Abstract
Rejecting traditional checklist approaches to software selection, this paper discusses an approach emphasising classroom use of software over technical attributes. It proposes a way of thinking about software (the perspectives interactions paradigm) that takes the perspectives of the student, the teacher and the designer and uses interactions between pairs of these perspectives to generate broad questions and more specific issues to be considered when software is being assessed for purchase or classroom use. Some example packages are assessed using the paradigm for several different educational contexts, illustrating that this approach raises issues of classroom interactions and learning processes. These issues go beyond, and are more important for selection decisions than those generally considered with a checklist of software attributes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
BleaseD. (1986). Evaluating Educational Software. London: Croom Helm.
KemmisS., AtkinR. and WrightE. (1977). How do students learn? Working Papers on CAL., Occasional Paper No. 5, Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia, UK.
MayerM. (1992). Just Grandma and Me. Novato, CA: Broderbund.
McDougallA. and SquiresD. (1995a). A critical examination of the checklist approach in software selection. Journal of Educational Computing Research 12(3), 263–74.
McDougallA. and SquiresD. (1995b). An empirical study of a new paradigm for choosing educational software. Computers and Education 25(3), 93–103.
MicroSIFT (1982). Evaluator's Guide for Microcomputer-Based Instructional Packages. Eugene, OR: The International Council for Computers in Education.
Microsoft Corporation (1994). Microsoft Encarta Multimedia Encyclopaedia.
NCET (1992). CD-ROM in Schools Scheme Evaluation Report. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
Office of Technology Assessment (1988). Power On! New Tools for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
SalvasA. and ThomasG. (1984). Evaluation of Software, Melbourne: Education Department of Victoria.
SelfJ. (1985). Microcomputers in Education: A Critical Appraisal of Educational Software. Brighton: Harvester Press.
SmolanR. (1992). From Alice to Ocean. Ringwood: Penguin Australia.
SquiresD. and McDougallA. (1994). Choosing and Using Educational Software. London: Falmer Press.
TaylorR. (1980). The Computer in the School: Tutor, Tool, Tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDougall, A., Squires, D. & Guss, S. Emphasising use over attributes in selection of educational software. Educ Inf Technol 1, 151–164 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168279
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168279