Abstract
This paper presents a feasibility study to compare the performance of fingerprint recognition on rural and urban Indian population. The analysis shows that rural population is very challenging and existing algorithms/systems are unable to provide acceptable performance. On the other hand, fingerprint recognition algorithms provide comparatively better performance on urban population. The study also shows that poor images quality, worn and damaged patterns and some special characteristics affect the performance of fingerprint recognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maltoni, D., Maio, D., Jain, A.K., Prabhakar, S.: Handbook of fingerprint recognition. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Jain, A.K., Bolle, R., Hong, L.: Online fingerprint verification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19(4), 302–314 (1997)
Jain, A.K., Prabhakar, S., Hong, L., Pankanti, S.: Filterbank-based fingerprint matching. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 9(5), 846–859 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Puri, C., Narang, K., Tiwari, A., Vatsa, M., Singh, R. (2010). On Analysis of Rural and Urban Indian Fingerprint Images. In: Kumar, A., Zhang, D. (eds) Ethics and Policy of Biometrics. ICEB 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6005. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12595-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12595-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12594-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12595-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)