Abstract
This paper focuses on the estimation of the coefficient functions, which is of primary interest, in generalized varying-coefficient models with non-exponential family error. The local weighted quasi-likelihood method which results from local polynomial regression techniques is presented. The nonparametric estimator based on iterative weighted quasi-likelihood method is obtained to estimate coefficient functions. The asymptotic efficiency of the proposed estimator is given. Furthermore, some simulations are carried out to evaluate the finite sample performance of the proposed method, which show that it possesses some advantages to the previous methods. Finally, a real data example is used to illustrate the proposed methodology.






Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cai J, Fan J, Jiang J, Zhou H (2008) Partially linear hazard regression with varying coefficients for multivariate survival data. J R Stat Soc 70(1):141–158
Cai Z, Fan J, Li R (2000a) Efficient estimation and inferences for varying-coefficient models. J Am Stat Assoc 95(451):888–902
Cai Z, Fan J, Yao Q (2000b) Functional-coefficient regression models for nonlinear time series. J Am Stat Assoc 95(451):941–956
Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Welsh AH (1998) Local estimating equations. J Am Stat Assoc 93:214–227
Chiou JM, Ma Y, Tsai CL (2012) Functional random effect time-varying coefficient model for longitudinal data. Statistic 1(1):75–89
Fan J (1993) Local linear regression smoothers and their minimax. Ann Stat 21:196–216
Fan J, Chen J (1999) One-step local quasi-likelihood estimation. J R Stat Soc 61(4):927–943
Fan J, Gijbels I (1996) Local polynomial modelling and its applications: monographs on statistics and applied probability. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Fan J, Huang T, Li R (2007) Analysis of longitudinal data with semiparametric estimation of covariance function. J Am Stat Assoc 102(478):632–641
Hoover DR, Rice JA, Wu CO, Yang LP (1998) Nonparametric smoothing estimates of time-varying coefficient models with longitudinal data. Biometrika 85(4):809–822
Huang JZ, Shen H (2004) Functional coefficient regression models for non-linear time series: a polynomial spline approach. Scand J Stat 31(4):515–534
Huang JZ, Wu CO, Zhou L (2004) Polynomial spline estimation and inference for varying coefficient models with longitudinal data. Statistica Sinica 14(3):763–788
Kuruwita C, Kulasekera K, Gallagher C (2011) Generalized varying coefficient models with unknown link function. Biometrika 98(3):701–710
Lian H (2012) Variable selection for high-dimensional generalized varying-coefficient models. Statistica Sinica 22(3):1563–1588
Lin JG, Zhu LX, Xie FC (2009) Heteroscedasticity diagnostics for t linear regression models. Metrika 70(1):59–77
Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM (1972) Generalized linear models. J Royal Stat Soc Ser A 135:370–384
Ramsay JO (2006) Functional data analysis. Wiley Online Library, New Jersey
Ruppert D, Wand MP (1994) Multivariate weighted least squares regression. Ann Stat 22:1346–1370
Seifert B, Gasser T (1996) Finite-sample variance of local polynomials: analysis and solutions. J Am Stat Assoc 91(433):267–275
Wedderburn RW (1974) Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the GaussNewton method. Biometrika 61(3):439–447
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Editor and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments which have greatly improved this paper. The research work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11171065, 11401094, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China under Grant No. BK20140617, BK20141326 and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China under Grant No. 20120092110021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Proof of the Theorem 1
The expression (17) can be obtained easily according to the expression (16) under some assumptions. For brevity, we outline only the proof of the expression (16). For each given point \(u\), the conditions \(\mathbf C1 \)–\(\mathbf C6 \) proposed in the Sect. 3 are needed. For simplicity, we recall that the vector \(\hat{\xi }(u_0)\) maximizes (9). Here, we consider the normalized estimator
where \(\psi =(nh)^{-1/2}\). Let \(\bar{\eta }(u_0, u, \mathbf x )=\sum \nolimits _{j=1}^p{\left[ b_j(u_0)+ \cdots +b_j^{(m)}(u_0)(u-u_0)\right] x_{j}}\) and \(z_i=\left\{ \mathbf X _i^T, \frac{U_i-u_0}{h}\mathbf X _i^T, \ldots , \frac{(U_i-u_0)^m}{h^m}\mathbf X _i^T \right\} \). It can easily be seen that \(\hat{\xi }^{*}(u_0)\) maximizes
where \(\mu _i=g^{-1}\left( \bar{\eta }(u_0,u,\mathbf x )+\psi \xi ^{*T}(u_0)Z_i\right) \). Equivalently, \(\hat{\xi }^{*}(u_0)\) maximizes
where \(\bar{\mu }_i=\bar{\eta }(u_0, u, \mathbf x ))\). Condition \(\mathbf C5 \) implies that the function \(\ln (\cdot )\) is concave in \(\hat{\xi }^{*}(u_0)\). We have the following expression via a Taylor’s expansion:
where \(\bar{\eta }(u_0)=\bar{\eta }(u_0, u, \mathbf x ),\, \eta _i\) is between \(\bar{\eta }(u_0)\) and \(\bar{\eta }(u_0)+\psi \xi ^{*T}(u_0)\Gamma _i(u_0)\), and
and
Note the fact that \((\Delta _n)_{ij}=(E \Delta _n)_{ij}+ O_p\left\{ \left[ \text {Var}(\Delta _n)_{ij}\right] ^{\frac{1}{2}}\right\} \), and take a Taylor’s expansion of \(\eta (u, \mathbf x )\) with respect to \(u\) around \(|u-u_0|<h\),
and
Therefore, the expect of \(\Delta _n\)
where \(\Pi (u_0)=E(\rho (u, \mathbf x )\mathbf X \mathbf X ^T|U=u)\). Besides, the element of the variance term can be calculated that \(\text {Var}(\Delta _n)_{ij}=E[(\Delta _{nij}-E\Delta _{nij})(\Delta _{nij} -E\Delta _{nij})^T]=O(\psi ^2)\). Therefore,
Next, we will compute the expected value of the absolute of \(\Omega _n\),
since \(q_3\) is linear in \(Y\) with \(E(Y_1|(\mathbf X _1,U_1))<\infty \), we have \(E\left[ |q_3\{\eta _1(u_0), Y_1\}\mathbf X _1^3|\right] <\infty \), therefore, \(E(\Omega _n)=O(\psi )\). Combining the above equations leads to
By the quadratic approximation lemma (Fan and Gijbels 1996), we have
If \(\Xi _n\) is a stochastically bounded sequence of random vectors. The asymptotic normality of \(\xi ^{*}(u_0)\) follows from that of \(\Xi _n\). So, we need to establish the asymptotic normality of \(\Xi _n\). To establish its asymptotic normality, the mean and covariance need to be computed. The mean
where \(U_h=\left( 1, \frac{U-u_0}{h}, \ldots , \left( \frac{U-u_0}{h}\right) ^m\right) ^T,\, \varvec{\theta }=(\theta _{m+1}, \theta _{m+2}, \ldots , \theta _{2m+1})^T\), and \({\mathbf {b}}^{(m+1)}(u_0)=\left[ b^{(m+1)}_1(u_0), \ldots , b^{(m+1)}_p(u_0)\right] ^T\). An application of \(E(\Xi _n)\) calculated above and the definition of \(q_1\), one obtains that
where \(\Lambda (u_0)=\frac{\text {Var}(Y|U=u,\mathbf X =\mathbf x )}{\rho (u, \mathbf x )}\). In order to prove that
we now employ Cramér-Wold device to derive the asymptotic normality of \(\text {Var}(\Xi _n)\): for any unit vector \(\mathbf {e}\),
Combining (23), (24), (25) and (26), one has
Therefore, the Theorem (16) holds true. Besides, it is easy to verify the Lyapounov’s condition for that sequence, that is formula (27) can easily be proved. If \(m=1\) and \(K(\cdot )\) is symmetric, then \(\theta _1=0\), so that (17) holds true. The proof is completed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, YY., Lin, JG. & Huang, XF. Nonparametric estimation in generalized varying-coefficient models based on iterative weighted quasi-likelihood method. Comput Stat 31, 247–268 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-015-0579-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-015-0579-5
Keywords
- Generalized varying-coefficient models
- Nonparametric estimation
- Local polynomial regression
- Weighted quasi-likelihood