Abstract
The starting point of many feminist studies on information technology is the question of how to create equal access to the computer and computer science for women. This question has raised further more profound questions concerning the computer and its effects on the relationship between the sexes.
In my contribution, I will firstly look at those symbolic constructions whichgenderise this technology itself and the ways of handling it. Secondly, I will look into how information technology influences the area of private reproduction and the public division of labour between the sexes. With the advent of information technology, new tendencies, their outcome still undecided, can be seen in both areas. These tendencies could lead to a stabilisation of the current relationship between the sexes. The (inherent) contradictions could however, be used by the women's movement to promote changes which further emancipate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Lowe Benston, M. (1992). Women's Voices/Men's Voices: Technology as Language. In: Kirkup, G. and Smith Keller, L. (Eds.) Inventing Women.Science, Technology and Gender. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Andersen, P. B. (1990).A Theory of Computer Semiotics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cockburn, C. (1990).Machinery of Dominance. Women, Man and Technical Know-how. Pluto Press.
Cooley, M. (1980).Architect or Bee? Langley Technical Services Hand and Brain, Slough.
Edwards, P. N. (1990). The Army and the Microworld.Signs, Autumn, pp. 102–127.
Flusser, V. (1990).Ins Universum der Technischen Bilder. Gottingen.
Fraser, N. (1989). What's Critical About Critical Theory? The Case of Habermas and Gender. In: Fraser (Ed.)Unruly Practices. Minneapolis.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.Social Text,25/26, pp. 56–80.
Habermas, J. (1988).Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.
Harding, S. (1986).The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell University Press. Ithaca and London.
Keller, E. F. (1985).Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press. New Haven, London.
Kirkrup, G. (1992). The Social Construction of Computers: Hammers or Harpsichords? In: Kirkrup, G. and L. Smith Keller (Eds.)Inventing Women. Science, Technology and Gender. Cambridge Polity Press, pp. 267–281.
Mackinnon, A.G. (1991). Autonomy and Control: Women, Work and Computerization. In: Eriksson I.V. et al.:Women, Work and Computerization. Proc. of the IFIP Conference. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 113–123.
Orland, B. and Schlag, R. (1989).Tendezen der Elektronisierung der privaten Haushalte. Frankfurt a.M.
Postman, N. (1985).Amusing Ourselves to Death. Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Viking-Penguin.
Ravetz, A. (1985). Modern Technology and an Ancient Occupation: Houseworking Present-Day Society.Technology and Culture 6, pp. 256–260.
Theweleit, K. (1980).Männerphantasien, Reinbek Rowohlt.
Turkle, S. (1984).The Second Self. Computers and the Human Spirit. Simon and Schuster. New York.
Turkle, S. and Papert, S. (1990). Epistomological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture.Signs, Autumn, pp. 128–157.
Smith, J. and Balka, E. (1988). Chatting On a Feminist Computer Network. In: Kramarae, C. (Ed.)Technology and Women's Voices. Routledge and Kegan. Paul New York, pp. 82–97.
Varela, F. (1988). Cognitive Science.A Cartography of Current Ideas.
Wajcman, J. (1991)Feminism Confronts Technology. Polity Press Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schelhowe, H. Gender symbolism and changes in lifeworld through information technology. AI & Soc 7, 358–367 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891417
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891417