Algorithms for lattice games | International Journal of Game Theory Skip to main content
Log in

Algorithms for lattice games

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides effective methods for the polyhedral formulation of impartial finite combinatorial games as lattice games (Guo et al. Oberwolfach Rep 22: 23–26, 2009; Guo and Miller, Adv Appl Math 46:363–378, 2010). Given a rational strategy for a lattice game, a polynomial time algorithm is presented to decide (i) whether a given position is a winning position, and to find a move to a winning position, if not; and (ii) to decide whether two given positions are congruent, in the sense of misère quotient theory (Plambeck, Integers, 5:36, 2005; Plambeck and Siegel, J Combin Theory Ser A, 115: 593–622, 2008). The methods are based on the theory of short rational generating functions (Barvinok and Woods, J Am Math Soc, 16: 957–979, 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barvinok A (2006) The complexity of generating functions for integer points in polyhedra and beyond. International Congress of Mathematicians, vol III. European Mathematical Society, Zurich, pp 763–787

  • Barvinok A, Woods K (2003) Short rational generating functions for lattice point problems. J Am Math Soc 16(4): 957–979 (electronic)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouton CL (1901/02) Nim, a game with a complete mathematical theory. Ann Math (2) 3(1–4):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson T (1934) Fairy chess supplement. The problemist: British Chess Problem Society 2(9), 94, problem no. 1603

  • Fink A (2011) Lattice games without rational strategies. J Comb Theory Ser A 119(2): 450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo A, Miller E (2010) Lattice point methods for combinatorial games. Adv Appl Math 46: 363–378. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2010.10.004 (arXiv:math.CO/0908.3473; Erratum: preprint, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo A, Miller E, Weimerskirch M (2009) Potential applications of commutative algebra to combinatorial game theory. In: Kommutative Algebra, abstracts from the April 19–25, 2009 workshop, organized by W. Bruns, H. Flenner, and C. Huneke, Oberwolfach Rep 22:23–26

  • Guy RK, Smith CAB (1956) The G-values of various games. Proc Camb Philos Soc 52: 514–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller E (2010) Affine stratifications from finite misère quotients (preprint, 2010. arXiv:math. CO/1009. 2199v1)

  • Miller E, Sturmfels B (2005) Combinatorial commutative algebra. Graduate texts in mathematics, vol 227. Springer–Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Plambeck TE (2005) Taming the wild in impartial combinatorial games. Integers 5(1), G5, p 36 (electronic)

  • Plambeck TE, Siegel AN (2008) Misère quotients for impartial games. J Combin Theory Ser A 115(4): 593–622 (arXiv:math.CO/0609825v5)

  • Weimerskirch M (2009) An algorithm for computing indistinguishability quotients in misère impartial combinatorial games (preprint)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, A., Miller, E. Algorithms for lattice games. Int J Game Theory 42, 777–788 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-012-0319-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-012-0319-9

Keywords