Abstract
Spoken language is the most natural way for a human to communicate with a robot. It may seem intuitive that a robot should communicate with users in their native language. However, it is not clear if a user’s perception of a robot is affected by the language of interaction. We investigated this question by conducting a study with twenty-three native Czech participants who were also fluent in English. The participants were tasked with instructing the Pepper robot on where to place objects on a shelf. The robot was controlled remotely using the Wizard-of-Oz technique. We collected data through questionnaires, video recordings, and a post-experiment feedback session. The results of our experiment show that people perceive an English-speaking robot as more intelligent than a Czech-speaking robot (z = 18.00, p-value = 0.02). This finding highlights the influence of language on human-robot interaction. Furthermore, we discuss the feedback obtained from the participants via the post-experiment sessions and its implications for HRI design.
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Priority Research Area DigiWorld PSP: U1U/P06/NO/02.19 under the Strategic Programme Excellence Initiative at the Jagiellonian University, and by the National Science Centre, Poland, under the OPUS call in the Weave programme under the project number K/NCN/000142.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003, pp. 55–60. IEEE (2003)
Andrist, S., Ziadee, M., Boukaram, H., Mutlu, B., Sakr, M.: Effects of culture on the credibility of robot speech: a comparison between English and Arabic. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 157–164 (2015)
Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J.W., Kim, E.S., Scassellati, B.: The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 41–52 (2011)
Bartneck, C.: Godspeed questionnaire series: translations and usage (2023)
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 71–81 (2009)
Beato, M., Albuquerque, P.B., Cadavid, S., Suarez, M.: The effect of memory instructions on within- and between-language false memory. Appl. Psycholinguist. 44, 1–25 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716423000140
Breazeal, C.: Emotive qualities in robot speech. In: Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No. 01CH37180), vol. 3, pp. 1388–1394. IEEE (2001)
Fischer, K., Niebuhr, O., Jensen, L.C., Bodenhagen, L.: Speech melody matters-how robots profit from using charismatic speech. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. (THRI) 9(1), 1–21 (2019)
Gombolay, M.C., Shah, A.: Appraisal of statistical practices in HRI vis-a-vis the t-test for Likert items/scales. In: AAAI Fall Symposia (2016)
Gong, L.: The boundary of racial prejudice: comparing preferences for computer-synthesized white, black, and robot characters. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(5), 2074–2093 (2008)
Hall, J., Tritton, T., Rowe, A., Pipe, A., Melhuish, C., Leonards, U.: Perception of own and robot engagement in human-robot interactions and their dependence on robotics knowledge. Robot. Auton. Syst. 62(3), 392–399 (2014)
Henderson, J.K., Louhiala-Salminen, L.: Does language affect trust in global professional contexts? Perceptions of international business professionals. J. Rhetoric Prof. Commun. Global. 2(1), 2 (2011)
Horwitz, E.: Language anxiety and achievement. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 21, 112–126 (2001)
Kim, J., et al.: Control strategies for cleaning robots in domestic applications: a comprehensive review. Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 16(4), 1729881419857432 (2019)
Marge, M., et al.: Spoken language interaction with robots: recommendations for future research. Comput. Speech Lang. 71, 101255 (2022)
Nam, C.S., Lyons, J.B.: Trust in Human-Robot Interaction. Academic Press, Cambridge (2020)
Piazza, C., Grioli, G., Catalano, M., Bicchi, A.: A century of robotic hands. Annu. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 2, 1–32 (2019)
Polishuk, A., Verner, I.: An elementary science class with a robot teacher. In: Lepuschitz, W., Merdan, M., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds.) RiE 2017. AISC, vol. 630, pp. 263–273. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62875-2_24
Riek, L.D.: Wizard of OZ studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 1(1), 119–136 (2012)
Salem, M., Ziadee, M., Sakr, M.: Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of politeness and culture on robot acceptance and anthropomorphization. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 74–81 (2014)
Sheridan, T.B.: Human-robot interaction: status and challenges. Hum. Factors 58(4), 525–532 (2016)
Sienkiewicz, B., Sejnova, G., Gajewski, P., Vavrecka, M., Indurkhya, B.: Native Czech speakers consider English-speaking robots more intelligent. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (2023)
Snow, C.E.: Rationales for native language instruction. Bilingual Education: Issues and Strategies, pp. 60–74 (1990)
Sone, Y.: Japanese Robot Culture. Springer, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52527-7
Song, S., Yamada, S.: Expressing emotions through color, sound, and vibration with an appearance-constrained social robot. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 2–11 (2017)
Steinhaeusser, S.C., Lein, M., Donnermann, M., Lugrin, B.: Designing social robots’ speech in the hotel context-a series of online studies. In: 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 163–170. IEEE (2022)
Takahashi, T., Tanaka, K., Kobayashi, K., Oka, N.: Melodic emotional expression increases ease of talking to spoken dialog agents. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pp. 84–92 (2021)
Tan, H., et al.: Relationship between social robot proactive behavior and the human perception of anthropomorphic attributes. Adv. Robot. 34(20), 1324–1336 (2020)
Thomaz, A.L., Breazeal, C.: Teachable robots: understanding human teaching behavior to build more effective robot learners. Artif. Intell. 172(6–7), 716–737 (2008)
Thomaz, A.L., Hoffman, G., Breazeal, C.: Reinforcement learning with human teachers: understanding how people want to teach robots. In: ROMAN 2006-The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 352–357. IEEE (2006)
Ting-Toomey, S., Dorjee, T.: Communicating Across Cultures. Guilford Publications, New York (2018)
Torre, I., White, L.: Trust in vocal human-robot interaction: implications for robot voice design. In: Voice Attractiveness: Studies on Sexy, Likable, and Charismatic Speakers, pp. 299–316 (2021)
Trovato, G., et al.: Cross-cultural study on human-robot greeting interaction: acceptance and discomfort by Egyptians and Japanese. Paladyn, J. Behav. Robot. 4(2), 83–93 (2013)
Weiss, A., Bartneck, C.: Meta analysis of the usage of the godspeed questionnaire series. In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 381–388. IEEE (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sienkiewicz, B., Sejnova, G., Gajewski, P., Vavrecka, M., Indurkhya, B. (2024). How Language of Interaction Affects the User Perception of a Robot. In: Ali, A.A., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14453 . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8715-3_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8715-3_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8714-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8715-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)