Abstract.
We investigate the theories of linear algebra, which were originally defined to study the question of whether commutativity of matrix inverses has polysize Frege proofs. We give sentences separating quantified versions of these theories, and define a fragment in which we can interpret a weak theory V1 of bounded arithmetic and carry out polynomial time reasoning about matrices - for example, we can formalize the Gaussian elimination algorithm. We show that, even if we restrict our language, proves the commutativity of inverses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkowitz, S.J.: On computing the determinant in small parallel time using a small number of processors. Inf. Proc. Lett. 18 (3), 147–150 (1984)
Bonet M.L., Buss, S.R., Pitassi, T.: Are there hard examples for frege proof systems? In: P. Clote, J. Remmel (eds.), Feasible mathematics II, Birkhauser, Boston, 1995, pp. 30–56
Buss, S.R.: Bounded Arithmetic. Bibliopolis, Naples, 1986
Cook, S.A.: A taxonomy of problems with fast parallel algorithms. Inf. Com. 64 (13), 2–22 (1985)
Dummit, D.S., Foote, R.M.: Abstract algebra. Prentice Hall, 1991
Soltys, M.: The complexity of derivations of matrix identities. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, 2001. Available from the ECCC server;see http://www.eccc.uni-trier.de/eccc-local/ECCC-Theses/soltys.html
Soltys, M., Cook, S.A.: The proof complexity of linear algebra. In: Seventeenth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2002). IEEE Computer Society, 2002
Zambella, D.: Notes on polynomially bounded arithmetic. J. Symbolic Logic 61 (3), 942–966 (1996)
Acknowledgments.
The authors would like to thank Steve Cook for the very helpful conversations that led to this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was done while a postdoctoral research fellow at the Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thapen, N., Soltys, M. Weak theories of linear algebra. Arch. Math. Logic 44, 195–208 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-004-0249-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-004-0249-8