Abstract
Usually, the shape of the future is seen as the result of a cultural flow that, according to some privileged cultural variable, like technology, goes undisturbed towards its own outcome. This is a quite naive attitude that has been very rarely successful. Both conventional technology and technology of the artificial show that, within culture, ‘demons’ are always active trying to exploit or even bypass standards in order to give birth to unexpected novelties. This is true within the pure technology area and even more in its artistic extensions. Therefore, no deterministic process is going on but, rather, a permanent remixing of chances that makes any prophecy impossible.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bensaude-Vincent B, Newman WR (2007) The artificial and the natural an evolving polarity. MIT Press, USA
Benyus J (1997) Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature. William Morrow & Company, New York
Bertasio D (2010) Storia di un sogno imperfetto. Viaggio intorno all’originale, alla copia e al doppio. Studi di Sociologia, Milano
Biomechanics (1999) Theoretical design of various types of joints, Internet Site, http://biomed.brown.edu/Courses/BI108/BI108_1999_Groups/ Fingerprosth_Team/BiomechTheory.html
Boas F (1927) Primitive Art, Oslo: Instituttet for sammenli-gnende kulturforskning, 1927, it. trans., Arte primitiva, Torino, Boringhieri, 1981, p. 174
de Solla Price D (1964) Automata and the origin of mechanism. Technol Cult 1
Needham J (1975) Science and civilization in China. C ambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 53
Negrotti M (1999) The theory of the artificial. Intellect Books, Exeter
Negrotti M (2002) Naturoids. On the nature of the artificial. World Scientific Publishing Company, New Jersey
Negrotti M (2010) Naturoids: from dream to a paradox, ‘Futures’, London, 42
Pirandello L (1908) Arte e Scienza. W. Modes Bookseller-Publisher, Rome, p 106
Popper KR (1974) Replies to my critics. In: Schilpp PA (ed) The philosophy of karl popper. La Salle, Illinois, p 1186
Rosen R (1993) Bionics Revisited. In: Haken H, Karlqvist A, Svedin U (eds) The machine as metaphor and tool. Springer, Berlin
Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Tarde G (1890) Les lois de l’imitation. Félix Alcan, Paris
The Whitaker Foundation (1995) Annual report: tissue engineering, Internet Site, http://fairway.ecn.purdue.edu/bme/whitaker/95_annual_report/ tissue95.html
Videm V (2008) Neuthrophil-biomaterial interactions. In: GE Wnek, GL Bowlin, Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering. vol 3, Informa Healthcare, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Negrotti, M. Cultural ‘demons’ as future builders. AI & Soc 28, 65–73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0402-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0402-6