Evaluating students’ satisfaction: The case of Informatics Department of TEI Athens | Operational Research
Skip to main content

Evaluating students’ satisfaction: The case of Informatics Department of TEI Athens

  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The achievement of students’ satisfaction is of vital importance for every higher education institution, because it promotes its internal organization and strengthens its image in order to meet the expectations. and needs of students. This paper presents an original study that measures the students’ satisfaction in an Informatics Department in Greece. A set of powerful ordinal regression methods has been applied on a survey database. The most important results focus on the determination of the weak and strong points of the department, according to the MUSA methodology. Suggestions for the quality improvement of provided education are also included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babin, B. J. & Griffin, M. (1998).The nature of satisfaction: an updated examination and analysis. Journal o Business Research vol. 41, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden, V. M. (1995).Segmenting student markets with a student satisfaction and priorities survey. Research in Higher Education vol. 36 (1), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, B. A., Kaldenberg, D. O., Browne, W. B., & Brown, D. (1998).Students as customers: factors affecting satisfaction and assessments of institutional quality. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education vol. 8 (3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashin W.E. and Downey R.G. (1992).Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology vol. 84, 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P.A. (1981).Student rating of instruction and student Achievement. Review of Educational Research vol. 51 (3), 281–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutca, A. (1993).AMA Handbook for customer satisfaction. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. & Shin, D. (2002).Student Satisfaction: an alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management vol. 24 (2), 198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1989).The association between student rating of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Researching higher education vol. 30 (6), 583–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoroudis, E. and Siskos, Y. (2002).Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 143.

  • Guolla, M. (1999).Assessment the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice (Summer), 87–97.

  • Koilias C., Siskos Y. and Grigoroudis E. (2003).Satisfaction Measurement of Paris Metro Users. 16th National Congress EEEE, Larissa, Greece (in greek)

  • Kotier, P. and Fox, K.F. (1995).Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. (1987).Students’ evaluations of university teaching: research findings methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Psychology vol. 83, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacio, A. B., Meneses, G. D. and Perez, P. J. P. (2002).The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students. Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 40 (5), 486–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parameswaran, R., Glowacka, A.E., (1995).University image: an information processing perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education vol. 6 (2).

  • Patterson, P. G., Johnson, L. W., Spreng, R. A. (1997).Modeling the determinants of customer satisfaction for business-to-business professional services. Journal of Academy of the Marketing Science (Winter),4-17.

  • Politis Y. and Siskos Y., (2001).Multicriteria methodology for the evaluation of a Greek engineering department. EJOR 156 (2004) 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., Zahorik, A. J. and Keiningham, T.L. (1996).Service marketing. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevier, R. A. (1996).Those important things: what every college president needs to know about marketing and student recruiting. College & University (Spring),9-16.

  • Siegel S. (1988).Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Castellan Jr, N.J.

  • Siskos Y., Bouranda A. and Tsotsolas N. (2005).Measuring service quality for students in higher education, the case of a business University. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, vol. 30 (2) 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavra, T.G. (1997).Improving your measurement of customer satisfaction: A guide to creating, conducting, analyzing, and reporting customer satisfaction measurement programs. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chr Koilias.

Additional information

This work is co-funded by 75% from E.U. and 25% from the Greek Government under the framework: Operational Programme in Education and Initial Vocational Training II, Programme “Supporting the Informatics Studies in the Technological Educational Institution of Athens”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koilias, C. Evaluating students’ satisfaction: The case of Informatics Department of TEI Athens. Oper Res Int J 5, 363–381 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944319

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944319

Keywords