Abstract
In this short paper—little more than a note, even a short “contrarian” sermon for this anniversary volume—what I do is argue that even the allegedly most “revolutionary” inventions of our computer-driven age are not revolutionary in the sense that their impacts are “driving” society. Some of them are genuinely revolutionary, I admit, but in the reverse direction. The inventions don’t “impact societies”; rather, particular communities within society use the technical languages that are at their core, invent them, embed them in machines, and so on. It is not inventions but particular groups within modern—and so-called postmodern—societies that have invented and use technical languages which are embedded in gadgets that are said to “drive” modern or postmodern societies. And they do so only in one sense: they were invented and are used by various communities in our kinds of societies for a variety of ends. And if this is so, and if we feel those ends are undemocratic or positively anti-democratic, I conclude that we should resist them any way we can, even politically.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Berger P, Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality. Doubleday, New York
Blumer H (1969) Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Carreira da Silva F (2011) G.H. Mead: a reader. Routledge, London
Durbin PT (1992) Social responsibility in science, technology, and medicine. Lehigh University Press, Bethlehem, PA (see chapter 8)
Durbin PT (2007) Philosophy, activism, and computer and information specialists. ACM Ubiquity 8(45) (November 13, 2007–November 19, 2007). Unnumbered pages, online journal
Durbin PT (2010) Philosophy, activism, and computer and information specialists revisited. AI & Society 25(1):119–122
Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Goldman S (2009) Information, innovation and society. In: Amichai-Hamburger Y (ed) Technology and human well-being. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Joas H (1985) G. H. Mead: a contemporary re-examination of his thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Mead GH (1934) Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Straker D (2010) See his website: creatingminds.org. Accessed 2010
Winner L (2010) Cyberlibertarian Myths and the Prospects for Community. http://www.langdonwinner.org. Accessed 2010
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Durbin, P.T. A contrarian view of postmodern society and information technologies. AI & Soc 28, 51–54 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0391-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0391-5