Book reviews | Minds and Machines Skip to main content
Log in

Book reviews

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. DennettDaniel (1983), ‘Intentional Systems in Cognitive Ethology: The “Panglossian Paradigm” Defended’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6: 343–390.

    Google Scholar 

  2. GardnerHoward (1985), The Mind's New Science, New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson-LairdPhilip N. (1988), The Computer and the Mind: An Introduction to Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. HofstadterDouglas H. (1982), ‘Artificial Intelligence: Subcognition as Computation,’ in F.Machulp and U.Mansfield, eds., The Study of Information, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  2. FrenchRobert M. (1990), ‘Subcognition and the Limits of the Turing Test,’ Mind 99, pp. 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. BarwiseJon and PerryJohn (1983), Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DretskeFred (1981), Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. NilssonNils J. (1980), Principles of Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto CA: Tioga Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  2. RichElaine (1983), Artificial Intelligence, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  3. SacerdotiEarl D. (1977), A Structure for Plans and Behavior, New York: Elsevier North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ShapiroStuart C. (1992), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, 2nd edition, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. GoldsteinRobert Justin (1992), ‘The Limitations of Using Quantitative Data in Studying Human Rights Abuses’, in Thomas B.Jabine and Richard P.Claude, eds., Human Rights and Statistics: Getting the Record Straight, Pittsburgh: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ResnickMitchel (1991), ‘Animal Simulations with *Logo: Massive Parallelism for the Masses’, in Jean-ArcadyMeyer and Stewart W.Wilson, eds., From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ResnickMitchel (1995), StarLogo Reference Manual, Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Lab.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. BodenMargaret (1991), The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  2. JosephsonJohn, and JosephsonSusan, eds. (1994), Abductive Inference, Computation, Philosophy, Technology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schagrin, Morton L. (1995), Review of Josephson and Josephson's Abductive Inference, Computation, Philosophy, Technology, in Minds and Machines 5, pp. 448–450.

  4. Shanker, Stuart (1993), Review of Margaret Boden's The Creative Mind, in Minds and Machines 3, pp. 109–113.

  5. SimonHerbert (1969/1982), The Sciences of the Artificial, Second Edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. AntonelliGian Aldo (1994a), ‘The Complexity of Revision’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35, pp. 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. AntonelliGian Aldo (1994b), ‘Non-Well-Founded Sets via Revision Rules’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23, pp. 633–679.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BelnapNuel D. (1982), ‘Gupta's Rule of Revision Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, pp. 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. FineKit (1975), ‘Vagueness, Truth, and Logic’, Synthese 30, pp. 265–300.

    Google Scholar 

  5. GaifmanHaim (1992), ‘Pointers to Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 89, pp. 223–261.

    Google Scholar 

  6. GuptaAnil (1982), ‘Truth and Paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, pp. 1–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. GuptaAnil (1988/1989), ‘Remarks on Definitions and the Concept of Truth’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89, pp. 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  8. HerzbergerHans G. (1982), ‘Notes on Naive Semantics’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, pp. 61–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. KremerPhilip (1993), ‘The Gupta-Belnap Systems S #and S *Not Axiomatisable’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34, pp. 583–596.

    Google Scholar 

  10. KripkeSaul (1975), ‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 72, pp. 690–716.

    Google Scholar 

  11. MartinRobert L., and WoodruffPeter R. (1975), ‘On Representing “True-in-L” in L'’, Philosophia 5, pp. 217–221.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McGeeVann (1985), ‘How Truth-Like Can a Predicate Be? A Negative Result’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 14, pp. 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  13. YabloSteve (1985), ‘Truth and Reflection’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 14, pp. 297–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. YaqūbAladdin M. (1993), The Liar Speaks the Truth, Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leiber, J., French, R.M., Barnden, J.A. et al. Book reviews. Minds and Machines 6, 89–129 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388919

Navigation