Abstract
To effectively handle the scale of processing required in information extraction and analytical tasks in an era of information explosion, partitioning the data streams and applying computation to each partition in parallel is the key. Even though the concept of MapReduce has been around for some time and is well known in the functional programming literatures, it is Google which demonstrated that this very high-level abstraction is especially suitable for data-intensive computation and potentially has very high performance implementation as well. If we observe the behavior of a query plan on a modern shared-nothing parallel database system such as Teradata and HP NeoView, one notices that it also offers large-scale parallel processing while maintaining the high level abstraction of a declarative query language. The correspondence between the MapReduce parallel processing paradigm and the paradigm for parallel query processing has been observed. In addition to integrated schema management and declarative query language, the strengths of parallel SQL engines also include workload management and richer expressive power and parallel processing patterns. Compared to the MapReduce parallel processing paradigm, however, the parallel query processing paradigm has focused on native, built-in, algebraic query operators that are supported in the SQL language. Parallel query processing engines lack the ability to efficiently handle dynamically-defined procedures. While the “user-defined function” in SQL can be used to inject dynamically defined procedures, the ability of standard SQL to support flexibility of their invocation, and efficient implementation of these user-defined functions, especially in a highly scaled-out architecture, are not adequate. This paper discusses some issues and approaches in integrating large scale information extraction and analytical tasks with parallel data management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, Q., Hsu, M.: Data-Continuous SQL Process Model. In: Proc. 16th Int. Conf. CoopIS 2008 (2008)
Dean, J.: Experiences with MapReduce, an abstraction for large-scale computation. In: International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation Techniques. ACM, New York (2006)
DeWitt, D., Stonebraker, M.: MapReduce: A major step backward. The Database Column (2008), http://www.databasecolumn.com/2008/01/mapreduce-a-major-step-back.html
Gray, J., Liu, D.T., Nieto-Santisteban, M.A., Szalay, A.S., Heber, G., DeWitt, D.: Scientific Data Management in the Coming Decade. SIGMOD Record 34(4) (2005)
Greenplum, Greenplum MapReduce for the Petabytes Database (2008), http://www.greenplum.com/resources/MapReduce/
Isard, M., Budiu, M., Yu, Y., Birrell, A., Fetterly, D.: Dryad: Distributed data-parallel programs from sequential building blocks. In: EuroSys 2007 (March 2007)
Jaedicke, M., Mitschang, B.: User-Defined Table Operators: Enhancing Extensibility of ORDBMS. In: VLDB 1999 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hsu, M., Chen, Q. (2009). Scalable Data-Intensive Analytics. In: Castellanos, M., Dayal, U., Sellis, T. (eds) Business Intelligence for the Real-Time Enterprise. BIRTE 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 27. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03422-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03422-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03421-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03422-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)