Abstract
When applying search-based software engineering (SBSE) techniques one is confronted with a multitude of different parameters that need to be chosen: Which population size for a genetic algorithm? Which selection mechanism to use? What settings to use for dozens of other parameters? This problem not only troubles users who want to apply SBSE tools in practice, but also researchers performing experimentation – how to compare algorithms that can have different parameter settings? To shed light on the problem of parameters, we performed the largest empirical analysis on parameter tuning in SBSE to date, collecting and statistically analysing data from more than a million experiments. As case study, we chose test data generation, one of the most popular problems in SBSE. Our data confirm that tuning does have a critical impact on algorithmic performance, and over-fitting of parameter tuning is a dire threat to external validity of empirical analyses in SBSE. Based on this large empirical evidence, we give guidelines on how to handle parameter tuning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harman, M., Mansouri, S.A., Zhang, Y.: Search based software engineering: A comprehensive analysis and review of trends techniques and applications. Technical Report TR-09-03, King’s College (2009)
Ali, S., Briand, L., Hemmati, H., Panesar-Walawege, R.: A systematic review of the application and empirical investigation of search-based test-case generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 36(6), 742–762 (2010)
Vos, T., Baars, A., Lindlar, F., Kruse, P., Windisch, A., Wegener, J.: Industrial Scaled Automated Structural Testing with the Evolutionary Testing Tool. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), pp. 175–184 (2010)
Arcuri, A., Iqbal, M.Z., Briand, L.: Black-box system testing of real-time embedded systems using random and search-based testing. In: Petrenko, A., Simão, A., Maldonado, J.C. (eds.) ICTSS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6435, pp. 95–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Wolpert, D.H., Macready, W.G.: No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1(1), 67–82 (1997)
Fraser, G., Arcuri, A.: Evolutionary generation of whole test suites. In: International Conference On Quality Software, QSIC (2011)
Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, New York (1997)
Eiben, A., Michalewicz, Z., Schoenauer, M., Smith, J.: Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. Parameter Setting in Evolutionary Algorithms, 19–46 (2007)
Smit, S., Eiben, A.: Parameter tuning of evolutionary algorithms: Generalist vs. specialist. Applications of Evolutionary Computation, 542–551 (2010)
Bartz-Beielstein, T., Markon, S.: Tuning search algorithms for real-world applications: A regression tree based approach. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1111–1118 (2004)
Poulding, S., Clark, J., Waeselynck, H.: A principled evaluation of the effect of directed mutation on search-based statistical testing. In: International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing, SBST (2011)
Da Costa, L., Schoenauer, M.: Bringing evolutionary computation to industrial applications with GUIDE. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), pp. 1467–1474 (2009)
Arcuri, A.: A theoretical and empirical analysis of the role of test sequence length in software testing for structural coverage. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2011), http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TSE.2011.44
Tonella, P.: Evolutionary testing of classes. In: ISSTA 2004: Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pp. 119–128. ACM, New York (2004)
Fraser, G., Zeller, A.: Mutation-driven generation of unit tests and oracles. In: ISSTA 2010: Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pp. 147–158. ACM, New York (2010)
Wappler, S., Lammermann, F.: Using evolutionary algorithms for the unit testing of object-oriented software. In: GECCO 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1053–1060. ACM, New York (2005)
Ribeiro, J.C.B.: Search-based test case generation for object-oriented Java software using strongly-typed genetic programming. In: GECCO 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 GECCO Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1819–1822. ACM, New York (2008)
McMinn, P.: Search-based software test data generation: A survey. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability 14(2), 105–156 (2004)
Fraser, G., Arcuri, A.: It is not the length that matters, it is how you control it. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation, ICST (2011)
Arcuri, A., Briand, L.: A practical guide for using statistical tests to assess randomized algorithms in software engineering. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Arcuri, A., Fraser, G. (2011). On Parameter Tuning in Search Based Software Engineering. In: Cohen, M.B., Ó Cinnéide, M. (eds) Search Based Software Engineering. SSBSE 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6956. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23716-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23716-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23715-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23716-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)