Abstract
The building industry and facility management is in a state of upheaval: The complexity of the real world is now represented in its digital counterpart. The established object-based file format “Industrial Foundation Classes (IFC)” developed by the International Alliance for Interoperability facilitates interoperability in the context of Building Information Modeling. Unfortunately, there is no feasible workflow for filtering energy-related information, e.g. a streamlined version of the building geometry. Simplification methods often fail on CAD data that is ignorant of domain specific semantic information (i.e. functional differences between a door and stucco are not reflected in the geometry and are therefore often ignored). With EU law now requiring energy performance certificates to be issued for all buildings, energy performance analysis becomes an increasingly important topic. Accurate, yet efficient calculation depends on simple building models. However, typical IFC models contain a lot of irrelevant data, in particular geometric representations, which are too detailed for energy performance analysis. Therefore, we propose an algorithm that extracts input models suitable for calculations directly from IFC models in a semi-automatic process. The key aspect of the algorithm is geometry simplification subject to semantic and functional groups; more specifically, the 3D representations of walls, slabs, windows, doors, etc. are reduced to a collection of surfaces describing the building’s thermal shell on one hand, and the material layers associated with it on the other hand. This simplification takes into account semantic constraints and expert knowledge. Furthermore, it works on “real-world” data; i.e. it is robust towards incomplete, imperfect and inconsistent data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A-NULL Bauphysik (2005) APS XML schema definition (Online). http://www.archiphysik.at/schema/2005/docs/aps.xsd.html
A-NULL Bauphysik (2014) ArchiPHYSIK (Online). http://www.archiphysik.at
Austrian Standards Institute (2007) ÖNORM B 8110–6: thermal insulation in building construction, Part 6. Principles and verfication methods—heating demand and cooling demand
Bazjanac V (2009) Implementation of semi-automated energy performance simulation: building geometry. In: Proceedings of the International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB W78), pp 595–602
Beetz J, van Berlo L, de Laat R, van den Helm P (2010) BIMserver.org: an open source IFC model server. In: Proceedings of the International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB W78), pp 1–8
Bernstein G, Fussell D (2009) Fast, exact, linear booleans. In: Proceedings of the symposium on geometry processing (SGP ’09), Eurographics Association, pp 1269–1278
BIMsurfer.org (2014) BIMsurfer: open source WebGL viewer for IFC models (2014) (Online). http://bimsurfer.org/
buildingSMART (2014) Model view definition summary (Online). http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/specifications/ifc-view-definition
Campen M, Kobbelt L (2010) Polygonal boundary evaluation of minkowski sums and swept volumes. Comput Graph Forum 29(5):1613–1622
Davis M, Aquino J (2003) JTS topology suite: technical specifications, vivid solutions (Online). http://www.vividsolutions.com/jts/bin/JTSTechnicalSpecs.pdf
Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K (2011) BIM Handbook. Wiley, Hoboken
Franconi E (2011) Introducing a framework for advancing building energy modelling methods and processes. In: Proceedings of building simulation 2011: 12th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, pp K8–K15
Google (2014) Guava: Google Core Libraries for Java 1.6+ (Online). https://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/wiki/NewCollectionTypesExplained#Multimap
Häfele KH, Liebich T (2010) IFC implementation agreement space boundary. buildingSMART
Hitchcock RJ, Wong J (2011) Transforming IFC architectural view BIMs for energy simulation: 2011. In: Proceedings of building simulation 2011: 12th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, pp 1089–1095
Hoffmann C (1989) The problems of accuracy and robustness in geometric computation. Computer 22(3):31–39
International Organization for Standardization (2013) ISO 16739:2013. Industry foundation classes (IFC) for data sharing in the construction and facility management industries
Kettner L, Mehlhorn K, Pion S, Schirra S, Yap C (2008) Classroom examples of robustness problems in geometric computations. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl. 40(1):61–78
Ladenhauf D, Berndt R, Eggeling E, Ullrich T, Battisti K, Gratzl-Michlmair M (2014) From building information models to simplified geometries for energy performance simulation. In: Proceedings of First International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies, pp 669–676
Liebich T et al (2012) Industry foundation classes IFC2x Edition 3 Technical Corrigendum 1
Mitchell J (2011) BIM and building simulation. In: Proceedings of building simulation 2011: 12th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, pp K1–K7
National Institute of Building Sciences (2014) Frequently asked questions about the national BIM standard (Online). http://www.nationalbimstandard.org/faq.php#faq1
Rose CM, Bazjanac V (2013) An algorithm to generate space boundaries for building energy simulation. Eng Comput 1–10
Shewchuck JR (1996) Robust adaptive floating-point geometric predicates. Association for Computing Machinery. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp 141–150
Venugopal M, Eastman C, Sacks R, Teizer J (2011) Improving the robustness of model exchanges using product modeling concepts for IFC schema. Comput Civil Eng, pp 611–618
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) for the research project GINGER (Graphical Energy-Efficiency-Visualization in Architecture), grant number 840190 as well as the support of the European Commission within the DURAARK project founded by the program “ICT-2011-4.3-Digital Preservation”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ladenhauf, D., Berndt, R., Krispel, U. et al. Geometry simplification according to semantic constraints. Comput Sci Res Dev 31, 119–125 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-014-0283-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-014-0283-7