Access to public information: a scientometric study of legal versus voluntary transparency in the public sector | Scientometrics Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Access to public information: a scientometric study of legal versus voluntary transparency in the public sector

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify, synthesise and evaluate the current state of research into transparency in the public sector, with respect to the period 2005–2014, in order to provide a critical overview of published trends in this field and to identify future areas of interest. Specifically, we focus on the questions of mandatory and voluntary transparency that arouse most interest among researchers, institutions and journals in this field, with particular attention to the methodological aspects of the studies considered. To achieve these aims, various scientometric approaches are applied to articles included in the 2014 edition of the ISI Journal Citation Reports database for the research areas “Public Administration”, “Political Science” and “Information and Library Science”. During the past ten years the number of studies published in this field has increased considerably, particularly as regards voluntary transparency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source The authors

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Source The authors

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcaide-Muñoz, L., López-Hernández, A. M., & Rodríguez- Bolívar, M. P. (2012). La investigación en e-Gobierno referida a economías emergentes: evolución y tendencias futuras. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 54, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. E., & Lowry, R. C. (2010). Transparency and accountability: Empirical results for US States. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 22(4), 379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C. L. (2011). Providing a clearer view: An examination of transparency on local government websites. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 11–16.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Azfar, O., & Nelson, W. R., Jr. (2007). Transparency, wages, and the separation of powers: An experimental analysis of corruption. Public Choice, 130(3–4), 471–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braadbaart, O., & Yusnandarshah, B. (2008). Public sector benchmarking: A survey of scientific articles, 1990—2005. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(3), 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caba-Pérez, C., López-Hernández, A. M., & Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P. (2005). Citizens’ access to on-line governmental financial information: Practices in the European Union countries. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 258–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárcaba García, A. I., & García García, J. (2010). Determinants of online reporting of accounting information by Spanish local government authorities. Local Government Studies, 36(5), 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrillo-i-Martínez, A. (2011). The regulation of diffusion of public sector information via electronic means: Lessons from the Spanish regulation. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 188–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, M., & McMenemy, D. (2013). Freedom of information and ‘vexatious’ requests—The case of Scottish local government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(3), 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R. K., & Gazley, B. (2008). Capacity for public administration: Analysis of meaning and measurement. Public Administration and Development, 28(4), 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coglianese, C. (2009). The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government. Governance, 22(4), 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Reichardt, C. (2004). Métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos en investigación evaluativa (5th ed.). Editorial Morata: Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. M. (1984). The integrative research review: A systematic approach (Applied social research methods series) (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, C., & Meade, E. E. (2008). Central bank independence and transparency: Evolution and effectiveness. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(4), 763–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2014). The impact of functional decentralization and externalization on local government transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fine Licht, J. (2011). Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy. Scandinavian Political Studies, 34(3), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escaleras, M., Lin, S., & Register, C. (2010). Freedom of information acts and public sector corruption. Public Choice, 145(3), 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (2010). Is transparency the best disinfectant? Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(4), 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. P., & Watson, S. S. (1994). An assessment of public administration journals: The perspective of editors and editorial board members. Public Administration Review, 54(5), 474–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. (2000). QSR Nvivo. NUDIST Vivo. Reference Guide. Malaysia. QSR International Pty. Ltd. Melbourne Australia.

  • Gandía, J. L., & Archidona, M. C. (2008). Determinants of web site information by Spanish city councils. Online Information Review, 32(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Sánchez, I., Frías, J., & Rodríguez, L. (2013). Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39(2013), 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science (New York, NY), 178(4060), 471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebel, A. C. (2012). Human nature and morality in the anti-corruption discourse of transparency international. Public Administration and Development, 32(1), 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. D. (1982). Citation ranking versus subjective evaluation in the determination of journal hierarchies in the social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(1), 55–57. doi:10.1002/asi.4630330109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2012). The effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, R., & Worthy, B. (2010). Assessing the performance of freedom of information. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 352–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heald, D. (2012). Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2007). What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? Public Management Review, 9(2), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, R. (2006). Does more transparency go along with better governance? Economics and Politics, 18(2), 121–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, P. T. (2007). Information policy, information access, and democratic participation: The national and international implications of the Bush administration’s information politics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 840–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, Klaus. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Z., & Anders, K. K. (2000). A paradigmatic view of contemporary public administration research: An empirical test. Administration and Society, 32(2), 138–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laswad, F., Fisher, R., & Oyelere, P. (2005). Determinants of voluntary Internet financial reporting by local government authorities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(2), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. K. (2003). A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore. Scientometrics, 56(1), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, J. S., Jr., & Devore, J. (1987). Measuring productivity in U.S. public administration and public affairs programs 1981–1985. Administration and Society, 19(2), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Coudounaris, D. N. (2010). Five decades of business research into exporting: A bibliographic analysis. Journal of International Management, 16(1), 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Li, X., Li, Z., Zeng, D. D., & Scherer, W. T. (2010). A bibliographic analysis of the IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems literature. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 11(2), 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010). Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. (2005). Visualizing the intellectual structure in urban studies: A journal co-citation analysis (1992–2002). Scientometrics, 62(3), 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M., & Clarke, A. (2007). European public health research literatures—measuring progress. The European Journal of Public Health, 17(suppl 1), 2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener, G. (2011). FOI laws around the world. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutula, S., & Wamukoya, J. M. (2009). Public sector information management in east and southern Africa: Implications for FOI, democracy and integrity in government. International Journal of Information Management, 29(5), 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, L. (2006). Mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing the right to information around the world. In J. Carter (Ed.), Access to information: building a culture of transparency (pp. 49–56). Atlanta, GA: Carter Center.

  • Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2008). A framework for evaluating web sites of public authorities. Aslib Proceedings, 60(5), 517–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasquier, M., & Villeneuve, J. P. (2007). Organizational barriers to transparency: A typology and analysis of organizational behaviour tending to prevent or restrict access to information. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(1), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, K. (2004). Business and society and business ethics journals: A citation and impact analysis. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 35(2), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, S. J., Zhang, Y., Lin, W., & Yu, W. (2009). Key issues for implementation of Chinese open government information regulations. Public Administration Review, 69(s1), S129–S135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plümber, T., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Publish or perish? Publications and citations of Italian political scientists in international political science journals, 1990–2002. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1112–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relly, J. E., & Cuillier, D. (2010). A comparison of political, cultural, and economic indicators of access to information in Arab and non-Arab states. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 360–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. S. (2005). Spin control and freedom of information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada. Public Administration, 83(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & López-Hernández, A. M. (2010). Trends of e-government research: Contextualization and research opportunities. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 10(16), 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & López-Hernández, A. M. (2014). Scientometric study of the progress and development of e-government research during the period 2000–2012. Information Technology for Development. doi:10.1080/02681102.2014.927340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). A citation-based ranking of the top business ethics scholarly journals. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4(4), 390–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Cinca, C., Rueda-Tomás, M., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2009). Determinants of e-government extension. Online Information Review, 33(3), 476–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., & Flinn, A. (2010). Information governance, records management, and freedom of information: A study of local government authorities in England. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, D. (2006). The value of scientometric studies: An introduction to a debate on IS as a reference discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(5), 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y. (2014). Transparency without democracy: The unexpected effects of China’s environmental disclosure policy. Governance, 27(1), 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, D. (2013). The contribution of ISI indexing to a paper’s citations: Results of a natural experiment. European Political Science, 12(2), 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, J. P. (2014). Transparency of Transparency: The pro-active disclosure of the rules governing Access to Information as a gauge of organisational cultural transformation. The case of the Swiss transparency regime. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 556–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, L., Yan, E., & Van Eck, N. J. (2011). A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: An application to the field of library and information science. Scientometrics, 89(1), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, B. (2008). The future of freedom of information in the United Kingdom. The Political Quarterly, 79(1), 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, B. (2010). More open but not more trusted? The effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government. Governance, 23(4), 561–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economy and Company, University of Almería, Almería, Spain

    Alejandro Sáez-Martín & Carmen Caba-Perez

  2. Department of Financial Economy and Accounting, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Antonio M. López-Hernandez

  3. Department of Business Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Studies, University of Almería, C/Cañada de San Urbano S/Nk., 04120, Almería, Spain

    Carmen Caba-Perez

Authors
  1. Alejandro Sáez-Martín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio M. López-Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carmen Caba-Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Caba-Perez.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sáez-Martín, A., López-Hernandez, A.M. & Caba-Perez, C. Access to public information: a scientometric study of legal versus voluntary transparency in the public sector. Scientometrics 113, 1697–1720 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2541-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2541-5

Keywords