Adaptive computational chemotaxis based on field in bacterial foraging optimization | Soft Computing Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive computational chemotaxis based on field in bacterial foraging optimization

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) is predominately used to find solutions for real-world problems. One of the major characteristics of BFO is the chemotactic movement of a virtual bacterium that models a trial solution of the problems. It is pointed out that the chemotaxis employed by classical BFO usually results in sustained oscillation, especially on rough fitness landscapes, when a bacterium cell is close to the optima. In this paper we propose a novel adaptive computational chemotaxis based on the concept of field, in order to accelerate the convergence speed of the group of bacteria near the tolerance. Firstly, a simple scheme is designed for adapting the chemotactic step size of each field. Then, the scheme chooses the fields which perform better to boost further the convergence speed. Empirical simulations over several numerical benchmarks demonstrate that BFO with adaptive chemotactic operators based on field has better convergence behavior, as compared against other meta-heuristic algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Armitage J (1999) Bacterial tactic responses. Adv Microbiol Phys 41:229–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Dasgupta S, Das S, Abraham A (2007) Synergy of PSO and bacterial foraging optimization: a comparative study on numerical benchmarks. In: Proceeding of second international symposis hybrid artificial intell system (HAIS) advances soft computing servive, vol. 44. Innovations in hybrid intelligent systems, ASC. Springer, Germany, pp 255–263

  • Blat Y, Eisenbach M (1995) Tar-dependent and-independent pattern formation by salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 177:1683–1691

    Google Scholar 

  • Budrene E, Berg H (1991) Complex patterns formed by motile cells of Escherichia coli. Nature 349:630–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budrene E, Berg H (1995) Dynamics of formation of symmetrical patterns by chemotactic bacteria. Nature 376:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H-L, Yang B, Wang G, Liu J, Wang S-J, Liu D-Y (2011) A novel bankruptcy prediction model based on an adaptive fuzzy k-nearest neighbor method. Knowl Base Syst 24(8):1348–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Das S, Abraham A, Biswas A (2009) Adaptive computational chemotaxis in bacterial foraging optimization: an analysis. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(4):919–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Das S et al (2010) Automatic circle detection on digital images with an adaptive bacterial foraging algorithm. Soft Comput 14(11):1151–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flury B (1997) A first course in multivariate statistics, vol 28. Springer, New York

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes BD (1996) Random walks and random environments: random walks, vol 1. Oxford University Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proceeding of IEEE international conference of neural network, In, pp 1942–1948

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Cho CH (2005) Bacterial foraging based neural network fuzzy learning. In: Proceeding of 2nd Indian international conference on artificial intelligence (IICAI), pp 2030–2036

  • Kim DH, Abraham A, Cho JH (2007) A hybrid genetic algorithm and bacterial foraging approach for global optimization. Inf Sci 177(18):3918–3937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Passino KM (2002) Biomimicry of social foraging bacteria for distributed optimization: models, principles, and emergent behaviors. J Optim Theory Appl 115(3):603–628

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Majhi R, Panda G et al (2009) Efficient prediction of stock market indices using adaptive bacterial foraging optimization (ABFO) and BFO based techniques. Expert Syst Appl 36(6):10097–10104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S (2005) A hybrid least square-fuzzy bacterial foraging strategy for harmonic estimation. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 9(1):61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Bhende CN (2007) Bacterial foraging technique-based optimized active power filter for load compensation. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 22(1):457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passino KM (2002) Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Syst Mag 22(3):52–67

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnaweera A, Halgamuge KS (2004) Self organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(3):240–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathya PD, Kayalvizhi R (2011) Optimal segmentation of brain MRI based on adaptive bacterial foraging algorithm. Neurocomputing 74(14–15):2299–2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens D, Krebs J (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Liu Y, Li J, Zhu J, Chen H, Liu X (2012) Feature evaluation and selection with cooperative game theory. Pattern Recognit 45(8):2992–3002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen R (2003) Flexible ligand docking using evolutionary algorithms: investigating the effects of variation operators and local search hybrids. BioSystems 72(1–2):57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy M, Mishra S, Lai LL, Zhang QP (2006) Transmission loss reduction based on FACTS and bacteria foraging algorithm. In: Proceeding of parallel problem solving from nature (PPSN), 9–13 Sept 2006, pp 222–231

  • Woodward D, Tyson R, Myerscough M, Murray J, Budrene E, Berg H (1995) Spatio-temporal patterns generated by Salmonella typhimurium. Biophys J 68:2181–2189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Liu Y, Lin G (1999) Evolutionary programming made faster. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3(2):82–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are highly appreciative for the assistance extended by Sambarta Dasgupta in providing the source code of ABFO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui-ling Chen.

Additional information

Communicated by A.-A. Tantar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, X., Chen, Hl. Adaptive computational chemotaxis based on field in bacterial foraging optimization. Soft Comput 18, 797–807 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1089-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1089-4

Keywords

Navigation