Abstract
Inter-organizational B2B systems are most likely tending to change their business requirements over time - e.g. establishing new partnerships or change existing ones. The problem is that business analysts design the business processes from scratch, disregarding the economic drivers of the business network. We propose to use business modeling techniques - such as REA (Resource-Event-Agents) - to ensure that business processes beneath do not violate the domain rules, i.e. to fulfill the basic economic principle for every business transaction - the give-and-take convention, called economic reciprocity. This helps us to quickly adapt the B2B processes to changing requirements without the need to change the overall architecture. In this paper we provide a mapping from REA, which represents one of the most prominent ontologies for business modeling, to UMM (UN/CEFACT’s Modeling Methodology), a standardized methodology for modeling the global choreography of inter-organizational business processes. We formalize the mapping by the use of the model-to-model transformation language ATL (Atlas Transformation Language).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dorn, J., Grün, C., Werthner, H., Zapletal, M.: From business to software: a B2B survey. Information Systems and E-Business Management 7(2), 123–142 (2009)
Wieringa, R., Pijpers, V., Bodenstaff, L., Gordijn, J.: Value-driven coordination process design using physical delivery models. Conceptual Modeling-ER (2008)
Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Value based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce idea. Requirements Engineering Journal 8(2), 114–134 (2003)
McCarthy, W.E.: The REA accounting model: A generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Accounting Review (1982)
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: An e-Business Model Ontology for Modeling e-Business. In: 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conf. (2002)
Schuster, R., Motal, T.: From e3-value to REA: Modeling Multi-party E-business Collaborations. In: Proceedings of the CEC 2009 (2009)
Huemer, C., Liegl, P., Schuster, R., Werthner, H., Zapletal, M.: Inter-organizational systems: From business values over business processes to deployment. In: Digital Ecosystems and Technologies. DEST 2008 (2008)
Hruby, P.: Model-Driven Design Using Business Patterns. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
ISO: Information technology - Business Operational View - Part 4: Business transaction scenarios, ISO/IEC, ISO 15944-4 (2007)
OASIS, UN/CEFACT: ebXML - Technical Architecture Specification, Version 1.4 (February 2001)
Hofreiter, B., Huemer, C., Liegl, P., Schuster, R., Zapletal, M.: UN/CEFACT’s Modeling Methodology (UMM): A UML Profile for B2B e-Commerce. In: Roddick, J., Benjamins, V.R., Si-said Cherfi, S., Chiang, R., Claramunt, C., Elmasri, R.A., Grandi, F., Han, H., Hepp, M., Lytras, M.D., Mišić, V.B., Poels, G., Song, I.-Y., Trujillo, J., Vangenot, C. (eds.) ER Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4231, pp. 19–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
UN/CEFACT: UN/CEFACT’s Modeling Methodology (UMM), UMM Meta Model 2.0, Public Draft V2.0 (2008)
UN/CEFACT: REA Specification Module for UN/CEFACT’s Modeling Methodology (UMM), Public Draft V1.0 (2008)
OMG/MOF: Meta Object Facility (MOF) specification, OMG Document ad/97-08-14 (1997)
ATLAS Group, INRIA, and LINA: ATL (Atlas Transformation Language) (2009), http://www.eclipse.org/m2m/atl/doc/
Weigand, H., Johannesson, P., Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Ilayperuma, T.: On the notion of value object. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 321–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Schmitt, M., Grégoire, B.: Risk Mitigation Instruments for Business Models and Process Models. In: Proc. REBNITA, vol. 5 (2005)
Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Ilayperuma, T., Johannesson, P., Gordijn, J., Grégoire, B., Schmitt, M., Dubois, E., Abels, S., Hahn, A., Wangler, B., Weigand, H.: Towards a reference ontology for business models. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2006. LNCS, vol. 4215, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Decreus, K., Poels, G.: Putting business into business process models. In: Proceedings of COMPSAC 2008 (2008)
Gordijn, J., Yu, E., van der Raadt, B.: e-Service Design Using i* and e3value Modeling. IEEE software 23(3), 26–33 (2006)
van der Raadt, B., Gordijn, J., Yu, E.: Exploring Web services from a business value perspective. In: Proc. 13th Int’l Requirements Eng., pp. 53–62 (2005)
Gailly, F., España, S., Poels, G., Pastor, O.: Integrating Business Domain Ontologies with Early Requirements Modelling. In: Song, I.-Y., Piattini, M., Chen, Y.-P.P., Hartmann, S., Grandi, F., Trujillo, J., Opdahl, A.L., Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., Caschera, M.C., Rolland, C., Woo, C., Salinesi, C., Zimányi, E., Claramunt, C., Frasincar, F., Houben, G.-J., Thiran, P. (eds.) ER Workshops 2008. LNCS, vol. 5232, pp. 282–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Gailly, F., Poels, G.: Using the REA Ontology to Create Interoperability between E-Collaboration Modeling Standards. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 395–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schuster, R., Motal, T., Huemer, C., Werthner, H. (2010). From Economic Drivers to B2B Process Models: A Mapping from REA to UMM. In: Abramowicz, W., Tolksdorf, R. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 47. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12814-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12814-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12813-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12814-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)