Optimal maintenance control of machine tools for energy efficient manufacturing | The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal maintenance control of machine tools for energy efficient manufacturing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance of machine tool tends to deteriorate in the production process. This deterioration increases the processing energy consumption and leads to more defectives and corresponding energy waste. Maintenance can be taken to restore the performance of machine tool and improve the energy efficiency, which has a significant impact on the total energy consumption and productivity. This paper proposes an approach to improve the energy efficiency of the production process through scheduling the maintenance actions of the machine tool, taking into account productivity, product quality, and energy consumption. The deteriorating machine tool is modeled as a discrete-time, discrete-state Markov process. Partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) framework is applied to develop the maintenance decision-making model, where the joint observation of processing energy consumption and quality of manufactured workpiece is used to infer the status of the machine tool. An optimal maintenance policy maximizing the total expected reward about energy efficiency over a finite horizon is obtained, which consists of a sequence of decision rules corresponding to the optimal action for each belief vector. The characteristics of the optimal policy are illustrated through a numerical example and the effects of parameters on the policy are analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdelaziz EA, Saidur R, Mekhilef S (2011) A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(1):150–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu F, Wang Q, Liu G (2013) Content architecture and future trends of energy efficiency research on machining systems. J Mech Eng(49)19:87-94 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oda Y, Mori M, Ogawa K, Nishida S, Fujishima M, Kawamura T (2012) Study of optimal cutting condition for energy efficiency improvement in ball end milling with tool-workpiece inclination. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):119–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shao H, Wang H, Zhao X (2004) A cutting power model for tool wear monitoring in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(14):1503–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu M (2007) Smart machining system platform for cnc milling with the integration of a power sensor and cutting model. Dissertation, University of New Hampshire

  6. Xuan Z, Lu C (2009) Analysis on tool wear and cutting force of Si3N4 diamond coated tools in high speed machining. Mach Tool Hydr 37(11):45-48 (in Chinese

  7. Dietmair A, Verl A (2009) A generic energy consumption model for decision making and energy efficiency optimisation in manufacturing. Int J Sustain Eng 2(2):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Drake R, Yildirim MB, Twomey J, Whitman L, Ahmad J, Lodhia P(2006)Data collection framework on energy consumption in manufacturing. In: IIE Annual Conference and Exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA

  9. Gutowski T, Dahmus J, Thiriez A (2006) Electrical energy requirements for manufacturing processes. In: 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Leuven, Belgium

  10. Spaan MT, Vlassis N (2005) Perseus: randomized point-based value iteration for POMDPs. J Artif Intell Res 24:195–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Diaz N, Choi S, Helu M, Chen Y, Jayanathan S, Yasui Y, Kong D, Pavanaskar S, Dornfeld D (2010). Machine tool design and operation strategies for green manufacturing. In: Proceedings of 4th CIRP International Conference on High Performance Cutting, Gifu, Japan, 271–276

  12. Kroll L, Blau P, Wabner M, Frieß U, Eulitz J, Klärner M (2011) Lightweight components for energy-efficient machine tools. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 4(2):148–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajemi MF, Mativenga PT, Aramcharoen A (2010) Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations. J Clean Prod 18(10):1059–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mori M, Fujishima M, Inamasu Y, Oda Y (2011) A study on energy efficiency improvement for machine tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):145–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu S, Liu F, He Y, Hu T (2012) No-load energy parameter characteristics of computerized numerical control machine tool main transmission system. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 18(2):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mouzon G, Yildirim MB, Twomey J (2007) Operational methods for minimization of energy consumption of manufacturing equipment. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4247–4271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi J, Liu F, Xu D, Chen G (2009) Decision model and practical method of energy-saving in nc machine tool. Chin Mech Eng 20(11):1344-1346( in Chinese)

  18. Shrouf F, Ordieres-Meré J, García-Sánchez A, Ortega-Mier M (2014) Optimizing the production scheduling of a single machine to minimize total energy consumption costs. J Clean Prod 67:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen G, Zhang L, Arinez J, Biller S (2013) Energy-efficient production systems through schedule-based operations. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 10(1):27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cao H, Tao X, Liu F (2010) An energy saving scheduling model for machine tools and its application. Mech Sci Tech 29(6):744–748 (in Chinese)

  21. Xu W, Cao L (2014) Energy efficiency analysis of machine tools with periodic maintenance. Int J Prod Res 52(18):5273–5285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smallwood RD, Sondik EJ (1973) The optimal control of partially observable markov processes over a finite horizon. Oper Res 21(5):1071–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Papakonstantinou KG, Shinozuka M (2014a) Optimum inspection and maintenance policies for corroded structures using partially observable markov decision processes and stochastic, physically based models. Probab Eng Mech 37:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Anily S, Grosfeld-Nir A (2006) An optimal lot-sizing and offline inspection policy in the case of nonrigid demand. Oper Res 54(2):311–323

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Ivy JS, Pollock SM (2005) Marginally monotonic maintenance policies for a multi-state deteriorating machine with probabilistic monitoring, and silent failures. IEEE Trans Reliab 54(3):489–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meola G (2007) Bayes-optimal control policy for a deteriorating machine based on continuous measurements of the manufactured parts. Dissertation, Polytechnic University of Milan

  27. AlDurgam MM, Duffuaa SO (2009) Maximizing overall system effectiveness (OSE) for three-state, partially observable system. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on modeling, simulation and applied optimization, Sharjah, UAE, 20–22 January

  28. AlDurgam MM, Duffuaa SO (2013) Optimal joint maintenance and operation policies to maximise overall systems effectiveness. Int J Prod Res 51(5):1319–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chiang JH, Yuan J (2001) Optimal maintenance policy for a markovian system under periodic inspection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 71(2):165–172

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Ben-Zvi T, Grosfeld-Nir A (2013) Partially observed markov decision processes with binomial observations. Oper Res Lett 41(2):201–206

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Le MD, Tan CM (2013) Optimal maintenance strategy of deteriorating system under imperfect maintenance and inspection using mixed inspection scheduling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 113:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bertsekas DP, Tsitsiklis JN (2008) Introduction to probability, 2nd edn. Athena Scientific, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xu W, Cao L (2015) Optimal tool replacement with product quality deterioration and random tool failure. Int J Prod Res 53(6):1736–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Papakonstantinou KG, Shinozuka M (2014c) Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and markov processes. Part II: POMDP implementation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 130:214–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thiede S (2012) Energy efficiency in manufacturing systems. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Papakonstantinou KG, Shinozuka M (2014b) Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and markov processes. Part I: theory. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 130:202–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Le Cao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, W., Cao, L. Optimal maintenance control of machine tools for energy efficient manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104, 3303–3311 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2233-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2233-1

Keywords

Navigation