Benefits of Accurate Imputations in GWAS | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Benefits of Accurate Imputations in GWAS

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Evolutionary Computation (EvoApplications 2014)

Abstract

Imputation methods have been suggested as an efficient way to increase both utility and coverage in genome-wide association studies, especially when combining data generated from different genotyping arrays. We aim to demonstrate that imputation results are extremely accurate and the association analysis from imputed data does not over-inflate the results. Instead imputation leads to an increase in the power of the dataset without introducing any systematic biases. The majority of common variants can be imputed with very high accuracy (r2>0.9) and we validated the accuracy of imputations by comparing actual genotypes from low-throughput genotyping assays against imputed genotypes. Imputation was performed using IMPUTE2 and the 1000 Genomes cosmopolitan reference panel, which results in about 38 million SNPs. After quality control and filtering we performed case-control associations with 3,159,556 markers. We show a comparison of results from genotyped and imputed data and also determine how accurate ancestry is determined by imputations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hindorff, L.A., Sethupathy, P., Junkins, H.A., Ramos, E.M., Mehta, J.P., Collins, F.S., Manolio, T.A.: Potential Etiologic and Functional Implications of Genome-wide Association Loci for Human Diseases and Traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 9362–9367

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dudbridge, F., Gusnanto, A.: Estimation of Significance Thresholds for Genomewide Association Scans. Genetic Epidemiology 32, 227–234

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chanock, S.J., Manolio, T., Boehnke, M., Boerwinkle, E., Hunter, D.J., Thomas, G., Hirschhorn, J.N., et al.: Replicating Genotype-phenotype Associations. Nature 447, 655–660

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stranger, B.E., Stahl, E.A., Raj, T.: Progress and Promise of Genome-Wide Association Studies for Human Complex Trait Genetics. Genetics 187, 367–383

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evangelou, E., John P.A.: Ioannidis: Meta-analysis Methods for Genome-wide Association Studies and Beyond. Nature Reviews Genetics 14, 379–389

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCarty, C.A., Wilke, R.A., Giampietro P.F., Wesbrook S.D., Caldwell, M.D.: Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP): design, methods and recruitment for a large population-based biobank. Personalized Medicine 2, 49–79

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turner, S., Armstrong, L.L., Bradford, Y., Carlson, C.S., Crawford, D.C., Crenshaw, A.T., de Andrade, M., et al.: Quality Control Procedures for Genome-wide Association Studies. Current Protocols in Human 68, 1.19.1–1.19.18

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cross, D.S., Ivacic, L.C., McCarty, C.A.: Development of a Fingerprinting Panel Using Medically Relevant Polymorphisms. BMC Medical Genomics 2, 17

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cross, D.S., Ivacic, L.C., Stefanski, E.L., McCarty, C.A.: Population Based Allele Frequencies of Disease Associated Polymorphisms in the Personalized Medicine Research Project. BMC Genetics 11, 51

    Google Scholar 

  10. Olivier, D., Marchini, J., Zagury, J.-F.: A Linear Complexity Phasing Method for Thousands of Genomes. Nature Methods 9, 179–181

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marchini, J., Howie, B., Myers, S., McVean, G., Donnelly, P.: A New Multipoint Method for Genome-wide Association Studies by Imputation of Genotypes. Nature Genetics 39, 906–913

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frazer, K.A., Ballinger, D.G., Cox, D.R., Hinds, D.A., Stuve, L.L., Gibbs, R.A., Belmont, J.W., et al.: A Second Generation Human Haplotype Map of over 3.1 Million SNPs. Nature 449, 851–861

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howie, B., Fuchsberger, C., Stephens, M., Marchini, J., Abecasis, G.R.: Fast and Accurate Genotype Imputation in Genome-wide Association Studies through Pre-phasing. Nature Genetics 44, 955–959

    Google Scholar 

  14. Altshuler, D.M., Gibbs, R.A., Peltonen, L., Altshuler, D.M., Gibbs, R.A., Peltonen, L., Dermitzakis, E., et al.: Integrating Common and Rare Genetic Variation in Diverse Human Populations. Nature 467, 52–58

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kho, A.N., Hayes, M.G., Rasmussen-Torvik, L., Pacheco, J.A., Thompson, W.K., Armstrong, L.L., Denny, J.C., et al.: Use of Diverse Electronic Medical Record Systems to Identify Genetic Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Within a Genome-wide Association Study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 19, 212–218

    Google Scholar 

  16. Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Manuel, A.R.F., Bender, D., Maller, J., et al.: PLINK: a Tool Set for Whole-genome Association and Population-based Linkage Analyses. American Journal of Human Genetics 81, 559–575

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng, X., Levine, D., Shen, J., Gogarten, S.M., Laurie, C., Weir, B.S.: A High- performance Computing Toolset for Relatedness and Principal Component Analysis of SNP Data. Bioinformatics 28, 3326–3328

    Google Scholar 

  18. Novembre, J., Stephens, M.: Interpreting principal component analyses of spatial population genetic variation. Nat. Genetics 40, 646–649

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pruim, R.J., Welch, R.P., Sanna, S., Teslovich, T.M., Chines, P.S., Gliedt, T.P., Boehnke, M., Abecasis, G.R., Willer, C.J.: LocusZoom: Regional Visualization of Genome-wide Association Scan Results. Bioinformatics 26, 2336–2337

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pendergrass, S.A., Dudek, S.M., Crawford, D.C., Ritchie, M.D.: Visually Integrating and Exploring High Throughput Phenome-Wide Association Study (PheWAS) Results Using PheWAS-View. BioData Mining 5, 5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Murray Brilliant or Marylyn D. Ritchie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Verma, S.S. et al. (2014). Benefits of Accurate Imputations in GWAS. In: Esparcia-Alcázar, A., Mora, A. (eds) Applications of Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8602. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45523-4_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45523-4_71

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45522-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45523-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics