Interval Analysis for Concurrent Trace Programs Using Transaction Sequence Graphs | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Interval Analysis for Concurrent Trace Programs Using Transaction Sequence Graphs

  • Conference paper
Runtime Verification (RV 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6418))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Concurrent trace programs (CTPs) are slices of the concurrent programs that generate the concrete program execution traces, where inter-thread event order specific to the given traces are relaxed. For such CTPs, we introduce transaction sequence graph (TSG) as a model for efficient concurrent data flow analysis. The TSG is a digraph of thread-local control nodes and edges corresponding to transactions and possible context-switches. Such a graph captures all the representative interleavings of these nodes/transactions. We use a mutually atomic transaction (MAT) based partial order reduction to construct such a TSG. We also present a non-trivial improvement to the original MAT analysis to further reduce the TSG sizes. As an application, we have used interval analysis in our experiments to show that TSG leads to more precise intervals and more time/space efficient concurrent data flow analysis than the standard models such as concurrent control flow graph.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Savage, S., Burrows, M., Nelson, G., Sobalvarro, P., Anderson, T.: Eraser: a dynamic data race detector for multithreaded programs. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Flanagan, C., Freund, S.N.: Atomizer: A dynamic atomcity checker for multithreaded programs. In: Proc. of IPDPS (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, M., Bodik, R., Hill, M.D.: A serializability violation detector for shared-memory server programs. In: Programming Language Design and Implementation (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, L., Stoller, S.D.: Runtime analysis of atomicity for multithreaded programs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farzan, A., Madhusudan, P.: Monitoring atomicity in concurrent programs. In: Gupta, A., Malik, S. (eds.) CAV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5123, pp. 52–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadowski, C., Freund, S.N., Flanagan, C.: Singletrack: A dynamic determinism checker for multithreaded programs. In: Castagna, G. (ed.) ESOP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5502, pp. 394–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Farzan, A., Madhusudan, P.: Meta-analysis for atomicity violations under nested locking. In: Gupta, A., Malik, S. (eds.) CAV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5123. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, L., Stoller, S.D.: Accurate and efficient runtime detection of atomicity errors in concurrent programs. In: Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flanagan, C., Godefroid, P.: Dynamic partial-order reduction for model checking software. In: Proc. of POPL (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Musuvathi, M., Quadeer, S.: CHESS: Systematic stress testing of concurrent software. In: Puebla, G. (ed.) LOPSTR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4407, pp. 15–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, Y., Chen, X., Gopalakrishnan, G.: Inspect: A Runtime Model Checker for Multi-threaded C Programs. Technical Report UUCS-08-004, University of Utah (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, C., Limaye, R., Ganai, M., Gupta, A.: Trace-based symbolic analysis for atomicity violations. In: Esparza, J., Majumdar, R. (eds.) TACAS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6015, pp. 328–342. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kundu, S., Ganai, M., Wang, C.: CONTESSA: CONcurrency TESting Augmented with Symbolic Analysis. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) Computer Aided Verification. LNCS, vol. 6174. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Long, D.L., Clarke, L.A.: Task interaction graphs for concurrent analysis. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dwyer, M.B., Clarke, L.A.: Data flow analysis for verifying properties of concurrent programs. In: International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J., Padua, D.A., Midkiff, S.P.: Basic compiler algorithms for parallel programs. Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Farzan, A., Madhusudan, P.: Causal dataflow analysis for concurrent programs. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4424, pp. 102–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Chugh, R., Voung, J.W., Jhala, R., Lerer, S.: Dataflow analysis for concurrent programs using datarace detection. In: Programming Language Design and Implementation (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lal, A., Touili, T., Kidd, N., Reps, T.: Interprocedural analysis of concurrent programs under a context bound. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4963, pp. 282–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahlon, V., Sankaranarayanan, S., Gupta, A.: Semantic reduction of thread interleavings in concurrent programs. In: Kowalewski, S., Philippou, A. (eds.) TACAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5505, pp. 134-138. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, F., Roşu, G.: Parametric and sliced causality. In: Damm, W., Hermanns, H. (eds.) CAV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4590, pp. 240–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Gueta, G., Flanagan, C., Yahav, E., Sagiv, M.: Cartesian partial-order reduction. In: Bošnački, D., Edelkamp, S. (eds.) SPIN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4595, pp. 95–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Edelstein, O., Farchi, E., Goldin, E., Nir, Y., Ratsaby, G., Ur, S.: Framework for Testing Multi-threaded Java Programs. In: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sen, K.: Race directed random testing of concurrent programs. In: PLDI (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, C., Chaudhuri, S., Gupta, A., Yang, Y.: Symbolic pruning of concurrent program executions. In: ESEC-FSE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ganai, M.K., Kundu, S.: Reduction of Verification Conditions for Concurrent System using Mutually Atomic Transactions. In: Păsăreanu, C.S. (ed.) SPIN Workshop. LNCS, vol. 5578, pp. 68–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Lamport, L.: How to make multiprocessor computer that correctly executes multiprocess programs. IEEE Transactions on Computers (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ganai, M. K.: Conference Notes, http://www.nec-labs.com/~malay/notes.htm

  29. Rugina, R., Rinard, M.C.: Symbolic bounds analysis of pointers, array indices, and accessed memory regions. In: Programming Language Design and Implementation (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lu, S., Tucekt, J., Qin, F., Zhou, Y.: AVIO: detecting atomicity violations via access interleaving invariants. In: Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Farchi, E., Nir, Y., Ur, S.: Concurrent bug patterns and how to test them. In: Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. System Analysis and Verification Team. NECLA SAV Benchmarks, http://www.nec-labs.com/research/system/systems_SAV-website/benchmarks.php

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ganai, M.K., Wang, C. (2010). Interval Analysis for Concurrent Trace Programs Using Transaction Sequence Graphs. In: Barringer, H., et al. Runtime Verification. RV 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6418. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16612-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16612-9_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16611-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16612-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics