Abstract
Along with the rapid growth of editorial systems and publishers, the number of research articles is increasing, which creates a need for an effective dissemination strategy. Researchers commonly use editorial systems in a candid manner. However, when researchers concurrently submit the same contribution in more than one editorial system, it is considered unethical. In this paper, we propose a novel approach called DeMSum for detecting such duplicate submissions. DeMSum verifies a manuscript (MS) by processing the MS attributes that are accessed through the editorial system. To the best of our knowledge, DeMSum is the first system to address the double submission issue, thus enabling the use of diverse editorial systems for MS review. We implemented a prototype, and our evaluation of the prototype produced excellent results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cope. (1999). Guidelines on good publication practice. Resource document. Committee on Publication Ethics. http://publicationethics.org/files/u7141/1999pdf13.pdf. Accessed 25 December 2016.
Kolhar, M., Abu-Alhaj, M. M., & El-atty, S. M. A. (2017). Cloud data auditing techniques with a focus on privacy and security. IEEE Security and Privacy, 15(1), 42–51.
Schulzrinne, H. (2009). Double submissions: Publishing misconduct or just effective dissemination? ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(3), 40–42.
Stone, W. R. (2003). Plagiarism, duplicate publication, and duplicate submission: They are all wrong! IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 45(4), 47–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kolhar, M., Alameen, A. & AlMudara, S.B.B. A Proposal to Detect the Double Submission of a Manuscript Sent for Review. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 1315–1329 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9958-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9958-3