Abstract
We propose two indices of collusion among Judges of objects or events in a context of subjective evaluation, and an average based on these indices. The aim is manifold: to serve as a reference point for appeals against the results of voting already undertaken, to improve the quality of scores summarized for awards by eliminating those that are less certain, and, indirectly, to provide an incentive for reliable evaluations. An algorithm for automatic computation is supplied. The possible uses of this technique in various fields of application are pointed out: from Economics to Finance, Insurance, Arts, artistic sports and so on.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gambarelli, G.: The coherent majority average for juries evaluation processes. Journal of Sport Sciences 26, 1091–1095 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bertini, C., Gambarelli, G., Uristani, A. (2010). Indices of Collusion among Judges and an Anti-collusion Average. In: Greco, S., Marques Pereira, R.A., Squillante, M., Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Preferences and Decisions. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 257. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15976-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15976-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15975-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15976-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)