Decision-Making Styles in an Evolutionary Perspective | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Decision-Making Styles in an Evolutionary Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neural Approaches to Dynamics of Signal Exchanges

Abstract

Naturalistic decision-making (NDM) investigates the cognitive strategies used by experts in making decisions in real-world contexts. Unlike studies conducted in the laboratory, the NDM paradigm is applied to real human interactions, often characterized by uncertainty, risk, complexity, time pressures and so on. In this approach, the role of experience is crucial in making possible a quick classification of decision-making situations and therefore in making an effective, rapid and prudent choice. Models of behaviour resulting from these studies represent an extraordinary resource for research and for the application of decision-making strategies in high-risk environments. They particularly underline not only that most of the critical decisions that we take are based on our intuition, but that the ability to recognize patterns and other signals that allow us to act effectively is a natural extension of experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zsambok, C.E., Klein, G. (eds.): Naturalistic Decision Making. Psychology Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klein, G.A., Orasanu, J.E., Calderwood, R.E., Zsambok, C.E.: Decision making in action: models and methods. In: This Book is an Outcome of a Workshop Held in Dayton, OH, 25–27 Sep 1989. Ablex Publishing, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klein, G.L.: A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Ablex Publishing, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beach, L.R., Lipshitz, R.: Why classical decision theory is an inappropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In: Decision Making in Aviation, 85 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lipshitz, R.: Converging themes in the study of decision making in realistic settings. In: Klein, G.A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., Zsambok, C.E. (eds.) Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, pp. 103–137. Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammond, K.R., Hamm, R.M., Grassia, J., Pearson, T.: Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 17(5), 753–770 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasmussen, J.: Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3, 257–266 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maldonato, N.M., Dell’Orco, S.: The natural logic of action. World Futures 69(3), 174–183 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morton, A.: Disasters and Dilemmas: Strategies for Real-Life Decision Making. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klein, G.A., Calderwood, R., Clinton-Cirocco, A.: Rapid decision making on the fire ground. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting (vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 576–580). Sage, Los Angeles, CA (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipshitz, R., Omodei, M., McLennan, J., Wearing, A.: What’s burning? The RAWFS heuristic on the fire ground. In: Expertise Out of Context, pp. 97–112 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zsambok, C.E.: Implications of a recognitional decision model for consumer behavior. In: ACR North American Advances (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schiebener, J., Brand, M.: Decision making under objective risk conditions—a review of cognitive and emotional correlates, strategies, feedback processing, and external influences. Neuropsychol. Rev. 25(2), 171–198 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maldonato, N.M., Dell’Orco, S., Sperandeo, R.: When intuitive decisions making, based on expertise, may deliver better results than a rational, deliberate approach. In: Esposito, A., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Morabito, F.C., Pasero, E. (eds.) Multidisciplinary Approaches to Neural Computing. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simon, H.A.: Theories of bounded rationality. Decis. Organ. 1(1), 161–176 (1972)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Klein, G.: A naturalistic decision making perspective on studying intuitive decision making. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 4(3), 164–168 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Juanchich, M., Dewberry, C., Sirota, M., Narendran, S.: Cognitive reflection predicts real-life decision outcomes, but not over and above personality and decision-making styles. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 29(1), 52–59 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mata, R., Josef, A.K., Lemaire, P.: Adaptive decision making and aging. In: Aging and Decision Making, pp. 105–126 (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin, X., Featherman, M., Brooks, S.L., Hajli, N.: Exploring gender differences in online consumer purchase decision making: an online product presentation perspective. In: Information Systems Frontiers, pp. 1–15 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F.: Individual differences in rational thought. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127(2), 161 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scott, S.G., Bruce, R.A.: Decision-making style: the development and assessment of a new measure. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 55(5), 818–831 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Riding, R.J., Glass, A., Douglas, G.: Individual differences in thinking: cognitive and neurophysiological perspectives. Educ. Psychol. 13(3–4), 267–279 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pask, G.: Learning strategies, teaching strategies, and conceptual or learning style. Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, pp. 83–100. Springer, Boston, MA (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., Heier, H.: Individual differences in intuitive—experiential and analytical—rational thinking styles. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71(2), 390 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maldonato, N.M., Dell’Orco, S.: The predictive brain. World Futures 68(6), 381–389 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A.M., Fischhoff, B.: Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92(5), 938 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Scheibehenne, B., Von Helversen, B.: Selecting decision strategies: the differential role of affect. Cogn. Emot. 29(1), 158–167 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hollnagel, E.: Decisions about “what” and decisions about “how”. In: Decision Making in Complex Environments, pp. 37–46. CRC Press, Boca Rotan (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J.: The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Maldonato, N.M., Dell’Orco, S.: How to make decisions in an uncertain world: heuristics, biases, and risk perception. World Futures 67(8), 569–577 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gigerenzer, G.: Towards a rational theory of heuristics. Minds, Models and Milieux, pp. 34–59. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B.E., Jekel, M.: What is adaptive about adaptive decision making? A parallel constraint satisfaction account. Cognition 133(3), 641–666 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Laureiro-Martínez, D., Brusoni, S.: Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision-making: evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision-makers. Strateg. Manag. J. 39, 1031–1058 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jekel, M., Glöckner, A.: How to identify strategy use and adaptive strategy selection: the crucial role of chance correction in weighted compensatory strategies. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 31, 265–279 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shevchenko, Y., Bröder, A.: The effect of mood on integration of information in a multi-attribute decision task. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 185, 136–145 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maldonato, N.M.: Undecidable decisions: rationality limits and decision-making heuristics. World Futures 63(1), 28–37 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hogarth, R.M., Reder, M.W.: Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zipf, G.K.: Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least-Effort. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Cambridge MA (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gigerenzer, G.: The adaptive toolbox: toward a Darwinian rationality. Nebr. Symp. Motiv. 47, 113–144 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mousavi, S.: Ecological rationality of heuristics in psychology and economics. In: Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics, 88 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lipshitz, R., Strauss, O.: Coping with uncertainty: a naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 69(2), 149–163 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Maldonato, N.M., Dell’Orco, S.: Making decisions under uncertainty emotions, risk and biases. Advances in Neural Networks: Computational and Theoretical Issues, pp. 293–302. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Gore, J., Ward, P.: Naturalistic decision making under uncertainty: theoretical and methodological developments–an introduction to the special section. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Klein, G.: The power of Intuition. Currency-Doubleday, New York, NY (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sperandeo, R., Picciocchi, E., Valenzano, A., Cibelli, G., Ruberto, V., Moretto, E., Monda, V., Messina, A., Dell’Orco, S., Di Sarno, A.D., Marsala, G., Polito, A.N., Longobardi, T., Maldonato, N.M.: Exploring the relationships between executive functions and personality dimensions in the light of “embodied cognition” theory: a study on a sample of 130 subjects. Acta Medica Mediterranea 34(5), 1271–1279 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sperandeo, R., Moretto, E., Baldo, G., Dell’Orco, S., Maldonato, N.M.: Executive functions and personality features: a circular interpretative paradigm. In: 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp. 000063–000066. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Dell’Orco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dell’Orco, S. et al. (2020). Decision-Making Styles in an Evolutionary Perspective. In: Esposito, A., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Morabito, F., Pasero, E. (eds) Neural Approaches to Dynamics of Signal Exchanges. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 151. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics