Abstract
We investigate how the behaviors of malicious trusted parties affect participants of optimistic non-repudiation protocols. We introduce a notion of risk balance for exchange protocols. Intuitively, risk balance refers to fairness in the amount of protection a protocol offers to the participants against malicious trustees. We explore how risk balance relates to the notions of accountable trustees and transparent trustees previously introduced by Asokan and Micali, respectively. As a case study, we investigate the consequences of malicious behaviors of trusted parties in the context of two fair non-repudiation protocols, proposed by Gürgens, Rudolph and Vogt (2005). We discover a number of security issues in these protocols and propose simple solutions for fixing them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asokan, N.: Fairness in electronic commerce. PhD thesis. University of Waterloo (1998)
Asokan, N., Shoup, V., Waidner, M.: Asynchronous protocols for optimistic fair exchange. In: IEEE Security and Privacy 1998, pp. 86–99. IEEE CS (1998)
Ateniese, G., de Medeiros, B., Goodrich, M.: TRICERT: A distributed certified e-mail scheme. In: NDSS 2001. Internet Society (2001)
Buttyán, L., Hubaux, J., Capkun, S.: A formal model of rational exchange and its application to the analysis of Syverson’s protocol. J. Computer Security 12(3-4), 551–587 (2004)
Chadha, R., Mitchell, J., Scedrov, A., Shmatikov, V.: Contract Signing, Optimism, and Advantage. In: Amadio, R.M., Lugiez, D. (eds.) CONCUR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2761, pp. 366–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Dolev, D., Yao, A.: On the security of public key protocols. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory IT-29(2), 198–208 (1983)
Franklin, M., Reiter, M.: Fair exchange with a semi-trusted third party (extended abstract). In: ACM CCS 1997, pp. 1–5. ACM Press (1997)
Gürgens, S., Rudolph, C., Vogt, H.: On the security of fair non-repudiation protocols. Int. J. Inf. Sec. 4(4), 253–262 (2005)
Imamoto, K., Zhou, J., Sakurai, K.: An Evenhanded Certified Email System for Contract Signing. In: Qing, S., Mao, W., López, J., Wang, G. (eds.) ICICS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3783, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Micali, S.: Simple and fast optimistic protocols for fair electronic exchange. In: PODC 2003, pp. 12–19. ACM Press (2003)
Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press (1999)
Pagnia, H., Vogt, H., Gärtner, F.: Fair exchange. The Computer Journal 46(1), 55–57 (2003)
Ray, I., Ray, I., Natarajan, N.: An anonymous and failure resilient fair-exchange e-commerce protocol. Decision Support Systems 39(3), 267–292 (2005)
Sandholm, T., Wang, X.: (Im)possibility of safe exchange mechanism design. In: 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 338–344. AAAI (2002)
Schunter, M.: Optimistic fair exchange. PhD thesis, Universität des Saarlandese (2000)
Srivatsa, M., Xiong, L., Liu, L.: ExchangeGuard: A distributed protocol for electronic fair-exchange. In: IPDPS 2005, p. 105b. IEEE CS (2005)
Torabi Dashti, M., Wang, Y.: Risk Balance in Exchange Protocols. In: Cervesato, I. (ed.) ASIAN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4846, pp. 70–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Torabi Dashti, M., Cederquist, J., Wang, Y. (2012). Risk Balance in Optimistic Non-repudiation Protocols. In: Barthe, G., Datta, A., Etalle, S. (eds) Formal Aspects of Security and Trust. FAST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7140. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29420-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29420-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29419-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29420-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)