Transfer function modelling in software reliability | Computing Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Transfer function modelling in software reliability

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the applicability of transfer function model in the field of software reliability. Here a stepwise procedure for fitting a transfer function model has been described and then the prediction of remaining faults in software has been done using the built in model. Some real life data have been used for illustration purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Musa JD, Iannino A, Okumoto K (1987) Software reliability measurement, prediction, application. McGraw-Hill Int, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xie M (1991) Software reliability modelling. World Scientific Press, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Pham H (2006) System software reliability. Springer, UK

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goel AL (1985) Assumptions, limitations and applicability of software reliability modelling. IEEE Trans Software Eng 11: 1411–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jelinski Z, Moranda PB (1972) Software reliability research. In: Freiberger W (ed) Statistical computer performance evaluation. Academic Press, New York, pp 465–484

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shooman ML (1972) Probabilistic models for software reliability prediction. In: Freiberger W (ed) Statistical computer performance evaluation. Academic Press, New York, pp 485–502

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schick GJ, Wolverton RW (1978) An analysis of competing software reliability model. IEEE Trans Software Eng SE-4: 104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Musa JD (1975) A theory of software reliability and its application. IEEE Trans Software Eng SE-1: 312–327

    Google Scholar 

  9. Littlewood B, Verrall JL (1973) A Bayesian reliability growth model for computer software. Appl Stat 22: 332–346

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Xie M (1987) A shock model for software reliability. Microelectron Reliab 27: 717–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goel AL, Okumoto K (1979) A time-dependent error detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measure. IEEE Trans Rel R-28: 206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chatterjee S, Misra RB, Alam SS (1997) Joint effect of test effort and learning factor on software reliability and optimal release policy. Int J Syst Sci 28(4): 391–396

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada S, Ohba M, Osaki S (1984) S-shaped software reliability growth models and their applications. IEEE Trans Rel R-33: 289–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pham L, Pham H (2001) A Bayesian predictive software reliability models with pseudo-failures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 31(3): 233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pham L, Pham H (2000) Software reliability models with time dependent hazard rate based on Bayesian approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 30(1): 25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fakhre- Zakeri I, Slud E (1995) Mixture models for reliability of software with imperfect debugging: identifiably of parameters. IEEE Trans Rel 44: 104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeephongsekul P, Xia G, Kumar S (1994) Software-reliability growth model: primary failures generate secondary-faults under imperfect debugging. IEEE Trans Rel 43: 408–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xia G, Zeephongsekul P, Kumar S (1993) Optimal software release policy with a learning factor for imperfect debugging. Microelectron Rel 33: 81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pham H (1996) A software cost model with imperfect debugging random life cycle and penalty cost. Int J Syst Sci 27: 455–463

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Chatterjee S, Misra RB, Alam SS (1998) A generalized shock model for software reliability. Computer Electr Eng Int J 24: 363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gokhale SS, Lyu MR, Trivedi KS (2006) Incorporating fault debugging activities into software reliability models: a simulation approach. IEEE Trans Rel 55(2): 281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dai YS, Xie M, Poh KL (2005) Modelling and analysis of correlated software failures of multiple types. IEEE Trans Rel 54(1): 100–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xie M, Dai YS, Poh KL, Lai CD (2004) Distributed system availability in the case of imperfect debugging process. Int J Syst Ind Eng Theory Appl Pract 11(4): 396–405

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chatterjee S, Misra RB, Alam SS (2004) N-version programming with imperfect debugging. Comput Electr Eng 30(6): 453–463

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Park DH, Lee CH (2003) Markovian imperfect software debugging model and its performance measures. Stoch Anal Appl 21(4): 849–864

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Misra PN (1983) Software reliability analysis. IBM Syst J 22: 262–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamada S, Osaki S (1985) Cost-reliability optimal release policies for software systems. IEEE Trans Rel 31: 422–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhaskar T, Kumar UD (2006) A cost model for N-version programming with imperfect debugging. J Oper Res Soc 57(8): 986–994

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang X, Teng X, Pham H (2003) Considering fault removal efficiency in software reliability assessment. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 33(1): 114–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang X, Pham H (2000) Comparison of nonhomogeneous poisson process software reliability models and its applications. Int J Syst Sci 31(9): 1115–1123

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Pham H, Normann L, Zhang X (1999) A general imperfect software debugging model with S-shaped fault detection rate. IEEE Trans Rel 48(2): 169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hwang S, Pham H (2009) Quasi-Renewal Time-Delay Fault Removal Consideration in Software Reliability Modelling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 39(1): 200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Singpurwalla ND, Soyer R (1985) Assessing (Software) reliability growth using a random co-efficient autoregressive process and its ramifications. IEEE Trans Software Eng SE-11: 1456–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chatterjee S, Misra RB, Alam SS (1997) Prediction of software reliability using an auto regressive process. Int J Syst Sci 28: 205–211

    Google Scholar 

  35. Walls LA, Bendell A (1987) Time series methods in reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 18: 239–265

    Google Scholar 

  36. Anselmo V, Ubertini L (1979) Transfer function-noise model applied to flow forecasting. Hydrol Sci 24: 353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nason GP, Sapatinas T (2002) Wavelet packet transfer function modeling of nonstationary time series. Stat Comput 12(1): 45–56

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Halas M, Kotta U (2007) Transfer Function of discrete-time Nonlinear Controls. Proc Estonian Acad Phys Math 56(4): 322–335

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Singpurwalla ND (1980) Analyzing availability using transfer function models and cross spectral analysis. Nav Res Logist Quart 27: 1–16

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1976) Time series analysis, forecasting, and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Lyu MR (1996) Handbook of software reliability engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control 19: 716–723

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Mathematics, ISM, Dhanbad, 826004, India

    S. Chatterjee, S. Nigam, J. B. Singh & L. N. Upadhyaya

Authors
  1. S. Chatterjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Nigam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. B. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. N. Upadhyaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Chatterjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chatterjee, S., Nigam, S., Singh, J.B. et al. Transfer function modelling in software reliability. Computing 92, 33–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-010-0128-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-010-0128-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)