration. International Association of Hydrological Sciences. pp 13–20.

  • Verma AB, Baldocchi DD, Anderson DE, Matt DR, Clement RJ (1986) Eddy fluxes of CO2, water vapor, and sensible heat over a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 36:71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KB, Baldocchi DD (2000) Seasonal and interannual variability of energy fluxes over a broadleaved temperate deciduous forest. Agric For Meteorol 100:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KB, Baldocchi DD, Aubient M, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Dolman H, Falge E, Field C, Goldstein A, Katul G, Law BE, Lindroth A, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Monson R, Oechel W, Tenhunen J, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wofsy S (2002) Energy partitioning between latent and sensible heat flux during the warm season at FLUXNET sites. Water Resources Research 38:1294. doi:10.1029/2001WR000989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Sun F, Liu Z, Cong Z, Lei Z (2006) Interpreting the complementary relationship in non-humid environments based on the Budyko and Panman hypotheses. Geophys Res Lett 33:LI8402. doi:10.1029/2006GL027657

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank editor and anonymous reviewers, whose comments were useful for revising this manuscript. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (22119009) and (S)(23226012), and Innovative program of climate change projection for the twenty-first century from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaeil Cho.

Appendix A

Appendix A

ε can represented by the ratio of Δ to γ. γ can be simply calculated with atmospheric pressure, P (Pa).

$$ \gamma = \frac{{{C_{\text{p}}}\;P}}{{{R_{\text{air}}}\;\lambda }} = 664741.8P $$
(9)

where C p is 1,013 (J kg−1°C−1) for moist air at constant pressure, λ is 2.45 × 10−3 (J kg−1) at 20°C, and the ratio of molecular weight of water vapor divided by that of dry air (R air) is 0.622. P can be expressed with the elevation above the sea level z (m).

$$ P = 101,300{\left( {\frac{{293 - 0.0065z}}{{293}}} \right)^{{5.26}}} $$
(10)

Moreover, Δ (Pa°C−1) is the function of T a (°C).

$$ \Delta = \frac{{4,098,000\left[ {0.6108\exp \left( {\frac{{17.27{T_{\text{a}}}}}{{{T_{\text{a}}} + 237.3}}} \right)} \right]}}{{{{\left( {{T_{\text{a}}} + 237.3} \right)}^2}}} $$
(11)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, J., Oki, T., Yeh, P.JF. et al. On the relationship between the Bowen ratio and the near-surface air temperature. Theor Appl Climatol 108, 135–145 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0520-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0520-y

Keywords

Navigation