Abstract
We present a model of social network that shows a dynamic emergent behavior simulating actors that exchange knowledge based on their preferences, expertise and friendship relations. The network presents a stochastic interaction behavior that tends to create communities, driven by the assortative mixing and triadic closures. Our first research goal is to investigate the features driving the formation of communities and their characteristics under different configurations of the network. In particular we focus on trust which we analyze qualitatively as dependent on the frequency and pattern of interactions. To this aim, we ran simulations of different network configurations and analyzed the resulting statistics. The second research goal is to study the effects of node deception and cooperation on the social network behavior; our primary metric is trust and we evaluated how, under specific conditions, it is possible to manipulate trust in some non trivial ways.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, R., Barabasi, A.L.: Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74(1), 47–97 (2002)
Barber, B.: The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Rutgers University Press (1983)
Burt, R.S.: Bandwidth and echo: Trust, information, and gossip in social networks. In: Casella, A., Rauch, J.E. (eds.) Networks and Markets: Contributions from Economics and Sociology. Russell Sage Foundation, Thousand Oaks (2001)
Golbeck, J.: Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks. ACM Trans. Web, 3:12:1–12:33 (September 2009)
Hanaki, N., Peterhansl, A., Dodds, P., Watts, D.: Cooperation in evolving social networks. Management Science 53(7), 1036–1050 (2007)
Holme, P., Beom, J.K., Chang, N.Y., Seung, K.H.: Attack vulnerability of complex networks. Physical Review E 65(056109) (2002)
Jin, E.M., Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Structure of growing social networks. Physical Review E 64(4), 046132+ (2001)
Newman, M.E.J.: The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98(2), 404–409 (2001)
Newman, M.E.J.: Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 5200–5205 (2004)
Newman, M.E.J., Girvan, M.: Mixing patterns and community structure in networks. In: Pastor-Satorras, R., Rubi, M., Diaz-Guilera, A. (eds.) Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 625, pp. 66–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Newman, M., Barabasi, A.L., Watts, D.J.: The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)
Newman, M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(2), 167–256 (2003)
Newman, M.E.J., Park, J.: Why social networks are different from other types of networks. Physical Review E 68(3) (2003)
Pastor-Satorras, R., Vazquez, A., Vespignani, A.: Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet. Phis. Rev. Lett. 87(258701) (2001)
Santos, F.C., Pacheco, J.M., Lenaerts, T.: Cooperation prevails when individuals adjust their social ties. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2(10), e140 (2006)
Skyrms, B., Pemantle, R.: A dynamic model of social network formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97(16), 9340–9346 (2000)
Strogatz, S.H.: Exploring complex networks. Nature 410, 268–276 (2001)
Thomborson, C.: Axiomatic and behavioural trust. In: Acquisti, A., Smith, S.W., Sadeghi, A.-R. (eds.) TRUST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6101, pp. 352–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Tyler, J.R., Wilkinson, D.M., Huberman, B.A.: Email as spectroscopy: automated discovery of community structure within organizations, pp. 81–96. Kluwer, B.V., The Netherlands (2003)
Walter, F.E., Battiston, S., Schweitzer, F.: A model of a trust-based recommendation system on a social network. Auton. Agent Multi-Agent Syst. 16(1), 57–74 (2008)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Allodi, L., Chiodi, L., Cremonini, M. (2011). Modifying Trust Dynamics through Cooperation and Defection in Evolving Social Networks. In: McCune, J.M., Balacheff, B., Perrig, A., Sadeghi, AR., Sasse, A., Beres, Y. (eds) Trust and Trustworthy Computing. Trust 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6740. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21599-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21599-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21598-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21599-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)