Abstract
SDL, ITU’s Specification and Description Language, supports developing systems in a modular and hierarchical way, based on structural type definitions and their instantiations. Also, reuse is supported by the possibility to define collections of type definitions, e.g., as SDL packages, that can be used in different systems. Another important development task that can be supported by packages is the replacement of system parts, i.e., structural instances. This can be achieved, for instance, by replacing the type definition to which an instantiation refers by using another package containing a compatible type. However, we have found that this apparently elegant solution reveals some intricacies in practice. To fully exploit the benefits of packages for the development of complex systems and system versioning, type definitions are typically collected in a considerable number of packages. Moreover, there usually are numerous dependencies among packages, which make their management an error-prone task. Finally, it is not clear which types are compatible such that they can be used as mutual replacements. In this paper, we propose a clean solution for the replacement of system parts. Therefore, we introduce a concept that we call SDL module, which we use to capture compatibility of structural type definitions and replacement rules. We illustrate the applicability of our approach by presenting an in-house development tool to automate the replacement process. This tool can be utilized to speed up the development process, and adapt SDL systems to different platforms and scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
International Telecommunication Union: Recommendation Z.100, Specification and Description Language (SDL) (November 2007), http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Z.100/en
Ellsberger, J., Hogrefe, D., Sarma, A.: SDL– Formal Object-oriented Language for Communication Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)
IBM: Rational SDL Suite (2011), http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/sdlsuite
Fliege, I., Geraldy, A., Gotzhein, R., Schaible, P.: A Flexible Micro Protocol Framework. In: Amyot, D., Williams, A.W. (eds.) SAM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3319, pp. 224–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Oracle Corporation: Java (2011), http://java.sun.com
Apache Software Foundation: Maven (2011 ), http://maven.apache.org/
Free Software Foundation, Inc.: GNU Make (2011), http://www.gnu.org/software/make/
Networked Systems Group: SPaSs Tool Home Page (2011), http://vs.cs.uni-kl.de/activities/spass/
International Telecommunication Union: Recommendation Z.106: Common Interchange Format for SDL (August 2002), http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Z.106/en
Fliege, I., Grammes, R., Weber, C.: ConTraST - A Configurable SDL Transpiler and Runtime Environment. In: Gotzhein, R., Reed, R. (eds.) SAM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4320, pp. 216–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2006); Revised Selected Papers
Apache Software Foundation: Subversion (2011), http://subversion.apache.org/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Becker, P., Krämer, M. (2011). SDL Modules – Concepts and Tool Support. In: Kraemer, F.A., Herrmann, P. (eds) System Analysis and Modeling: About Models. SAM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6598. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21652-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21652-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21651-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21652-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)