Abstract
Space satellites are examples of complex embedded systems. Dynamic behaviour of such systems is typically described in terms of operational modes that correspond to the different stages of a mission and states of the components. Components are susceptible to various faults that complicate the mode transition scheme. Yet the success of a mission depends on the correct implementation of mode changes. In this paper we propose a formal approach that ensures consistency of mode changes while developing a system architecture by refinement. The approach relies on recursive application of modelling and refinement patterns that enforce correctness while implementing the mode transition scheme. The proposed approach is exemplified by the development of an Attitude and Orbit Control System undertaken within the ICT DEPLOY project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrial, J.-R.: The B-Book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Abrial, J.-R.: Modelling in Event-B. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
Back, R., Sere, K.: Superposition refinement of reactive systems. Formal Aspects of Computing 8(3), 1–23 (1996)
Buth, B.: Analysing mode confusion: An approach using fdr2. In: Heisel, M., Liggesmeyer, P., Wittmann, S. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3219, pp. 101–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Butler, R.W.: An introduction to requirements capture using PVS: Specification of a simple autopilot. Technical report, NASA TM-110255 (May 1996)
DEPLOY Deliverable D20 – Report on Pilot Deployment in the Space Sector. FP7 ICT DEPLOY Project (January 2010), http://www.deploy-project.eu/
Dotti, F., Iliasov, A., Ribeiro, L., Romanovsky, A.: Modal Systems: Specification, Refinement and Realisation. In: Breitman, K., Cavalcanti, A. (eds.) ICFEM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5885, Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Heimdahl, M., Leveson, N.: Completeness and Consistency in Hierarchical State-Based Requirements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22(6), 363–377 (1996)
Iliasov, A., Laibinis, L., Troubitsyna, E.: An Event-B model of the Attitude and Orbit Control System, http://deploy-eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
Iliasov, A., Troubitsyna, E., Laibinis, L., Romanovsky, A., Varpaaniemi, K., Ilic, D., Latvala, T.: Supporting Reuse in Event B Development: Modularisation Approach. In: Frappier, M., Glässer, U., Khurshid, S., Laleau, R., Reeves, S. (eds.) Abstract State Machines, Alloy, B and Z. LNCS, vol. 5977, pp. 174–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Industrial deployment of system engineering methods providing high dependability and productivity (DEPLOY). IST FP7 project, http://www.deploy-project.eu/
Laibinis, L., Troubitsyna, E.: Fault tolerance in a layered architecture: a general specification pattern in B. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM), Beijing, pp. 346–355. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2004)
Leveson, N., Pinnel, L.D., Sandys, S.D., Koga, S., Reese, J.D.: Analyzing Software Specifications for Mode Confusion Potential. In: Proc. of Workshop on Human Error and System Development, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 132–146 (1997)
Lopatkin, I., Iliasov, A., Romanovsky, A.: On fault tolerance reuse during refinement. In: Proc. of 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering for Resilient Systems (April 2010)
RODIN modularisation plug-in. Documentation at, http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Modularisation_Plug-in
Rubel, B.: Patterns for Generating a Layered Architecture. In: Coplien, J.O., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) Pattern Languages of Program Design, Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)
Rugina, A.E., Blanquart, J.P., Soumagne, R.: Validating failure detection isolation and recovery strategies using timed automata. In: Proc. of 12th European Workshop on Dependable Computing, EWDC 2009, Toulouse (2009)
Rushby, J.: Using model checking to help discover mode confusion and other automation suprises. In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 75, pp. 167–177 (2002)
The RODIN platform, http://rodin-b-sharp.sourceforge.net/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Iliasov, A. et al. (2010). Verifying Mode Consistency for On-Board Satellite Software. In: Schoitsch, E. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6351. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15650-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15651-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)