What is it like to encounter an autonomous artificial agent? | AI & SOCIETY Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

What is it like to encounter an autonomous artificial agent?

  • 25TH ANNIVERSARY VOLUME A FAUSTIAN EXCHANGE: WHAT IS IT TO BE HUMAN IN THE ERA OF UBIQUITOUS TECHNOLOGY?
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following up on Thomas Nagel’s paper “What is it like to be a bat?” and Alan Turing’s essay “Computing machinery and intelligence,” it shall be claimed that a successful interaction of human beings and autonomous artificial agents depends more on which characteristics human beings ascribe to the agent than on whether the agent really has those characteristics. It will be argued that Masahiro Mori’s concept of the “uncanny valley” as well as evidence from several empirical studies supports that assertion. Finally, some tentative conclusions concerning moral implications of the arguments presented here shall be drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Breazeal C (2001) Affective interaction between humans and robots. Adv Artif Life LNCS 2159:582–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal C, Brooks R (2004) Robot emotions: a functional perspective. In: Fellous J, Arbib M (eds) Who needs emotions?. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 271–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano G, Peters Chr (2010) Socially perceptive robots: challenges and concerns. Interact Stud 11:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh M (2011) Humans, animals, and robots: a phenomenological approach to human-robot relations. Int J Soc Robot 3:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draude CL (2011) Intermediaries: reflections on virtual humans, gender, and the uncanny valley. AI Soc 26:319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman B, Kahn PH Jr (1992) Human agency and responsible computing: implications for Computer System Design. J Syst Softw 17:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbister K, Doyle P (2005) The blind men and the elephant revisited. In: Ruttkay Zs, Pelachaud C (eds) From brows to trust: evaluating embodied conversational agents. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 3–26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro H, Nishio Sh (2007) Building artificial humans to understand humans. J Artif Organs 10:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd CD, Taggart W, Turkle S (2006) A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 3972–3976

  • Koda T, Ishida T, Rehm M, André E (2009) Avatar culture: cross-cultural evaluations of avatar facial expressions. AI Soc 24:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Rau P, Li Y (2010) A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task. Int J Soc Robot 2:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDorman K, Vasudevan S, Ho Ch–Ch (2009) Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI Soc 23:485–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misselhorn C (2009) Empathy with inanimate objects and the uncanny valley. Mind Mach 19:345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7:33–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel Th (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev 83:435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickenberg R, Reeves B (2000) The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI’00 conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey N, Sharkey A (2010) The crying shame of robot nannies: an ethical appraisal. Interact Stud 11:161–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater M, Antley A, Davison A, Swapp D, Guger Chr, Barker Chr, Pistrang N, Sanchez-Vives MV (2006) A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE 1:e39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiehl WD, Breazeal C (2005) Affective touch for robotic companions. Affect Comput Intell Interact LNCS 3784:747–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart W, Turkle S, Kidd CD (2005) An interactive robot in a nursing home: preliminary remarks. Toward social mechanisms of android science. Cognitive Science Society, Stresa/Italy, pp 56–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 54:433–457

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Walters M, Syrdal D, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Koay Kh (2008) Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton Robots 24:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty 1, Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Computer Science, PO Box 101344, 03013, Cottbus, Germany

    Karsten Weber

Authors
  1. Karsten Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karsten Weber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, K. What is it like to encounter an autonomous artificial agent?. AI & Soc 28, 483–489 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0453-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0453-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation