2D-GolgiTrack—a semi-automated tracking system to quantify morphological changes and dynamics of the Golgi apparatus and Golgi-derived membrane tubules | Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

2D-GolgiTrack—a semi-automated tracking system to quantify morphological changes and dynamics of the Golgi apparatus and Golgi-derived membrane tubules

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Golgi apparatus and membrane tubules derived from this organelle play essential roles in membrane trafficking in eukaryotic cells. High-resolution live cell imaging is one highly suitable method for studying the molecular mechanisms of dynamics of organelles during membrane trafficking events. Due to the complex morphological changes and dynamic movements of the Golgi apparatus and associated membrane tubules during membrane trafficking, it is challenging to accurately quantify them. In this study, a semi-automated 2D tracking system, 2D-GolgiTrack, has been established for quantifying morphological changes and movements of Golgi elements, specifically encompassing the Golgi apparatus and its associated tubules, the fission and fusion of Golgi tubules, and the kinetics of formation of Golgi tubules and redistribution of the Golgi-associated protein Rab6A to the endoplasmic reticulum. The Golgi apparatus and associated tubules are segmented by a combination of Otsu’s method and adaptive local normalization thresholding. Curvilinear skeletons and tips of skeletons of segmented tubules are used for calculating tubule length by the Geodesic method. The k-nearest neighbor is applied to search the possible candidate objects in the next frame and link the correct objects of adjacent frames by a tracking algorithm to calculate changes in morphological features of each Golgi object or tubule, e.g., number, length, shape, branch point and position, and fission or fusion events. Tracked objects are classified into morphological subtypes, and the Track-Map function of morphological evolution visualizes events of fission and fusion. Our 2D-GolgiTrack not only provides tracking results with 95% accuracy, but also maps morphological evolution for fast visual interpretation of the fission and fusion events. Our tracking system is able to characterize key morphological and dynamic features of the Golgi apparatus and associated tubules, enabling biologists to gain a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms of membrane traffic involving this essential organelle.

Overview of the semi-automated 2D tracking system. There are two main parts to the system, namely detection and tracking. The workflow process requires a raw sequence of images (a), which is filtered by the Gaussian filter method (c), and threshold intensity (b) to segment elements of Golgi cisternae (d) and tubules (e). Post-processing outputs are binary images of the cisternae area and tubule skeletons. The tubules are classified into three lengths, namely short, medium, and long tubules (f). Outputs of segmentation are calculated as morphological features (g). The tracking processing starts by loading the segmented outputs (h) and key-inputs of direction reference (i; (DR)) and interval setting of the start ((S)) and end ((E)) frame numbers (j). A tubule of interest is selected by the user (k; (GTinterest, S) as the tubule input ((GTIN)) at the current frame ((i = S)). The tracking algorithm tracks and links the correct tubules at each subsequent frame ((i = i + 1)). The locations of tubule tips are determined for detecting tubule branches using the (DR) to identify the direction of tubule growth (l: (1); (GTtipBr, i); Golgi cisternae: white area; Golgi tubule: white skeleton; tubule tips: green dots; branched tubules: two branches due to the (DR) of growth of the simulated tubule moving from left-to-right away from the Golgi cisternae location). According to the position of the (GTIN), five candidates ((GTcandidates, i)) are searched using the k-nearest neighbor method (l: (2)). Matching of tubules between the (GTIN) and those (GTcandidates, i) uses the bounding box technique to check the amount of tubule-overlap based on the tracking conditions (l: (3)). If there is tubule-overlap, the system collects that tubule as the final output ((GTOUT, i)). By contrast, shape (see the Extent feature in Table reftab:1) and distance features are used to generate the tracked output, which has a priority of a minimum of both of these features ((MinDIST, EXTENT)); otherwise, it is from the minimum of the distance ((MinDIST)). Once a loop of the interval track to the last frame is finished ((i = E + 1)), a Track-Map is generated allowing visualization of the morphological pattern of tubule formation and movement, including identification of fission and fusion events (m). Dynamic features are calculated (n). Related outputs are saved, and all features obtained from the detection and tracking processing are exported as MS Excel files (o).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GC:

Golgi cisternae

GT:

Golgi-derived tubules

ER:

endoplasmic reticulum

COPI:

coat protein complex I

ARF1:

ADP-ribosylation factor-1

BFA:

Brefeldin A

TGN:

trans-Golgi network

YFP:

yellow fluorescent protein

DR:

direction reference

ALNT:

adaptive local normalization thresholding

k NN:

k-nearest neighbor

MSD:

mean-square displacement

References

  1. Chen X, Williams J A (2003) Encyclopedia of gastroenterology. In: Johnson L R (ed) Exocytosis. Elsevier, Massachusetts, pp 777–779

  2. Patterson G H, Hirschberg K, Polishchuk R S, Gerlich D, Phair R D, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2008) Transport through the Golgi apparatus by rapid partitioning within a two-phase membrane system. Cell 133(6):1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tenorio M J, Luchsinger C, Mardones G A (2015) Protein kinase A activity is necessary for fission and fusion of Golgi to Endoplasmic Reticulum retrograde tubules. PLoS One 10(8):e0135260. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Valente C, Polishchuk R, De Matteis M A (2010) Rab6 Myosin II at the cutting edge of membrane fission. Nat Cell Biol 12(7):635–638. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb0710-635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bottanelli F, Kilian N, Ernst A M, Rivera-Molina F, Schroeder L K, Kromann E B, Lessard M D, Erdmann R S, Schepartz A, Baddeley D, Bewersdorf J, Toomre D, Rothman J E (2017) A novel physiological role for ARF1 in the formation of bidirectional tubules from the Golgi. Mol Biol Cell 28 (12):1676–1687. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e16-12-0863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heffernan L F, Simpson J C (2014) The trials and tubule-ations of Rab6 involvement in golgi-to-ER retrograde transport. Biochem Soc Trans 42(5):1453–1459. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20140178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen L, Liu T, Tran A, Lu X, Tomilov A A, Davies V, Cortopassi G, Chiamvimonvat N, Bers D M, Votruba M, Knowlton A A (2012) OPA1 Mutation and late-onset cardiomyopathy: mitochondrial dysfunction and mtDNA instability. J Am Heart Assoc 1(5):e003012. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.003012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Twig G, Elorza A, Molina A, Mohamed H, Wikstrom J D, Walzer G, Stiles L, Haigh S E, Katz S, Las G, Alroy J, Wu M, Py B F, Yuan J, Deeney J T, Corkey B E, Shirihai O S (2008) Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. EMBO J 27(2):433–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang X, Su B, Lee H, Li X, Perry G, Smith M A, Zhu X (2009) Impaired balance of mitochondrial fission and fusion in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Neurosci 29(28):9090–103. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1357-09.2009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Knott A B, Perkins G, Schwarzenbacher R, Bossy-Wetzel E (2008) Mitochondrial fragmentation in neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(7):505–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee Y J, Nagano Y, Taylor J P, Lim K L, Yao T P (2010) Disease-causing mutations in Parkin impair mitochondrial ubiquitination, aggregation, an HDAC6-dependent mitophagy. J Cell Biol 189(4):671–9. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201001039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bexiga M G, Simpson J C (2013) Human diseases associated with form and function of the Golgi complex. Int J Mol Sci 14(9):18670–81. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140918670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pepperkok R, Simpson J C, Rietdorf J, Cetin C, Liebel U, Terjung S, Zimmermann T (2005) Imaging platforms for measurement of membrane trafficking. Methods Enzymol 404:8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(05)04002-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Neumann B, Walter T, Hériché J K, Bulkescher J, Erfle H, Conrad C, Rogers P, Poser I, Held M, Liebel U, Cetin C, Sieckmann F, Pau G, Kabbe R, Wünsche A, Satagopam V, Schmitz M H, Chapuis C, Gerlich D W, Schneider R, Eils R, Huber W, Peters J M, Hyman A A, Durbin R, Pepperkok R, Ellenberg J (2010) Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes. Nature 464(7289):721–727. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chenouard N, Smal I, Chaumont F, Maška M, Sbalzarini I F, Gong Y, Cardinale J, Carthel C, Coraluppi S, Winter M, Cohen A R, Godinez W J, Rohr K, Kalaidzidis Y, Liang L, Duncan J, Shen H, Xu Y, Magnusson K E G, Jaldén J, Blau H M, Paul-Gilloteaux P, Roudot P, Kervrann C, Waharte F, Tinevez J -Y, Shorte S L, Willemse J, Celler K, Wezel G P, Dan H -W, Tsai Y -S, Solórzano C, Olivo-Marin J -C, Meijering E (2014) Objective comparison of particle tracking methods. Nat Methods 11(3):281–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2808

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meijering E, Dzyubachyk O, Smal I (2012) Methods for cell and particle tracking. Methods Enzymol 504:183–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-391857-4.00009-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S -Q, Fu C -L, Zhang Y, Chen Q, Long M (2010) Dynamics of morphological changes for mitochondrial fission and fusion. Sci China Phys Mech 53(4):680–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-010-0163-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Westrate L M, Drocco J A, Martin K R, Hlavacek W S, MacKeigan J P (2014) Mitochondrial morphological features are associated with fission and fusion events. PLoS One 9(4):e95265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wait E, Winter M, Bjornsson C, Kokovay E, Wang Y, Goderie S, Temple S, Cohen A R (2014) Visualization and correction of automated segmentation, tracking and lineaging from 5-D stem cell image sequences. BMC Bioinform 15:328. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Matov A, Applegate K, Kumar P, Thoma C, Krek W, Danuser G, Wittmann T (2010) Analysis of microtubule dynamic instability using a plus-end growth marker. Nat Methods 7(9):761–768. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Applegate KT, Besson S, Matov A, Bagonis MH, Jaqaman K, Danuser G (2011) plusTipTracker: Quantitative image analysis software for the measurement of microtubule dynamics. J Struct Biol 176(2):168–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2011.07.009

  22. Saban M, Altinok A, Peck A, Kenney C, Feinstein S, Wilson L, Rose K, Manjunath BS (2006) Automated tracking and modeling of microtubule dynamics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: nano to macro. IEEE, pp 1032–1035. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2006.1625097

  23. Nussbaum-Krammer C I, Neto M F, Brielmann R M, Pedersen J S, Morimoto R I (2015) Investigating the spreading and toxicity of Prion-like proteins using the metazoan model organism C. elegans. J Vis Exp (95):52321. https://doi.org/10.3791/52321

  24. Peng J -Y, Lin C -C, Chen Y -J, Kao L -S, Liu Y -C, Chou C -C, Huang Y -H, Chang F -R, Wu Y -C, Tsai Y -S, Hsu C -N (2011) Automatic morphological subtyping reveals new roles of Caspases in mitochondrial dynamics. PLOS Comput Biol 7(10):e1002212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng J-Y, Hsu C-N, Lin C-C (2010) Adaptive image enhancement for fluorescence microscopy. In: 2010 international conference on technologies and applications of artificial intelligence (TAAI). IEEE, pp 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI.2010.13

  26. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb 9(1):62–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tineveza J -Y, Perrya N, Schindelinb J, Hoopesc G M, Reynoldsc G D, Laplantined E, Bednarekc S Y, Shortea S L, Eliceiribe K W (2017) Trackmate: An open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking. Methods 115:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaqaman K, Loerke D, Mettlen M, Kuwata H, Grinstein S, Schmid S L, Danuser G (2008) Robust single particle tracking in live cell time-lapse sequences. Nat Methods 5(8):695–702. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lantuejoul C, Beucher S (1981) On the use of the geodesic metric in image analysis. J Microsc 121(1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1981.tb01197.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ku T -C, Kao L -S, Lin C -C, Tsai Y -S (2009) Morphological filter improve the efficiency of automated tracking of secretory vesicles with various dynamic properties. Microsc Res Tech 72 (9):639–649. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Godinez W J, Lampe M, Wörz S, Müller B, Eils R, Rohr K (2009) Deterministic and probabilistic approaches for tracking virus particles in time-lapse fluorescence microscopy image sequences. Med Image Anal 13(2):325–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2008.12.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tseng Y, Kole T P, Wirtz D (2002) Micromechanical mapping of live cells by multiple-particle-tracking microrheology. Biophys J 83(6):3162–3176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75319-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Apgar J, Tseng Y, Fedorov E, Herwig M B, Almo S C, Wirtz D (2000) Multiple-particle tracking measurements of heterogeneities in solutions of actin filaments and actin bundles. Biophys J 79(2):1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76363-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jaeger S, Song Q, Chen S -S (2009) DYNAMIK: A Software environment for cell DYNAmics, motility, and information tracking, with an application to Ras pathways. Bioinformatics 25(18):2383–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang R, Perez-Riverol Y, Hermjakob H, Vizcaíno J A (2015) Open source libraries and frameworks for biological data visualisation: a guide for developers. Proteomics 15(8):1356–1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201400377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Talevich E, Invergo B M, Cock P J A, Chapman B A (2012) Bio.phylo: a unified toolkit for processing, analyzing and visualizing phylogenetic trees in Biopython. BMC Bioinforma 13:209. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Koskinen V R, Emery P A, Creasy D M, Cottrell J S (2011) Hierarchical clustering of shotgun proteomics data. Mol Cell Proteomics 003822(6):M110. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M110.003822

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shneiderman B, Wattenberg M (2001) Ordered treemap layouts. In: IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. INFOVIS https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2001.963283

  39. Wang S, Xiao W, Shan S, Jiang C, Chen M, Zhang Y, Lü S, Chen J, Zhang C, Chen Q, Long M (2012) Multi-patterned dynamics of mitochondrial fission and fusion in a living cell. PLoS One 7(5):e19879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Dan H -W, Hung W -C, Tsai Y -S, Lin C -C (2014) 3D Image processing for mitochondria morphology variation analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on bioelectronics and bioinformatics (ISBB). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBB.2014.6820953

  41. Dan (2020) Calculate blur kernel from original and blurry images https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/54944-calculate-blur-kernel-from-original-and-blurry-images, MATLAB Central File Exchange: Retrieved April 15, 2020

  42. Zhang Y (2020) 2D/3D image segmentation toolbox https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/24998-2d-3d-image-segmentation-toolbox, MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved April 15

  43. Chan T F, Vese L A (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10 (2):266–277. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.902291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Achanta R, Hemami S, Estrada F, Susstrunk S (2009) Frequency-tuned salient region detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206596

  45. Fenga Y, Guoa H, Zhanga H, Lia C, Suna L, Muticc S, Jid S, Huc Y (2016) A modified fuzzy C-means method for segmenting MR images using non-local information. Technol Health Care 24:S785–S793. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Feng Y, Dong F, Xia X, Hu C -H, Fan Q, Hu Y, Gao M, Mutic S (2017) An adaptive Fuzzy C-means method utilizing neighboring information for breast tumor segmentation in ultrasound images. Med Phys 44(7):3752–3760. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-161208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang J -S, Valente C, Polishchuk R S, Turacchio G, Layre E, Moody D B, Leslie C C, Gelb M H, Brown W J, Corda D, Luini A, Hsu V W (2011) COPI Acts in both vesicular and tubular transport. Nat Cell Biol 13(8):996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan R.O.C. under Grant No. MOST 107-2221-E-033-023-MY2. LFH was supported by a postgraduate fellowship from the Irish Research Council (IRC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Jindaporn Yaothak & Yuh-Show Tsai

  2. Cell Screening Laboratory, School of Biology and Environmental Science, Science Centre West, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland

    Jeremy C. Simpson & Linda F. Heffernan

  3. Department of Life Sciences and Institute of Genome Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Chung-Chih Lin

  4. Biophotonics Interdisciplinary Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Chung-Chih Lin

  5. Brain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Chung-Chih Lin

Authors
  1. Jindaporn Yaothak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy C. Simpson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda F. Heffernan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuh-Show Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chung-Chih Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JCS and LFH collected the image data. Conceptualization and study design was performed by JY, YST, and CCL; methodology by JY and YST; implementation by JY; and validation by YST, CCL, and JCS. All authors interpreted the results data. JY, CCL, and JCS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuh-Show Tsai or Chung-Chih Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaothak, J., Simpson, J.C., Heffernan, L.F. et al. 2D-GolgiTrack—a semi-automated tracking system to quantify morphological changes and dynamics of the Golgi apparatus and Golgi-derived membrane tubules. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 151–169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02460-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-021-02460-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation