Back to User-Centered Usability Testing | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Back to User-Centered Usability Testing

  • Conference paper
Human Factors in Computing and Informatics (SouthCHI 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7946))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Usability testing is a widely used evaluation method for product design during and after the development. Conventional usability testing applies short and discrete test tasks and task scenarios that are based on the tasks the product is designed to support. Thus, conventional test task design relies heavily on the representations of the specified context of use and the specified user requirements of the proposed design solution. However, a premature commitment to the specified context, requirements and proposed solutions may limit the scope of usability testing in a manner that hinders its capability to elicit and validate new user requirements, which is one of the objectives of the evaluation phase in the iterative user-centered design process. In this paper, we introduce a user-centered task design approach, which allows test participants to follow their natural work flow and freely express their needs during a test session. The main idea of this open-ended task approach is to break the tight link between the produced design solutions and the tasks used in the usability test and in this way increase the probability that novel user needs can emerge during a test session. Empirical results from a case study are used to depict the approach and its prerequisites, strengths, and limitations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dumas, J., Saparova, D.: The First Seven Years of the JUS. Journal of Usability Studies 8, 1–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.-Y., Smith, P.W., Carey, T.: A Survey of User-Centered Design Practice. In: CHI 2002, pp. 471–478. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnum, C.M.: Usability testing essentials: ready, set...test!. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dumas, J., Redish, J.: A practical guide to usability testing, revised edn. Intellect Ltd., Exeter (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Curtis, B., Krasner, H., Iscoe, N.: A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM 31, 1268–1287 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chilana, P.K., Wobbrock, J.O., Ko, A.J.: Understanding usability practices in complex domains. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2010, pp. 2337–2346. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson, S., Robertson, J.: Mastering the Requirements Process. ACM Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jarke, M., Loucopoulos, P., Lyytinen, K., Mylopoulos, J., Robinson, W.: The brave new world of design requirements. Information Systems 36, 992–1008 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Redish, J.: Expanding Usability Testing to Evaluate Complex Systems. Journal of Usability Studies 2, 102–111 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cordes, R.E.: Task-Selection Bias: A Case for User Defined Tasks. Int. J. of Human Computer Interaction 13(4), 411–419 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Diaper, D.: Scenarios and task analysis. Interacting with Computers 14, 379–395 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9241-11:1998 Guidance on usability (1998), http://www.iso.org

  13. Ferré, X., Juristo, N., Windl, H., Constantine, L.: Usability Basics for Software Developers. IEEE Software 18, 22–29 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9241-210:2010 Human-centred design for interactive system (2010), http://www.iso.org

  15. Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: User-centered design. In: Bainbridge, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Diaper, D., Stanton, N.A.: The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers, Mahwah (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. Academic Press, San Diego (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K., Baker, L.: An Agile Customer-Centered Method: Rapid Contextual Design. In: Zannier, C., Erdogmus, H., Lindstrom, L. (eds.) XP/Agile Universe 2004. LNCS, vol. 3134, pp. 50–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooper, A.: The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. SAMS, Indianapolis (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bødker, S.: Scenarios in user-centred design—setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting with Computers 13, 61–75 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. International Organization for Standardization.: ISO 13407:1999 Human-centred design processes for interactive systems (1999), http://www.iso.org

  24. Suchman, L.: Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine interaction. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wagner, E.L., Scott, S.V., Galliers, R.D.: The creation of ‘best practice’ software: myth, reality and ethics. Information and Organization 16, 251–275 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gasser, L.: The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 3, 205–225 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ciborra, C.U.: From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford University Press, UK (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tarkkanen, K.: Business process modeling for non-uniform work. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) Enterprise Information Systems. LNBIP, vol. 19, pp. 188–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Rubin, J., Chisnell, D.: Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design and conduct effective tests, 2nd edn. Wiley Publishing Inc., Indianapolis (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson, C.: Taking usability practitioners to task. Interactions 14, 48–49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kuniavsky, M.: Observing the user experience: a practioner’s guide to user research. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. van Waes, L.: Thinking Aloud as a Method for Testing the Usability of Websites: The Influence of Task Variation on the Evaluation of Hypertext. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 43, 279–291 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. van den Haak, M.J., de Jong, M.D.T., Schellens, P.J.: Evaluating Municipal Websites: A Methodological Comparison of Three Think Aloud Variants. Government Information Quarterly 26, 193–202 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Albers, M.J.: Design and Usability: Beginner Interactions with Complex Software. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 41, 271–287 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Mirel, B.: Dynamic usability: designing usefulness into systems for complex tasks. In: Albers, M.J., Mazur, B. (eds.) Content and complexity: Information Design in Technical Communication, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lindgaard, G., Chattratichart, J.: Usability testing: What have we overlooked? In: Proceedings of CHI 2007, pp. 1415–1424. ACM Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Molich, R., Dumas, J.S.: Comparative usability evaluation (CUE-4). Behaviour & Information Technology 27, 263–281 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Alshamari, M., Mayhew, P.: Task design: Its impact on usability testing. In: The Third International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, pp. 583–589. IEEE Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Atladottir, G., Hvannberg, E.T., Gunnarsdottir, S.: Comparing task practicing and prototype fidelities when applying scenario acting to elicit requirements. Requirements Engineering 17, 157–170 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lindgaard, G., Dillon, R., Trbovich, P., White, R., Fernandes, G., Lundahl, S., Pinnamaneni, A.: User Needs Analysis and Requirements Engineering: Theory and Practice. Int. Comp. 18, 47–70 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Anastassova, M., Mégard, C., Burkhardt, J.-M.: Prototype evaluation and user-needs analysis in the early design of emerging technologies. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4550, pp. 383–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

    Kimmo Tarkkanen, Pekka Reijonen & Ville Harkke

  2. Department of Informatics and Media, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Franck Tétard

Authors
  1. Kimmo Tarkkanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pekka Reijonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Franck Tétard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ville Harkke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation (IMI), Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 2/V, 8036, Graz, Austria

    Andreas Holzinger

  2. Human-Computer Interaction Center, RWTH Aachen University, Theaterplatz 14, 52056, Aachen, Germany

    Martina Ziefle

  3. Institute of Informatics Systems, Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Universitätsstrasse 65-67, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Martin Hitz

  4. Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia

    Matjaž Debevc

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tarkkanen, K., Reijonen, P., Tétard, F., Harkke, V. (2013). Back to User-Centered Usability Testing. In: Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M., Hitz, M., Debevc, M. (eds) Human Factors in Computing and Informatics. SouthCHI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39061-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39062-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation