Semantically Assisted XBRL-Taxonomy Alignment Across Languages | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Semantically Assisted XBRL-Taxonomy Alignment Across Languages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards the Multilingual Semantic Web
  • 817 Accesses

Abstract

The eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) has standardized the generation of and the access to financial statements like balance sheets, but language and XBRL-taxonomy diversity makes financial data integration across national borders and jurisdictions problematic. Integrating financial data in these circumstances requires that different multilingual jurisdictional taxonomies be aligned by finding correspondences between concepts. In this chapter, we outline a logic-based approach to this important alignment problem. The approach centers around the construction of an Accounting Ontology which, acting as a common denominator, is first used to enrich the semantics of ontologized XBRL taxonomies before reasoning is applied for alignment. Initial alignment experiments conducted on the French and Spanish balance sheets yielded 73.9 % recall and 36.6 % precision, but 100 % precision, if redundant mappings are ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://www.sec.gov/.

  2. 2.

    See http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/.

  3. 3.

    See http://www.eba.europa.eu/Supervisory-Reporting/FINER.aspx.

  4. 4.

    See http://www.ebr.org/.

  5. 5.

    See http://www.xbrl.org/knowledge_centre/projects/list.

  6. 6.

    See http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_reboot?currentPage=all.

  7. 7.

    See http://www.xbrl.org/comparability-task-force.

  8. 8.

    See http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.

  9. 9.

    See http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/2012/.

  10. 10.

    See http://fadyart.com/en/.

  11. 11.

    See http://xbrl.squarespace.com/financial-report-ontology/.

  12. 12.

    See http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-specified-values/.

  13. 13.

    See http://www.monnet-project.eu/.

  14. 14.

    See http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.

  15. 15.

    See http://www.co-ode.org/resources/reference/manchester_syntax/.

  16. 16.

    See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/.

  17. 17.

    See http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/.

  18. 18.

    The YAM++ of year 2012 does not require training.

  19. 19.

    See http://www.xbrleurope.org/working-groups/xebr-wg.

References

  • Aleksovski, Z., ten Kate, W., & van Harmelen, F. (2006). Exploiting the structure of background knowledge used in ontology matching. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM’06).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. (2012). Case study: Taxonomy packages - A simple specification to solve a universal problem. Interactive Business Reporting, 2, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, J., Rong, G., Li, X., & Ding, L. (2010). Representing financial reports on the semantic web: A faithful translation from XBRL to OWL. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Rules (RuleML’10) (pp. 144–152).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C.-C., & Chi, Y.-L. (2010). Developing ontology-based epa for representing accounting principles in a reusable knowledge component. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 2316–2323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Declerck, T., & Krieger, H.-U. (2006). Translating XBRL into description logic. an approach using protege, sesame & OWL. In Proceedings of International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS’06) (pp. 455–467).

    Google Scholar 

  • Declerck, T., Krieger, H.-U., Thomas, S. M., Buitelaar, P., O’Riain, S., Wunner, T., et al. (2010). Ontology-based multilingual access to financial reports for sharing business knowledge across europe. In J. Roóz & J. Ivanyos (Eds.), Internal Financial Control Assessment Applying Multilingual Ontology Framework. Kiadja a Memolux Kft., Készült a HVG Press Kft. nyomdájában.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, D. S. (2009, June). XBRL and semantic interoperability. Model Driven Architecture Journal, 3 (5 pp.). http://www.bptrends.com/bpt/wp-content/publicationfiles/SIX%2006-09-COL-MDA%20Journal%202009-06%20XBRL%20v01-00-%20Frankel.pdf.

  • Gailly, F., & Poels, G. (2007). Towards ontology-driven information systems: Redesign and formalization of the REA ontology. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS’07) (pp. 245–259).

    Google Scholar 

  • García, R., & Gil, R. (2009). Publishing XBRL as linked open data. In Proceedings of World Wide Web Workshop: Linked Data on the Web (LDOW’09) (Vol. 538).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, M. R., & Fisher, I. E. (2008). Appearance of new terms in accounting language: A preliminary examination of accounting pronouncements and financial statements. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 5, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, M. C., & Gerber, A. J. (2011). Towards the development of consistent and unambiguous financial accounting standards using ontology technologies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Accounting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, C., & Watson, L. (2009). XBRL for dummies. Hoboken: Wiley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean-Mary, Y. R., Shironoshita, E. P., & Kabuka, M. R. (2009). Ontology matching with semantic verification. Journal of Web Semantic, 7(3), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Cuenca Grau, B., Zhou, Y., & Horrocks, I. (2012). Large-scale interactive ontology matching: Algorithms and implementation. In Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’12) (pp. 444–449).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahel, J. P. (2012). On the Formalization of Accounting Standards (Ph.D. thesis, State University of New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., & Min, L. (2009). An ontology-augmented xbrl extended model for financial information analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems (ICIS’09) (pp. 99–130).

    Google Scholar 

  • Motik, B., Shearer, R., & Horrocks, I. (2007). Optimized reasoning in description logics using hypertableaux. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE’21). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 67–83).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, M., Vargas-vera, M., & Motta, E. (2006). Dssim-ontology mapping with uncertainty. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM’06) (pp. 115–123).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, D., & Bellahsene, Z. (2012). Yam++: A multi-strategy based approach for ontology matching task. In Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW’12) (pp. 421–425).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy, N. F. (2004). Semantic integration: A survey of ontology-based approaches. SIGMOD Record, 33, 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riain, S. (2012). Semantic Paths in Business Filings Analysis (Ph.D. thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riain, S., Curry, E., & Harth, A. (2011). XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(2), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shvaiko, P., & Euzenat, J. (2013). Ontology matching: State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 25(1), 158–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, W. D., Roberts, A., Rogers, J. E., Wroe, C. J., & Rector, A. L. (2000). Having our cake and eating it too: How the galen intermediate representation reconciles internal complexity with users’ requirements for appropriateness and simplicity. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, American Medical Informatics Association (pp. 819–823).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohr, D., Hollink, L., & Cimiano, P. (2011). A machine learning approach to multilingual and cross-lingual ontology matching. In Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’11) (pp. 665–680).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdin, T., Maguet, G., & Thomas, S. (2012). Promoting XBRL for cross-border data exchange by business registers in europe. Interactive Business Reporting, 2, 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this chapter has been funded in part by the EU FP7 Activity ICT-4-2.2 under Grant Agreement No. 248458, Multilingual Ontologies for Networked Knowledge (MONNET) project, and by the DFG Research Unit FOR 1513, project B1. We would especially like to thank the xEBR Working GroupFootnote 19 for their help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Marie Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, S.M., Wu, X., Ma, Y., O’Riain, S. (2014). Semantically Assisted XBRL-Taxonomy Alignment Across Languages. In: Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P. (eds) Towards the Multilingual Semantic Web. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43585-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43585-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43584-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43585-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics