Tracking changes in research priorities in physics: A macro level analysis | Scientometrics Skip to main content
Log in

Tracking changes in research priorities in physics: A macro level analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to monitor the changes in research priorities in Physics by analyzing the research profile of thirty three countries in major fields of Physics as classified under PACS (Physics and Astronomy Classification scheme). Data is taken from INSPEC (CD-ROM) version under two different time periods—1990 & 1995. Priority Index (PI) is used to understand the priorities of countries in major fields and shifts in their priorities during these two time periods. Correspondence analysis is applied to the matrices of research priorities to understand the multivariate relationships between countries and fields and reveal the dynamics of changes taking place in two time periods. The results and its implications for policy studies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. S. Nagpaul, Lalita Sharma, Science in the eighties: A typology of countries based on inter-field priorities.Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, T. Braun, E. Rinia, M. Brocken,Physics in the European Union in the 80's. A Scientometric Study, FOM-94, Utrecht, 1994.

  3. R. Todorov, Distribution of physics literature,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sujit Bhattacharya, World structure of physics: A cross national comparison,JISSI (International Journal of Scientometrics and Informetrics), 2 (1996) 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. D. Frame, Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean,Interciencia, 2 (1997) 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relational indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact,Scientometrics, 14 (1986) 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Barre, A strategic assessment of the scientific performance of five countries,Science and Technology Studies, 5 (1987) 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Lebart, A. Morineau, K. M. Warwick,Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis: Correspondence Analysis and Related Techniques for Large Matrice, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Greenacre,Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, Academic Press, London, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. S. Nagpaul,Ref. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P. S. Nagpaul, Lalita Sharma, Sujit Bhattacharya, Transnational Linkages of Indian Science-Interim Report, Rep-180/96, NISTADS, 1996.

  12. A. L. Porter, M. J. Detampel, Technology opportunities analysis,Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 49 (1995) 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. F. J. Van Raan, A. J. Nederhof, H. F. Moed, Science and technology indicators: Their use in Science policy and their role in science studies (Select proceedings of the first international workshop on Science and Technology indicators, Leiden, 1988) DSWO press, Leiden, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. H. Van-De-Van, D. L. Feary,Managing and Assessing Organisations, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhattacharya, S., Singh, S.P. & Sudhakar, P. Tracking changes in research priorities in physics: A macro level analysis. Scientometrics 40, 57–82 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459262

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459262

Keywords

Navigation