Reference station network based RTK systems-concepts and progress | Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences
Skip to main content

Reference station network based RTK systems-concepts and progress

  • Published:
Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences

Abstract

The limitation of single base “real-time kinematic” (RTK) techniques is the distance between base receiver and the rover receiver due to distance-dependent biases, namely orbit bias, ionosphere bias and troposphere bias. Techniques have been developed to overcome this distance dependence using a network of GPS reference stations spread over a wide geographic area. Because the measurement biases will be modelled and corrected for, the positioning accuracy will be almost independent of the inter-receiver distance. Since the mid-1990s investigators have been investigating the optimal means of processing reference receiver data, and then providing ‘correction’ information to users, in real-time. This technique is now generally referred to as Network-RTK. In 1993 the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) established a Special Study Group on “Wide Area Modelling for Precise Satellite Positioning” . This paper focusses on the progress made during the last few years in designing Network-RTK architectures and the associated data processing algorithms and issues. Although many university investigators have been researching the fundamental challenges in functional and stochastic modelling, currently there is only one commercially available Network-RTK product, the Trimble VRS. However, with the use of the Internet as the primary data communication link, it is predicted that many more implementations of Network-RTK will come ‘online’, at various sites around the world, over the next few years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blewitt G. Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution for the Global Positioning System Applied to Geodetic Baselines up to 2000 km,Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989,94(B8): 10187–10203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dong D N, Bock Y. Global Positioning System Network Analysis with Phase Ambiguity Resolution Applied to Crustal Deformation Studies in California,Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989,94(B4): 3949–3966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Han S, Rizos C. GPS Network Design and Error Mitigation for Real-time Continuous Array Monitoring Systems.9th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Kansas City, Missouri, 17–20 September, Alexandria: US ION, 1996: 1827–1836.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wübbena G, Bagge A, Seeber G,et al. Reducing Distance Dependent Errors for Real-Time Precise DGPS Applications by Establishing Reference Station Networks.9th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U.S. Institute of Navigation, Kansas City, Missouri, 17–20 September, Alexandria: US ION, 1996: 1845–1852.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Han S.Carrier Phase-Based hong-Range GPS Kinematic Positioning, Sydney: The University of New South Wales. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raquet J F, Lachapelle G, Fortes L. Use of a Covariance Analysis Technique for Predicting Performance of Regional Area Differential Code and Carrier-Phase Networks.11th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div. of the U S Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, Alexandria: US ION, 1998. 1345–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vollath U, Buecherl A, Landau H. Multi-Base RTK Positioning Using Virtual Reference Stations.13th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19–22 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2000. 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Townsend B, VanDierendonck A J, Neumann J,et al. A Proposal for Standardized Network RTK Messages.13th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19-22 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2000. 1871–1878.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Euler H J, Keenan C R, Zebhauser B E,et al. Study of a Simplified Approach in Utilizing Information from Permanent Reference Station Arrays.14th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U.S. Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 11–14 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2001. 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hu G, Khoo H S, Goh P C,et al. Testing of Singapore Integrated Multiple Reference Station Network (SIMRSN) for Precise Fast Static Positioning.European GNSS Conf GNSS2002, Copenhagen, Denmark, 27–30 May, CD-ROM proc. 2002.

  11. Jia M. Mitigation of Systematic Errors of GPS Positioning Using Vector Semiparametric Models.13th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19–22 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2000. 1938–1947.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ge L, Han S, Rizos C. Multipath Mitigation Using an Adaptive Filter.GPS Solutions, 2000,4(2): 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Santerre R, Langley RB, Ueno M,et al. Improvement of Kinematic OTF-GPS Positioning Over Long Distances: Applications to Bathymetric Surveys.Canadian Hydrographic Conference 2000, Montréal, Canada, 15–19 May (CD-Rom Proceedings). 2000.

  14. St-Pierre C, Santerre R, Parrot D. Mprovement of OTF-Kinematic GPS Positioning Over Long Distances Using Ionospheric Regional Modelling,Geomatica, Journal of the Canadian Institute of Geomatics, 1999,53(4): 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Colombo OL, Evans A G, Vigo M I,et al. Long-Baseline (>1000 km), Sub-Decimeter Kinematic Positioning of Buoys at Sea, with Potential Application to Deep-Sea Studies.13th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U.S. Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19–22 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2000. 1476–1484.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dai L, Wang J, Rizos C,et al. Predicting Atmospheric Biases for Real-Time Ambiguity Resolution in GPS/Glonass Reference Stations Networks.Journal of Geodesy, 2003,76: 617–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brunner F K, Hartinger H, Troyer L. GPS Signal Diffraction Modelling: The Stochastic SIGMA-δ Model.Journal of Geodesy, 1999,73: 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wieser A, Brunner F K. An Extended Weight Model for GPS Phase Observations,Earth, Planets & Space, 2000,52:777–782.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barnes J B, Ackroyd N, Cross P A. Stochastic Modelling for Very High Precision Real-time Kinematic GPS in an Engineering Environment.XXI Congress of the International Federation of Surveyors, 6 (ISBN 0-85406-902-X), 1998. 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  20. [20]Wang J, Satirapod C, Rizos C. Stochastic Assessment of GPS Carrier Phase Measurements for Precise Static Relative Positioning.Journal of Geodesy, 2002,76(2): 95–104.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Han S, Johnson R. Survey Quality Real-Time GPS: Solving the Time to Fix vs. Reliability Paradox,14th lnt Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 11–14 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2001. 1550–1557.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Odijk D. Weighting Ionospheric Corrections to Improve Fast GPS Positioning Over Medium Distances:13th lnt Tech. Meeting of the Satellite Div of the Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19–22 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2000. 1113–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen H Y, Rizos C, Han S. From Simulation to Implementation: Low-Cost Densification of Permanent GPS Networks in Support of Geodetic Applications.Journal of Geodesy, 2001,75(9–10): 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao Y, Li Z, McLellan J F. Carrier Phase Based Regional area Differential GPS for Decimeter-Level Positioning and Navigation,10th lnt Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Kansas City, Missouri, 16–19 September, Alexandria: US ION, 1997. 1305–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gao Y, Li Z. Ionosphere Effect and Modelling for Regional Area Differential GPS Network.11th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, 15–18 September, Alexandria: US ION, 1998. 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wanninger L. Improved Ambiguity Resolution by Regional Differential Modelling of the Ionospherez.8th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, San Diego, California, 12–15 September, Alexandria: US ION, 1995. 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wübbena G, Schmitz M, Menge F,et al. Automated Absolute Field Calibration of GPS Antennas in Real-Time.13th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19–22 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2000. 2512–2522.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fotopoulos G, Cannon M E. An Overview of Multi-reference Station Methods for Cm-Level Positioning.GPS Solutions, 2001,4(3): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Raquet J F.Development Of A Method For Kinematic GPS Carrier-Phase Ambiguity Resolution Using Multiple Reference Receivers, PhD Thesis, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marel H van der. Virtual GPS Reference Stations in The Netherlands,llth Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, 15–18 September, Alexandria: US ION, 1998. 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wanninger L. The Performance of Virtual Reference Stations in Active Geodetic GPS-Networks Under Solar Maximum Conditions.12th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, 14–17 September, Alexandria: US ION, 1999. 1419–1427.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen X, Han S, Rizos C,et al. Improving Real-Time Positioning Efficiency Using the Singapore Integrated Multiple Reference Station Network (SIMRSN), 13th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19–22 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2000. 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fotopoulos G. Parameterization of Carrier Phase Corrections Based on a Regional Network of Reference Stations,13th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U S Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19–22 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2000. 1091–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jackson M E, Meertens C, Ruud O,et al. Real-Time GPS Data Transmission Using VSAT Technology.GPS Solutions, 2002,5(4): 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Teunissen P J G, de Jonge PJ, Tiberius CCJM. A New Way to Fix Carrier-Phase Ambiguities.GPS World, 1995,6(4): 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Euler H J, Ziegler C. Advances in Ambiguity Resolution for Surveying Type Applications,13th Int Tech Meeting of the Satellite Div of the U.S. Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19–22 September, Alexandria: US ION, 2000. 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Teunissen PJG, Joosten P, Odijk D. The Reliability of GPS Ambiguity Resolution.GPS Solutions, 1999,2(3): 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Rizos.

Additional information

Biography: C. Rizos (1954-), male, Professor, Ph.D, research direction: precise static and kinematic applications of GPS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rizos, C., Han, S. Reference station network based RTK systems-concepts and progress. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 8, 566–574 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02899820

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02899820

Key words

CLC Number