Poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone)-stabilized colloidal graphene-reinforced poly(ethylene-co-methyl acrylate) to mitigate electromagnetic radiation pollution | Polymer Bulletin
Skip to main content

Poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone)-stabilized colloidal graphene-reinforced poly(ethylene-co-methyl acrylate) to mitigate electromagnetic radiation pollution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polymer Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrically conducting flexible polymeric nanocomposite has been fabricated through wet mixing method where conducting inclusion was acoustically exfoliated pristine graphene nanosheets. Colloidal graphene is the key component here which has been prepared by acoustic cavitation in the presence of macromolecular dispersion. The significance of the method is their green preparation strategy without using any chemical reducing agents and long self-life without drastic sedimentation rate. Thermoplastic poly(ethylene-co-methyl acrylate) was chosen as flexible phase where graphene sheets were distributed to make spatial conducting network architecture. The prepared nanocomposites showed 0.259 S/cm DC electrical conductivity and frequency-independent electroconducting character in higher concentration. The electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of the nanocomposites was around 30 dB in ~ 1.0 mm thickness in X-band (8.2–12.4 GHz) frequency range without affecting its mechanical toughness and flexibility. Thus, such pristine graphene-based thermoplastic matrix could be a desirable replacement of metallic shielding materials on the ground of flexible, conducting, lightweight characteristics.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Chen Z, Xu C, Ma C, Ren W, Cheng HM (2013) Lightweight and flexible graphene foam composites for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Mater 25(9):1296–1300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu M, Liu P, Zhang S, Liu J, An J, Li S (2012) Preparation of graphene–Ag composites and their application for electrochemical detection of chloride. Mater Res Bull 47(11):3206–3210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganguly S, Bhawal P, Ravindren R, Das NC (2018) Polymer nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding: a review. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 18(11):7641–7669

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liang J, Wang Y, Huang Y, Ma Y, Liu Z, Cai J, Zhang C, Gao H, Chen Y (2009) Electromagnetic interference shielding of graphene/epoxy composites. Carbon 47(3):922–925

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim H, Kim K, Lee S, Joo J, Yoon H, Cho S, Lyu S, Lee CJ (2004) Charge transport properties of composites of multiwalled carbon nanotube with metal catalyst and polymer: application to electromagnetic interference shielding. Curr Appl Phys 4(6):577–580

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu P, Huang Y, Zhang X (2015) Synthesis, characterization and excellent electromagnetic wave absorption properties of graphene@ CoFe2O4@ polyaniline nanocomposites. Synth Met 201:76–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Huang Y, Ding J (2014) Synthesis and enhanced electromagnetic absorption properties of polypyrrole–BaFe12O19/Ni0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4 on graphene nanosheet. Synth Met 196:125–130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao W-Q, Wang X-X, Yuan J, Wang W-Z, Cao M-S (2015) Temperature dependent microwave absorption of ultrathin graphene composites. J Mater Chem C 3(38):10017–10022

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu M, Wang X, Cao W, Yuan J, Cao M (2015) Carbon nanotube-CdS core–shell nanowires with tunable and high-efficiency microwave absorption at elevated temperature. Nanotechnology 27(6):065702

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganguly S, Das NC (2019) Rheological Properties of Polymer-Carbon Composites. Carbon-Containing Polymer Composites. Springer, Singapore, pp 271–294

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ganguly S, Das P, Banerjee S, Das NC (2019) Advancement in science and technology of carbon dot-polymer hybrid composites: a review. Funct Compos Struct 1(2):022001

    Google Scholar 

  12. Das P, Ganguly S, Banerjee S, Das NC (2019) Graphene based emergent nanolights: a short review on the synthesis, properties and application. Res Chem Intermed 45(7):3823–3853

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li P, Du D, Guo L, Guo Y, Ouyang J (2016) Stretchable and conductive polymer films for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. J Mater Chem C 4(27):6525–6532

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganguly S, Das NC (2016) Chlorosulphonated polyethylene and its composites for electronic applications. Flexible and Stretchable Electronic Composites. Springer, Cham, pp 229–259

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghosh S, Mondal S, Ganguly S, Remanan S, Singha N, Das NC (2018) Carbon nanostructures based mechanically robust conducting cotton fabric for improved electromagnetic interference shielding. Fibers Polym 19(5):1064–1073

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghosh S, Ganguly S, Remanan S, Mondal S, Jana S, Maji PK, Singha N, Das NC (2018) Ultra-light weight, water durable and flexible highly electrical conductive polyurethane foam for superior electromagnetic interference shielding materials. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 29:10177–10189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuping D, Shunhua L, Hongtao G (2005) Investigation of electrical conductivity and electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of polyaniline composite. Sci Technol Adv Mater 6(5):513–518

    Google Scholar 

  18. Geetha S, Kumar KKS, Trivedi DC (2005) Conducting fabric-reinforced polyaniline film using p-chlorophenol as secondary dopant for the control of electromagnetic radiations. J Compos Mater 39(7):647–658

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Niu Y (2006) Preparation of polyaniline/polyacrylate composites and their application for electromagnetic interference shielding. Polym Compos 27(6):627–632

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomassin J-M, Jérôme C, Pardoen T, Bailly C, Huynen I, Detrembleur C (2013) Polymer/carbon based composites as electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials. Mater Sci Eng R: Rep 74(7):211–232

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim HK, Kim MS, Chun SY, Park YH, Jeon BS, Lee JY, Hong YK, Joo J, Kim SH (2003) Characteristics of electrically conducting polymer-coated textiles. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 405(1):161–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim M, Kim H, Byun S, Jeong S, Hong Y, Joo J, Song K, Kim J, Lee C, Lee J (2002) PET fabric/polypyrrole composite with high electrical conductivity for EMI shielding. Synth Met 126(2):233–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Taka T (1991) EMI shielding measurements on poly (3-octyl thiophene) blends. Synth Met 41(3):1177–1180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Courric S, Tran V (2000) The electromagnetic properties of blends of poly (p-phenylene-vinylene) derivatives. Polym Adv Technol 11(6):273–279

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Y, Gupta MC, Dudley KL, Lawrence RW (2005) Novel carbon nanotube-polystyrene foam composites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Nano Lett 5(11):2131–2134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saini P, Choudhary V, Singh B, Mathur R, Dhawan S (2009) Polyaniline–MWCNT nanocomposites for microwave absorption and EMI shielding. Mater Chem Phys 113(2):919–926

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang H-D, Liu C-Y, Zhou D, Jiang X, Zhong G-J, Yan D-X, Li Z-M (2015) Cellulose composite aerogel for highly efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. J Mater Chem A 3(9):4983–4991

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen YC, Prokleška J, Xu WJ, Liu JL, Liu J, Zhang WX, Tong ML (2015) A brilliant cryogenic magnetic coolant: magnetic and magnetocaloric study of ferromagnetically coupled GdF 3. J Mater Chem C 3(47):12206–12211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hsiao S-T, Ma C-CM, Tien H-W, Liao W-H, Wang Y-S, Li S-M, Huang Y-C (2013) Using a non-covalent modification to prepare a high electromagnetic interference shielding performance graphene nanosheet/water-borne polyurethane composite. Carbon 60:57–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhawal P, Das TK, Ganguly S, Mondal S, Das NC (2019) Selective cross-linking of carboxylated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber and study of their technological compatibility with poly (ethylene-co-methyl acrlylate) by means of mechanical, thermal, and chemical analysis. Polym Bull 76(4):1877–1897

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bhawal P, Ganguly S, Das TK, Mondal S, Nayak L, Das NC (2019) A comparative study of physico-mechanical and electrical properties of polymer-carbon nanofiber in wet and melt mixing methods. Mater Sci Eng, B 245:95–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Neto AC, Guinea F, Peres NM, Novoselov KS, Geim AK (2009) The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 81(1):109

    Google Scholar 

  33. CeNeR Rao, AeK Sood, KeS Subrahmanyam, Govindaraj A (2009) Graphene: the new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Ed 48(42):7752–7777

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou M, Zhai Y, Dong S (2009) Electrochemical sensing and biosensing platform based on chemically reduced graphene oxide. Anal Chem 81(14):5603–5613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan J, Fan Z, Wei T, Qian W, Zhang M, Wei F (2010) Fast and reversible surface redox reaction of graphene–MnO2 composites as supercapacitor electrodes. Carbon 48(13):3825–3833

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Verma M, Singh AP, Sambyal P, Singh BP, Dhawan S, Choudhary V (2015) Barium ferrite decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for effective electromagnetic interference shielding. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(3):1610–1618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu W, Li H, Zeng Q, Duan H, Guo Y, Liu X, Sun C, Liu H (2015) Fabrication of ultralight three-dimensional graphene networks with strong electromagnetic wave absorption properties. J Mater Chem A 3(7):3739–3747

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gupta TK, Singh BP, Singh VN, Teotia S, Singh AP, Elizabeth I, Dhakate SR, Dhawan S, Mathur R (2014) MnO2 decorated graphene nanoribbons with superior permittivity and excellent microwave shielding properties. J Mater Chem A 2(12):4256–4263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Arjmand M, Moud AA, Li Y, Sundararaj U (2015) Outstanding electromagnetic interference shielding of silver nanowires: comparison with carbon nanotubes. RSC Adv 5(70):56590–56598

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu Y-H, Ma C-CM, Teng C-C, Huang Y-L, Lee S-H, Wang I, Wei M-H (2012) Electrical, morphological, and electromagnetic interference shielding properties of silver nanowires and nanoparticles conductive composites. Mater Chem Phys 136(2):334–340

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang Y, Gupta M, Dudley K (2007) Studies on electromagnetic interference shielding characteristics of metal nanoparticle-and carbon nanostructure-filled polymer composites in the Ku-band frequency. IET Micro Nano Lett 2(4):85–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Aji M, Bijaksana S, Abdullah M (2012) Electrical and magnetic properties of polymer electrolyte (PVA: LiOH) containing in situ dispersed Fe3O4 nanoparticles. ISRN Mater Sci 2012:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  43. Guo Z, Zhang D, Wei S, Wang Z, Karki AB, Li Y, Bernazzani P, Young DP, Gomes J, Cocke DL (2010) Effects of iron oxide nanoparticles on polyvinyl alcohol: interfacial layer and bulk nanocomposites thin film. J Nanopart Res 12(7):2415–2426

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Das TK, Bhawal P, Ganguly S, Mondal S, Das NC (2018) A facile green synthesis of amino acid boosted Ag decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites and its catalytic activity towards 4-nitrophenol reduction. Surf Interfaces 13:79–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ashori A, Ghiyasi M, Fallah A (2019) Glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composite with surface-modified graphene oxide: enhancement of interlaminar fracture toughness and thermo-mechanical performance. Polym Bull 76(1):259–270

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Moniruzzaman M, Winey KI (2006) Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules 39(16):5194–5205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bourlinos AB, Georgakilas V, Zboril R, Steriotis TA, Stubos AK, Trapalis C (2009) Aqueous-phase exfoliation of graphite in the presence of polyvinylpyrrolidone for the production of water-soluble graphenes. Solid State Commun 149(47):2172–2176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wei W, Lu W, Yang Q-h (2011) High-concentration graphene aqueous suspension and a membrane self-assembled at the liquid–air interface. Carbon 49(8):2879

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun Z, Nicolosi V, Rickard D, Bergin SD, Aherne D, Coleman JN (2008) Quantitative evaluation of surfactant-stabilized single-walled carbon nanotubes: dispersion quality and its correlation with zeta potential. J Phys Chem C 112(29):10692–10699

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wajid AS, Das S, Irin F, Ahmed HT, Shelburne JL, Parviz D, Fullerton RJ, Jankowski AF, Hedden RC, Green MJ (2012) Polymer-stabilized graphene dispersions at high concentrations in organic solvents for composite production. Carbon 50(2):526–534

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bhawal P, Ganguly S, Chaki T, Das N (2016) Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide filled ethylene methyl acrylate hybrid nanocomposites. RSC Adv 6(25):20781–20790

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Behabtu N, Lomeda JR, Green MJ, Higginbotham AL, Sinitskii A, Kosynkin DV, Tsentalovich D, Parra-Vasquez ANG, Schmidt J, Kesselman E, Cohen Y, Talmon Y, Tour JM, Pasquali M (2010) Spontaneous high-concentration dispersions and liquid crystals of graphene. Nat Nano 5:406–411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ferrari A, Meyer J, Scardaci V, Casiraghi C, Lazzeri M, Mauri F, Piscanec S, Jiang D, Novoselov K, Roth S (2006) Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 97(18):187401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ganguly S, Mondal S, Das P, Bhawal P, Das TK, Ghosh S, Remanan S, Das NC (2018) An insight into the physico-mechanical signatures of silylated graphene oxide in poly (ethylene methyl acrylate) copolymeric thermoplastic matrix. Macromol Res 27(3):268–281

    Google Scholar 

  55. Simon RM (1981) EMI shielding through conductive plastics. Polym Plast Technol Eng 17(1):1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ganguly S, Das P, Maity PP, Mondal S, Ghosh S, Dhara S, Das NC (2018) Green reduced graphene oxide toughened semi-IPN monolith hydrogel as dual responsive drug release system: rheological, physicomechanical, and electrical evaluations. J Phys Chem B 122(29):7201–7218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Polley M, Boonstra B (1957) Carbon blacks for highly conductive rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 30(1):170–179

    Google Scholar 

  58. Das TK, Bhawal P, Ganguly S, Mondal S, Remanan S, Ghosh S, Das NC (2018) Synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanorods and its use as a nanoreinforcement block for ethylene methacrylate copolymer matrix. Polym Bull 76(7):3621–3642

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ryvkina N, Tchmutin I, Vilčáková J, Pelíšková M, Sáha P (2005) The deformation behavior of conductivity in composites where charge carrier transport is by tunneling: theoretical modeling and experimental results. Synth Met 148(2):141–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ghosh S, Ganguly S, Remanan S, Das NC (2019) Fabrication and investigation of 3D tuned PEG/PEDOT: PSS treated conductive and durable cotton fabric for superior electrical conductivity and flexible electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos Sci Technol 181:107682

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ghosh S, Ganguly S, Das P, Das TK, Bose M, Singha NK, Das AK, Das NC (2019) Fabrication of reduced graphene oxide/silver nanoparticles decorated conductive cotton fabric for high performing electromagnetic interference shielding and antibacterial application. Fibers Polym 20(6):1161–1171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Yang Y, Gupta MC, Dudley KL (2007) Towards cost-efficient EMI shielding materials using carbon nanostructure-based nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 18(34):345701

    Google Scholar 

  63. Afanasov I, Morozov V, Kepman A, Ionov S, Seleznev A, Van Tendeloo G, Avdeev V (2009) Preparation, electrical and thermal properties of new exfoliated graphite-based composites. Carbon 47(1):263–270

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Goyal R (2013) Cost-efficient high performance polyetheretherketone/expanded graphite nanocomposites with high conductivity for EMI shielding application. Mater Chem Phys 142(1):195–198

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Al-Saleh MH (2016) Electrical and electromagnetic interference shielding characteristics of GNP/UHMWPE composites. J Phys D Appl Phys 49(19):195302

    Google Scholar 

  66. Nimbalkar P, Korde A, Goyal R (2018) Electromagnetic interference shielding of polycarbonate/GNP nanocomposites in X-band. Mater Chem Phys 206:251–258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Bansala T, Joshi M, Mukhopadhyay S, Doong R-a, Chaudhary M (2017) Electrically conducting graphene-based polyurethane nanocomposites for microwave shielding applications in the Ku band. J Mater Sci 52(3):1546–1560

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Science and Engineering Research Board (Grant No. ECR/2016/000048).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narayan Chandra Das.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganguly, S., Ghosh, S., Das, P. et al. Poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone)-stabilized colloidal graphene-reinforced poly(ethylene-co-methyl acrylate) to mitigate electromagnetic radiation pollution. Polym. Bull. 77, 2923–2943 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-02892-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-02892-y