Abstract
Social psychological research demonstrates that the same behavior might lead to different evaluations depending on whether it is shown by a man or a woman. With a view to design decisions with regard to virtual humans it is relevant to test whether this pattern also applies to gendered virtual humans. In a 2x2 between subjects experiment we manipulated the Rapport Agent’s gaze behavior and its gender in order to test whether especially female agents are evaluated more negatively when they do not show gender specific immediacy behavior and avoid gazing at the interaction partner. Instead of this interaction effect we found two main effects: gaze avoidance was evaluated negatively and female agents were rated more positively than male agents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ruttkay, Z., Pelachaud, C. (eds.): From brows to trust: evaluating embodied conversational agents. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)
Krämer, N.C.: Soziale Wirkungen virtueller Helfer. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart (2008)
Krämer, N.C., Hoffmann, L., Kopp, S.: Know Your Users! Empirical Results for Tailoring an Agent´s Nonverbal Behavior to Different User Groups. In: Safonova, A. (ed.) IVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6356, pp. 468–474. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Cowell, A.J., Stanney, K.M.: Embodiment and Interaction Guidelines for Designing Credible, Trustworthy Embodied Conversational Agents. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 301–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Deutsch, F.M., LeBaron, D., Fryer, M.M.: What is in a smile? Psychology of Women Quarterly 11, 341–352 (1987)
Argyle, M., Dean, J.: Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry 28, 289–304 (1965)
Burgoon, J.K., Coker, D.A., Coker, R.A.: Communicative effects of gaze behavior. Human Communication Research 12, 495–524 (1986)
Gratch, J., Okhmatovskaia, A., Lamothe, F., Marsella, S.C., Morales, M., van der Werf, R.J., Morency, L.-P.: Virtual rapport. In: Gratch, J., Young, M., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P. (eds.) IVA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4133, pp. 14–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Gratch, J., Wang, N., Gerten, J., Fast, E., Duffy, R.: Creating rapport with virtual agents. In: Pelachaud, C., Martin, J.-C., André, E., Chollet, G., Karpouzis, K., Pelé, D. (eds.) IVA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4722, pp. 125–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Tickle-Degnen, L., Rosenthal, R.: The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry 1, 285–293 (1990)
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. In: Kendon, A. (ed.) Nonverbal Communication, Interaction, and Gesture, pp. 57–106. Mouton, The Hague (1981)
Matsumoto, D., Keltner, D., Shiota, M.N., O’Sullivan, M., Frank, M.: Facial Expressions of Emotion. In: Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J.M., Barrett, L.F. (eds.) Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edn., pp. 211–234. The Guilford Press, New York (2008)
Richmond, V.P., McCroskey, J.C., Payne, S.K.: Nonverbal Behaviour in Interpersonal Relations, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)
Anstis, S.M., Mayhew, J.W., Morley, T.: The perception of where a face or television ‘portrait’ is looking. The American Journal of Psychology 82, 474–489 (1969)
Gibson, J.J., Pick, A.D.: Perception of another person’s looking behavior. The American Journal of Psychology 78, 386–394 (1963)
Duncan Jr., S.: Nonverbal communication. Psychological Bulletin 72, 118–137 (1969)
Burgoon, J.K., Bacue, A.E.: Nonverbal communication skills. In: Greene, J.O., Burleson, B.R. (eds.) Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills, pp. 179–220. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)
Exline, R., Gray, D., Schuette, D.: Visual behavior in a dyad as affected by interview content and sex of respondent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1, 201–209 (1965)
Ickes, W., Barnes, R.D.: The role of sex and self-monitoring in unstructured dyadic interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 315–330 (1977)
Briton, N.J., Hall, J.A.: Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles 32, 79–90 (1995)
Fiske, S.T., Stevens, L.E.: What’s so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In: Oskamp, S., Costanzo, M. (eds.) Gender Issues in Contemporary Society, pp. 173–196. Sage, Newbury Park (1993)
Devine, P.G.: Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56, 5–18 (1989)
Nass, C., Moon, Y., Green, N.: Are machines gender neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27, 864–876 (1997)
Moon, Y.: Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. The Journal of Consumer Research 26, 323–339 (2000)
Kang, S., Gratch, J.: People like virtual counselors hat highly-disclose about themselves. The Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine (in press, 2011)
Watson, D., Tellegen, A., Clark, L.A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1063–1070 (1988)
Von der Pütten, A., Krämer, N.C., Gratch, J., Kang, S.-H.: “It doesn’t matter what you are¡‘ Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computer in Human Behavior 26, 1641–1650 (2010)
Bem, S.L.: The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42, 155–162 (1974)
Bailenson, J.N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., Loomis, J.M.: Equilibrium theory revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence 10, 583–598 (2001)
Biocca, F., Harms, C., Gregg, J.: The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Paper presented at the 4th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Philadelphia (2001)
Cheek, J.M.: The Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale. Wellesley College, Wellesley (1983)
Davis, M.: A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology 10, 85 (1980)
Carney, D.R., Harrigan, J.A.: It takes one to know one: Interpersonal sensitivity is related to accurate assessments of others’ interpersonal sensitivity. Emotion 3, 194–200 (2003)
Riggio, R.E.: The Social Skills Inventory (SSI): Measuring nonverbal and social skills. In: Manusov, V. (ed.) The Sourcebook of Nonverbal Measures: Going Beyond Words, pp. 23–31. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)
Morency, L.-P., Sidner, C.L., Lee, C., Darrell, T.: Contextual recognition of head gestures. In: 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interactions, Toronto, Italy (2005)
Mehrabian, A.: Nonverbal communication. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago (1972)
Bavelas, J.B., Coates, L., Johnson, T.: Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication 52, 566–580 (2002)
Duncan Jr., S.: Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23, 283–292 (1972)
Hogg, R.V., Tanis, E.A.: Probability and Statistical Inference. Macmillan, New York (1988)
Kipp, M., Gebhard, P.: IGaze: Studying Reactive Gaze Behavior in Semi-immersive Human-Avatar Interactions. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 191–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kulms, P., Krämer, N.C., Gratch, J., Kang, SH. (2011). It’s in Their Eyes: A Study on Female and Male Virtual Humans’ Gaze. In: Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Thórisson, K.R. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6895. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23973-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23974-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)