Abstract
This paper attempts to monitor the changes in research priorities in Physics by analyzing the research profile of thirty three countries in major fields of Physics as classified under PACS (Physics and Astronomy Classification scheme). Data is taken from INSPEC (CD-ROM) version under two different time periods—1990 & 1995. Priority Index (PI) is used to understand the priorities of countries in major fields and shifts in their priorities during these two time periods. Correspondence analysis is applied to the matrices of research priorities to understand the multivariate relationships between countries and fields and reveal the dynamics of changes taking place in two time periods. The results and its implications for policy studies are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. S. Nagpaul, Lalita Sharma, Science in the eighties: A typology of countries based on inter-field priorities.Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 263–283.
W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, T. Braun, E. Rinia, M. Brocken,Physics in the European Union in the 80's. A Scientometric Study, FOM-94, Utrecht, 1994.
R. Todorov, Distribution of physics literature,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 195–209.
Sujit Bhattacharya, World structure of physics: A cross national comparison,JISSI (International Journal of Scientometrics and Informetrics), 2 (1996) 21–32.
J. D. Frame, Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean,Interciencia, 2 (1997) 143–148.
A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relational indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact,Scientometrics, 14 (1986) 281–291.
R. Barre, A strategic assessment of the scientific performance of five countries,Science and Technology Studies, 5 (1987) 32–38.
L. Lebart, A. Morineau, K. M. Warwick,Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis: Correspondence Analysis and Related Techniques for Large Matrice, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984.
M. J. Greenacre,Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, Academic Press, London, 1984.
P. S. Nagpaul,Ref. 1.
P. S. Nagpaul, Lalita Sharma, Sujit Bhattacharya, Transnational Linkages of Indian Science-Interim Report, Rep-180/96, NISTADS, 1996.
A. L. Porter, M. J. Detampel, Technology opportunities analysis,Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 49 (1995) 237–255.
A. F. J. Van Raan, A. J. Nederhof, H. F. Moed, Science and technology indicators: Their use in Science policy and their role in science studies (Select proceedings of the first international workshop on Science and Technology indicators, Leiden, 1988) DSWO press, Leiden, 1989.
A. H. Van-De-Van, D. L. Feary,Managing and Assessing Organisations, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1984.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhattacharya, S., Singh, S.P. & Sudhakar, P. Tracking changes in research priorities in physics: A macro level analysis. Scientometrics 40, 57–82 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459262
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459262