Cardio Online Reader/COR: A Web 2.0-Based Tool Aimed at Clinical Decision-Making Support in Cardiology | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Cardio Online Reader/COR: A Web 2.0-Based Tool Aimed at Clinical Decision-Making Support in Cardiology

  • Conference paper
Electronic Healthcare (eHealth 2011)

Abstract

There is a wide acceptance of the fact, that processes of clinical decision-making has to be based on sound scientific evidence. But in the context of a rapidly growing amount of new information, it is increasingly difficult task. That is why specialized tools and resources enabling to quickly and efficiently search and disseminate relevant evidence are needed. Web 2.0 is a platform that provides an armamentarium with great potential to contribute to solving this task. This paper presents a newly developed information resource aimed at support of clinical decision making in cardiology called Cardio Online Reader/COR. The COR provides the best available evidence from database MEDLINE/PubMed by means of an online application equipped with tools and services typical for Web 2.0. A beta-version of the application is freely accessible at http://neo.euromise.cz/cor .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eddy, D.M.: Evidence-based medicine: a unified approach. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 24(1), 9–17 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moyer, V.: Evidence based medicine: is it practical? Arch. Dis. Child. 89(5), 399–400 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. King, J.F.: A short history of evidence-based obstetric care. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics &Gynaecology 19(1), 3–14 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Straus, S., Haynes, R.B.: Managing evidence-based knowledge: the need for reliable, relevant and readable resources. CMAJ 180(9), 942–945 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williamson, J.W., German, P.S., Weiss, R., Skinner, E.A., Bowes, F.: Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. Annals of Internal Medicine 110(2), 151–160 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, R.: What clinical information do doctors need? BMJ: British Medical Journal 313(7064), 1062–1068 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glasziou, P., Del Mar, C., Salisbury, J.: Evidence-Based Medicine Workbook, 1st edn. BMJ Publishing Group, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gray, J.A.M.: Where’s the chief knowledge officer? To manage the most precious resource of all. BMJ: British Medical Journal 317(7162), 832–840 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoogendam, A., Stalenhoef, A., Robbe, P., Overbeke, A.J.: Analysis of queries sent to PubMed at the point of care: Observation of search behaviour in a medical teaching hospital. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 8(1), 42 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oxman, A.D., Guyatt, G.H.: The science of reviewing research. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 703, 125–134 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McColl, A., Smith, H., White, P., Field, J.: General practitioners perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 316(7128), 361–365 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guyatt, G.H., Meade, M.O., Jaeschke, R.Z., Cook, D.J., Haynes, R.B.: Practitioners of evidence based care: Not all clinicians need to appraise evidence from scratch but all need some skills. BMJ: British Medical Journal 320(7240), 954–955 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haynes, R.B., Haines, A.: Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. BMJ: British Medical Journal 317, 273–276 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang, H., Ng, J.H.K.: Googling for a diagnosis–use of Google as a diagnostic aid: internet based study. BMJ 333(7579), 1143–1145 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giustini, D.: How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. BMJ: British Medical Journal 333(7582), 1283 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karkalis, G.I., Koutsouris, D.D.: E-health and the Web 2.0. In: itab 2006, Congress Center Du Lac, Ioannina, Greece (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Papíková, V., Zvolský, M. (2012). Cardio Online Reader/COR: A Web 2.0-Based Tool Aimed at Clinical Decision-Making Support in Cardiology. In: Kostkova, P., Szomszor, M., Fowler, D. (eds) Electronic Healthcare. eHealth 2011. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 91. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29262-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29262-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29261-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29262-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics